1. Brad E. Dicianno, MD Statistics For Residents University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Dept. of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation VA Pittsburgh Health Care System Human Engineering Research Laboratories What you never thought you would understand…

2. Overview: When reading (or writing) a paper, you should be able to: Classify and describe the data What does ‘nominal’ mean again? Decide what tests are appropriate How am I supposed to know if I am supposed to run a T-test? Understand the significance of the tests It gave me a p value. Am I done now? Know how data should be reported And be able to catch their mistakes!

3. Overview: You should then be able to… Evaluate the utility of the Diagnostic Tests Does a + result mean anything? Evaluate efficacy of Therapies Did the interventions actually do anything? Evaluate relevance of Exposures Did those at risk suffer any harm? Know more than you need to know for boards

4. Classifying and Describing Data

5. Step 1: Classify your Variables

6. Categorical Categories, groups Gender, Race, Job, Favorite color Yes/No

7. Ordinal Ordered; data goes in specific direction Dividing doesn’t make sense PGY1, PGY2, PGY3… Always, Sometimes, Never…

8. Continuous Numerical Scale You can divide the numbers Weight, Height, Exam Score

9. Try it out… FIM score Arm temperature Med route (po, NG, IV) Modified Ashworth Score Plantar response Type of insurance Albumin level

10. Try it out… FIM scoreOrdinal Arm temperatureContinuous Med route (po, NG, IV)Categorical Modified Ashworth ScoreOrdinal Plantar responseCategorical Type of insuranceCategorical Albumin levelContinuous

11. Step 2: Normal or Not Normal?

12. Normal = Parametric

13. Not Normal = Non Parametric

14. Skewness Excess skewness is NOT normal Negatively Skewed Mode Median Mean Symmetric (Not Skewed) Mean Median Mode Positively Skewed Mode Median Mean

15. Kurtosis Excess kurtosis is NOT normal

16. Options for determining normal distributions Graph the frequencies on y axis and value of variable on x axis OR Run a program like SPSS Skewness -1 to 1 is normal Kurtosis -1 to 1 is normal

17. Other descriptives Mean (average) Median (middle value) Mode (most often occurring) Standard Deviation Ranges (low to high) 122333444455555

18. Step 3: Decide what you want to do with the data

19. Looking for associations Is pain related to medication use? Is gender related to exam scores? Is alcohol use related to albumin levels?

20. Predicting/Correlations Does weight go up if height goes up? Does BP go down if exercise level goes up? Does HR increase with prolonged bedrest?

21. Prediction/Regression Y=mx + b Does body fat percentage (x) predict body image satisfaction (y)? Do pain scores (x) predict participation in PT (y)?

22. Step 4: Choose the test. Use the handout.

23. Step 5: Report the results. Hypothesis (Null hypothesis) Alpha level P value Be careful with reporting “no differences…” Remember, just because you didn’t find a difference, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

24. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Likelihood Ratio (LR) Likelihood of the test result in patients with a condition compared to the likelihood of test result in those without the condition Post test Odds (PTO) How likely to have the condition if testing +

25. Likelihood Ratio Condition + Condition - Test +AB Test -CD LR = A/(A+C) / B/(B+D) PTO = LR * Pretest odds

26. Example: Pregnancy test A pregnancy test gives a + result in 75 out of 100 women who are pregnant, and a – result to the other 25. In women who are not pregnant, it tells 50 they are +, and 50 they are -. How likely is a woman to be pregnant if she gets a + result? Assume she is 50% confident she is pregnant.

27. Fill in the blanks… Condition + Condition - Test +AB Test -CD LR = A/(A+C) / B/(B+D) PTO = LR * Pretest odds

28. Likelihood Ratio Condition + Condition - Test +A 75 B 50 Test -C 25 D 50 LR = A/(A+C) / B/(B+D) PTO = LR * Pretest odds

29. Likelihood Ratio Condition + Condition - Test +A 75 B 50 Test -C 25 D 50 LR = A/(A+C) / B/(B+D) = 75/100 / 50/100 = 1.5 PTO = 1.5 * 0.5 = 0.75 = 75%

30. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Likelihood Ratio Likelihood of the test result in patients with a condition compared to the likelihood of test result in those without the condition LR = 1.5 PTO = 75% Positive result is 1.5 times more likely in pregnant women than non-pregnant With a + test, odds of being pregnant increase to 75%

31. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Sensitivity Positive Predictive Value Specificity Negative Predictive Value

32. Example: Evaluating the usefulness of a net designed to catch green fish

33. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Sensitivity True positives/everyone with condition you want to pick up True - True + False - False + True -

34. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Sensitivity = ½ = 0.5 True positives/everyone with condition you want to pick up True - True + False - False + True - You caught 1 of the 2 fish you should have caught.

35. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Positive Predictive Value True positives/all positives True - True + False - False + True -

36. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Positive Predictive Value = 1/3 True positives/all positives True - True + False - False + True - 1 of the 3 fish you did catch was of the right kind

37. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Specificity True negatives/everyone w/o condition True - True + False - False + True -

38. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Specificity = 3/5 True negatives/everyone w/o condition True - True + False - False + True - Your net correctly ignored 3 of the 5 fish it wasn’t supposed to catch.

39. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Negative Predictive Value True negatives/all negatives True - True + False - False + True -

40. Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Negative Predictive Value = 3/4 True negatives/all negatives True - True + False - False + True - The net correctly ignored 3 of the 4 fish it didn’t catch.

41. Evaluating Therapies Relative Risk (risk ratio) (RR) Ratio of risk in treated group to risk in control group Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) % reduction in risk in treated group compared to controls Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) Diff. in risk between controls and treated Number needed to treat (NNT) # you have to treat to prevent one adverse outcome

42. Treatment Effects Outcome + Outcome - TreatedAB ControlCD Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) X=C/(C+D)

43. Treatment Effects Outcome + Outcome - TreatedAB ControlCD RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) X=C/(C+D) RRR= 1 – RR * 100% ARR = X – Y NNT = 1/ARR

44. Fictional Example: A New HIV vaccine 100 people at high risk of HIV are given HIV vaccine, and 100 people are given nothing. They are followed over time. 25 of the people with the vaccine develop HIV. All of the people without the vaccine develop HIV. Should you recommend the vaccine?

45. Fill in the Boxes… HIV+HIV- New HIV Vaccine AB ControlCD RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) = X=C/(C+D) = RRR= 1 – RR * 100% ARR = X – Y NNT = 1/ARR RR = RRR = ARR = NNT =

46. Treatment Effects HIV+HIV- New HIV Vaccine A 25 B 75 ControlC 100 D0D0 RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) = X=C/(C+D) = RRR= 1 – RR * 100% ARR = X – Y NNT = 1/ARR RR = RRR = ARR = NNT =

47. Treatment Effects HIV+HIV- New HIV Vaccine A 25 B 75 ControlC 100 D0D0 RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) = 0.25 X=C/(C+D) = 1.00 RRR= 1 – RR * 100% ARR = X – Y NNT = 1/ARR RR = 0.25 RRR = 75% ARR = 0.75 NNT = 1.33

48. Evaluating Therapies Relative Risk (risk ratio) (RR) Ratio of risk in treated group to risk in control group 0.25 Those without vaccine have 4 times the risk of getting HIV

49. Evaluating Therapies Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) % reduction in risk in treated group compared to controls 75% Those with vaccine have a 75% reduced risk of getting HIV

50. Evaluating Therapies Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) Diff. in risk between controls and treated 0.75 Those with Vaccine have a risk 0.75 greater than controls.

51. Evaluating Therapies Number needed to treat (NNT) # you have to treat to prevent one adverse outcome 1.33 You need to give the vaccine to at least 2 people to prevent HIV in one person.

52. Evaluating Exposures Relative Risk (risk ratio) (RR) Ratio of risk in exposed group to risk in control group Odds Ratio How many times more likely someone is to have been exposed (compared to controls)

53. Evaluating Exposures Outcome + Outcome - ExposedAB ControlCD RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) X=C/(C+D) OR = AD/BC

54. Fictional Example: 25 out of 100 people on the Atkins diet had heart attacks. 10 out of 100 people on regular diets had heart attacks. Would you discourage the Atkins diet?

55. Fill in the boxes… Outcome + Outcome - ExposedAB ControlCD RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) X=C/(C+D) OR = AD/BC

56. Evaluating Exposures Outcome + Outcome - ExposedA 25 B 75 ControlC 10 D 90 RR = Y/X Risk in each group Y=A/(A+B) = 0.25 X=C/(C+D) = 0.10 OR = AD/BC RR = 2.5 OR = 3

57. Evaluating Exposures Relative Risk (risk ratio) (RR) Ratio of risk in exposed group to risk in control group Odds Ratio How many times more likely someone with a disease is to have been exposed (compared to controls)

58. Evaluating Exposures Relative Risk (risk ratio) (RR) Ratio of risk in exposed group to risk in control group 2.5 Heart attacks occur 2.5 times more often in those on Atkins diet.

59. Evaluating Exposures Odds Ratio How many times more likely someone with a disease is to have been exposed (compared to controls) 3.0 Those having a heart attack were 3 times more likely to have been on the Atkins diet than on a regular diet.

60. Errors Null Hypo TRUE Null Hypo FALSE Accept H 0 1 - alphaBeta Type II Error Reject H 0 alpha Type I Error 1- Beta POWER