Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

North American Energy Infrastructure Policy Philip Gonda Steven Mays Robert Floyd Josh Kapp.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "North American Energy Infrastructure Policy Philip Gonda Steven Mays Robert Floyd Josh Kapp."— Presentation transcript:

1 North American Energy Infrastructure Policy Philip Gonda Steven Mays Robert Floyd Josh Kapp

2 Background DOH defines the U.S. Energy infrastructure: – electricity, petroleum and natural gas. – 80 % under private ownership Electricity – generated at more than 6400 power plants, – moved over 200,000 miles of transmission lines – distributed to 143 million customers. Federal regulation – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Regulates wholesale/interstate electricity sales Oversight of the reliability of Bulk Power Supply through NERC – North American Electric Reliability Corporation Establishes and enforces Bulk Power System standards. The Nations Bulk Power system – 8 regions U.S. Canada portion of Mexico. Oil/Gas Pipeline – Over 500,000 miles w/in U.S. – Federal government lacking sufficient regulation personnel

3 Cyber Attacks Issues: Cyber vulnerabilities w/in the National Energy Infrastructure – U.S. economy, emergency services and defense/security forces dependent on the Bulk Power System – System has become increasingly reliant on computers and integrated into the World Wide Web and national networks. Smart Grid Remote Stations – U. S. computer systems are under increasing attacks Director of National Intelligence – “dramatic increase in the frequency of malicious cyber activity targeting U.S. computer systems Secretary of Defense believes U.S. – “high risk of cyber attacks against U.S. critical infrastructures and network, the opponents are increasing their cyber capabilities and represent … a serious menace” – U.S. Bulk Power System cyber systems are not protected NERC responsible for establishing/enforcing cyber security standards Currently only 8 standards in place – Process cumbersome, slow and hard to enforce Presently only Electric and Nuclear sectors have some cyber security standards http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/9403/security/secretary-of-defense-panetta-on-u-s-cyber-capabilities.html

4 Cyber Attacks Effects: – Destruction of Services Stuxnet Rolling Blackouts – Denial of Services Ping of Death Zero day exploits Coordinated cyber and offensive actions – Russia/ Georgian conflict was the first cyber attack and kinetic operation coordination Corrective Actions: – Incentivizes acceptance of Standards Reimburse cost of security equipment to private industry – Active testing NERC White hat system assessment Provides security status of Bulk Power System cyber security Populates cyber vulnerability/ mitigating action database – Collaborative info sharing Central site for push/pull cyber security information Patch Tuesday http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/technology/13cyber.html?_r=0

5 Physical Attacks on Electric Grid Issues: – Attacks include physical damage from Terrorist Weather Competitors Employees Activists – Complete reliance upon Electricity – Integration of all other major energy sources rely upon electricity from the grid. – Substations and Large High Voltage Transformers Limited Security – Limited Spare Parts Available – Low Probability vs Massive Impact Effects: – Outages could last for weeks to months – Cascading Blackouts – Economic – Health and Human Welfare

6 Physical Attacks on Electric Grid Corrective Actions: – Increase Surveillance and Security on site – Incentives to promote the development, manufacture and stock piling of temporary spare parts – Increase investment in current infrastructure as well as Research and Development. – Increase Resiliency by creating a more dense network of High Voltage Transformers

7 Pipeline Infrastructure Issues Issues: Aging infrastructure – Unpredictable failure modes – Weather effects – Effects 1050 Incidents 36% Structural/material damage +$700 million 2000 injuries and fatalities 350,000 barrels of oil lost or spilled. Inadequate Federal Manning Levels – Effects Delegated Regulation Inconsistent regulation Excavation and Farming activities 23% Excavation Damage

8 Pipeline Significant Incidents

9 Pipeline Policy Proposal Leverage technology – Survey and assess the quality of pipeline – Ease manpower burden – Reduce disruption & destruction Information sharing & Transparency – Shared understanding of failure modes – Collectively mitigate risks

10 Energy Demand Issues: US is projected to become an energy exporter @ 2020. Energy for transportation and increased electrical demand of emerging economies drive concerns – If world competition increases, world price increases – If North American reserves are not fully realized, we again become and importer and need to compete on the world market Effects: – Diminishing Economy due to increased costs – Competition with other emerging countries (China / India) Corrective Actions: – State department helping industry in developing India and China. Encourage their membership in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – Continued R & D to encourage diversification is sources of energy, specifically Natural Gas, and Renewables – Continued R& D and incentives in Transportation sector to promote alternative fuels (Bio,Hybrid, CNG), and increase use availability of public transportation.

11

12

13 Transportation Projections

14 Questions?


Download ppt "North American Energy Infrastructure Policy Philip Gonda Steven Mays Robert Floyd Josh Kapp."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google