Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Social-economic Differentials of the Dying Risk of the oldest- old Chinese 1998-2002 Liu, Guiping Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Social-economic Differentials of the Dying Risk of the oldest- old Chinese 1998-2002 Liu, Guiping Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research."— Presentation transcript:

1 Social-economic Differentials of the Dying Risk of the oldest- old Chinese 1998-2002 Liu, Guiping Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research

2 Summary 1. Briefing the existing studies 2. A simple framework 3. Data and method 4. Variables and descriptive statistics 5. Statistical outcomes 6. Main findings 7. Brief discussion

3 1.Briefing the existing studies 1. Kannisto (1994) reported the differentials of mortality at high ages in developed countries. No social economic factors were involved. 2. Martelin, Koskinen, Valkonen (1998): the dying risk of the oldest-old Finish is significantly associated with income level, educational attainment, occupational experience,marital status, residential place,linguistic attachment. 3. The similar researches in developing countries are rare.

4 2.A simple framework

5 3. Data and method Data: the second wave of Chines Healthy Longevity Survey 2000 –Starting time of the observation:1998 base-line survey Method: Cox Proportional Hazard Model

6 4.Variables Variables: –age group, sex, place of birth,ethnicity; –years of education, number of children ever born; number of biological siblings, birth orders, main occupation before age 60; –marital status, living arrangement, main source of financial support, –self-rated health status.

7 5. The descriptive statistics Majority of the oldest-old were born in countryside; Hans account for major proportion of the interviewees; A few people received education longer than seven years; Fifty percent of the interviewees were farm labors before age 60; Eighty percent of the interviewees were taken care by children, grand-children, or children-in-law when they were ill; Eighty-four percent of the oldest-old are living with household members; Sixty-five percent of the oldest-old depended on their children financially.

8 6. Statistical outcomes (1) Age group relative risk of dying –80-84(ref.) 1.00 –85-89 1.27* –90-94 1.73* –95-99 2.27* –100-101 2.74* –102-105 2.82* –106 and older 3.04*

9 6. Statistical outcomes (2) sex relative risk of dying –Male ( ref.) 1.00 –Female 0.81*

10 6. Statistical outcomes (3) place of birth relative risk of dying –urban areas ( ref.) 1.00 –rural areas 1.11* ethnicity –Hans (ref.) 1.00 –minority groups 0.84*

11 6. Statistical outcomes (4) Marital status relative risk of dying –married, living with spouses ( Ref.) 1.00 –separated or divorced 1.27 –widowed 1.41* –never married 1.10

12 6. S tatistical outcomes (5) Years of education relative risk –0 year (ref.) 1.00 –1-6 years 0.90* –7 years or more 0.92

13 6. Statistical outcomes ( 6 ) Main occupation before age 60 relative risk –professional & technical personnel ( ref.) 1.00 –governments, management 1.26 –farm labors, forest, husbandry,fishery workers 1.34* –manufacture workers 1.42* –commercial or services workers 1.48* –househusband or housewife 1.54* –other 1.61*

14 6. Statistical outcomes ( 7 ) Main source of financial support relative risk –retirement pension ( ref. 1.00 –spouse 1.08 –children 0.97 –grand-children 1.06 –other relative 1.00 –local governments or community 0.94 –still on work 0.50* –others 1.17

15 6. Statistical outcomes ( 8 ) No.of biological siblings relative risk –0 ( ref. ) 1.00 –1 0.95 –2 0.93 –3 0.95 –4 0.91 –5 0.84* –6 or more 0.82*

16 6. Statistical outcomes ( 9 ) Birth order relative risk –1 st ( ref. ) 1.00 –2 nd 0.98 –3 rd 0.98 –4 th 0.80* –5 th 0.91 –6 th or higher 0.92

17 6. Statistical outcomes ( 10 ) Self-rated health status relative risk of dying –very good ( ref. ) 1.00 –good 1.15* –so-so 1.45* –poor or very poor 1.98* –not able to answer 2.38*

18 7. Main findings Social economic statuses are associated with mortality of the oldest-old Chinese; Lower social status, e.g, born in rural areas; manual workers, expose to higher risk of dying than do professionals and technicians; The widowed expose to high risk of dying; Having more siblings indicate a lower risk of dying;

19 7.Main findings ( continued ) Those persons who were in birth order four show lower risk of dying, but we have no solid theory to explain the result; We did not find living arrangement, residential place, are associated with the dying risk of the oldest-old Chinese.

20 8. Discussion Our study is based on the following background: –1. The oldest-old is a highly selective groups; –2. The length of the observation is around 24 months; –3. A common statistical method is applied. Our study suggests that the early events in human life course have impacts on survival probability at age 80 and over.


Download ppt "Social-economic Differentials of the Dying Risk of the oldest- old Chinese 1998-2002 Liu, Guiping Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google