Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL.

Published byDonald Hicks Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL."— Presentation transcript:

1 DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL Curtis Williams, Ph.D. Senior Breeder Tifton, GA

2 DP 515 BG/RR (DPLX04Y170BR) Breeder: Dr. Curtis Williams, Tifton, GA Mid-Full maturity Semi-smooth leaves Tall, upright plant Bushy fruiting habit Excellent yield potential (yielded = DP 555 BG/RR) Very good fiber quality potential (better than DP 555 BG/RR) Storm tolerance: 4 (1=loose, 10=high plains type) Seed size (#/lb): 5300-5800 (slightly larger vs. DP 555 BG/RR) Tested Beltwide in OVTs, ASTs in 2005 Introductory commercial quantities in 2006 Full commercial quantities expected for 2007 Characteristics

3 DP 515 BG/RR Breeding History 2000 – Original cross made at Scott, MS 2000-01 – F1 grown at Costa Rica 2001 – F2 bulk population grown at Tifton, GA; selected for apparent yield, maturity, lint percent & HVI 2002 – F2:3 progeny rows grown at Tifton, GA and sprayed OT with glyphosate @ 4TL stage; row # 1134, later tested as DPLX04Y170BR, selected for maturity, apparent yield potential, lint percent & HVI 2003 – Replicated tests at 3 GA locations; seed increased at Scott, MS 2003-04 – Seed increased at Costa Rica 2004 – Tested at 14 replicated stage 4 locations beltwide; seed increased in AZ 2005 – Large-plot, on-farm testing and OVT testing beltwide 2006 – Continued large-scale testing and introductory commercial quantities

4 DP 515 BG/RR DP 143 B2RF Relative Difference in DD60s to reach 100% open* *based on D&PL Technical Services final plant map data compiled as of 12.7.2006 Relative Maturity Differences Beltwide DP 555 BG/RR DP 444 BG/RR DP 117 B2RF DP 164 B2RF DP 445 BG/RRDP 455 BG/RRDP 449 BG/RRDP 454 BG/RRDP 488 BG/RR DP 110 RF DP 147 RF DP 434 RR DP 432 RRDP 494 RR DP 167 RFDP 121 RF

5 66 on-farm locations Beltwide; 2005-06; 12-19-06 Plant Ht (in) Total Nodes Fruit- ing Nodes Height: Node Ratio (in/inter- node) Node of 1st Fruit- ing Branch Node of Upper- most Cracked Boll Node of Upper- most Harvest- able Boll DD60s earlier vs DP 555 BG/RR DP 445 BG/RR35.019.811.21.775.611.515.8105 DP 455 BG/RR39.521.312.11.865.711.716.870 DP 454 BG/RR37.321.211.71.776.111.816.873 DP 515 BG/RR38.222.012.21.736.312.217.554 DP 555 BG/RR41.023.413.11.756.712.518.9 LSD (0.05)3.71.6 NS0.6NS1.586 DP 515 BG/RR vs mid-full D&PL BG/RRs Plant Growth and Maturity Values within columns in blue font do not significantly differ from the highest value (underlined) at P<0.05.

6 DP 515 BG/RR Performance Vs. key D&PL BG/RRs –DP 555 BG/RR (#1 in 2006) –DP 444 BG/RR (#2 in 2006) –DP 445 BG/RR –DP 455 BG/RR –DP 454 BG/RR Vs. key competitor varieties *source: ‘Cotton Varieties Planted, 2006 Crop’, USDA-AMS

7 Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; T test: NS = not significant; *** = significant at P <0.001 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 555 BG/RR 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources (as of 12-19-06) % Difference

8 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 555 BG/RR All Data Sources (as of 12-19-06) % Yield Difference N 7 5 7 14 20 14 79 43 111 57 (+ = DP 515 BG/RR better) Regional Performance No significant differences, according to T tests West = SJV and AZ; High Plains = Northern and Southern HP

9 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 444 BG/RR 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources (as of 12-19-06) % Difference Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; T test: NS = not significant; *** = significant at P <0.001

10 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 444 BG/RR All Data Sources (as of 12-19-06) % Yield Difference N 8 12 25 17 8 75 110 56 66 (+ = DP 515 BG/RR better) Regional Performance * = significant at P< 0.05, according to T test; all other regional differences were not significant High Plains = Northern and Southern HP *

11 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 445 BG/RR 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources (as of 12-19-06) % Difference Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; T test: NS = not significant; *** = significant at P <0.001

12 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 445 BG/RR All Data Sources (as of 12-19-06) % Yield Difference N 7 5 10 12 29 17 9 78 103 117 83 (+ = DP 515 BG/RR better) Regional Performance * = significant at P< 0.05, according to T test; all other regional differences were not significant High Plains = Northern and Southern HP *

13 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 455 BG/RR 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources (as of 12-19-06) % Difference Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; T test: NS = not significant; *, **, *** = significant at P <0.05, <0.01, and <0.001, respectively

14 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 455 BG/RR All Data Sources (as of 12-19-06) % Yield Difference N 7 10 13 28 17 10 77 90 119 83 (+ = DP 515 BG/RR better) Regional Performance -10.6% * = significant at P< 0.05, according to T test; all other regional differences were not significant West = SJV and AZ; High Plains = Northern and Southern HP *

15 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 454 BG/RR 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources (as of 12-19-06) % Difference Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; T test: NS = not significant; *** = significant at P<0.001

16 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 454 BG/RR All Data Sources (as of 12-19-06) % Yield Difference N 9 6 11 23 17 6 81 110 116 81 (+ = DP 515 BG/RR better) Regional Performance No significant differences, according to T tests West = SJV and AZ; High Plains = Northern and Southern HP

17 DP 515 BG/RR vs DP 555 BG/RR and Competitors Cents/lb or Loan Value = $0.52/lb +/- premiums or discounts according to 2006 USDA Loan Chart; $/A = Yield x Loan; Values within columns in blue font do not significantly differ from the highest value (underlined) at P<0.05. 450001G sold as brands DG2520B2RF, CG4020B2RF, ST4357B2RF, BW4630B2RF and Americot 1532 B2RF. Least square mean analysis; restricted to trials where >4 of these varieties were tested; 2005-06 Beltwide data; all datasources as of 12-19-06

18 Summary – DP 515 BG/RR Good companion to DP 555 BG/RR –Earlier maturity, but still mid-full –Slightly better seedling vigor –Less aggressive growth habit –Slightly better storm tolerance –Slightly better fiber quality potential –Equivalent yield potential Good yield performance vs. D&PL early- to mid-maturing varieties –DP 444 BG/RR, DP 445 BG/RR, DP 455 BG/RR & DP 454 BG/RR

19 Summary – DP 515 BG/RR cont’d Strong yield & fiber quality performance history –Midsouth/SE, and picker areas of TX –Best performance in southern tier Strong performance history against key competitor varieties

Download ppt "DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL."

Similar presentations

EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.

EVALUATION OF GREENSEEKER FOR NITROGEN FETILIZATION IN COTTON ALABAMA REPORT 1 Evaluation of Green Seeker for Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton – Preliminary.
Welcome to a WestBred ® Brand Webinar FEBRUARY 11, 2014.

Welcome to a WestBred ® Brand Webinar FEBRUARY 11, 2014.
Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.

Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.
AZdrip 2008 Cotton Growth Stage mid bloom (08/14/2008) * = Nodes Above White Flower ** = per plant # drip lines per bed HUAP NAWF * # Nodes H:N(in) # Bolls.

AZdrip 2008 Cotton Growth Stage mid bloom (08/14/2008) * = Nodes Above White Flower ** = per plant # drip lines per bed HUAP NAWF * # Nodes H:N(in) # Bolls.
Benefits and Liabilities Associated with Early Maturity and Determinacy in Cotton.

Benefits and Liabilities Associated with Early Maturity and Determinacy in Cotton.
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.

Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
Soybean Agronomics Eric P. Prostko Department of Soil & Crop Science The University of Georgia.

Soybean Agronomics Eric P. Prostko Department of Soil & Crop Science The University of Georgia.
NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.

NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.
Variety Testing Hybrid Testing Dr. Chad Lee Grain Crops Extension Specialist (859) 257-3203 Grain Crops Extension.

Variety Testing Hybrid Testing Dr. Chad Lee Grain Crops Extension Specialist (859) Grain Crops Extension.
ACGA Seed Development Committee Started in 2001 Crossing nursery in 2001, 2002, & 2003 Evaluation nursery in 2005, & 2006 10 lines in ACGA advanced trials.

ACGA Seed Development Committee Started in 2001 Crossing nursery in 2001, 2002, & 2003 Evaluation nursery in 2005, & lines in ACGA advanced trials.
Cultivar Traits and Characteristics for Mechanical Harvest for Fresh Markets and Progress in Southern Highbush Breeding James Olmstead In-Service Training.

Cultivar Traits and Characteristics for Mechanical Harvest for Fresh Markets and Progress in Southern Highbush Breeding James Olmstead In-Service Training.
Will D. Duffie 1, A. S. Culpepper 2, A. C. York 3, A. MacRae 2, P. Roberts 2 and P. H. Jost 4 1 University of Georgia, Waynesboro, GA 2 University of Georgia,

Will D. Duffie 1, A. S. Culpepper 2, A. C. York 3, A. MacRae 2, P. Roberts 2 and P. H. Jost 4 1 University of Georgia, Waynesboro, GA 2 University of Georgia,
Phosphorus Nutrition of Cotton

Phosphorus Nutrition of Cotton
1 Cotton 2005 Ouachita Fertilizer River Parishes.

1 Cotton 2005 Ouachita Fertilizer River Parishes.
Seed Quality Variety life span. Value Shifts Continue No longer just a seed… Planting unit Technology Vigor Protection Fiber Quality Additional Traits.

Seed Quality Variety life span. Value Shifts Continue No longer just a seed… Planting unit Technology Vigor Protection Fiber Quality Additional Traits.
Comparative Performance of BARBREN and LONREN David B. Weaver Professor Department of Agronomy and Soils Auburn University AL 36849 Dallas, TX, April 4,

Comparative Performance of BARBREN and LONREN David B. Weaver Professor Department of Agronomy and Soils Auburn University AL Dallas, TX, April 4,
Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK 1972-2006.

Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK
Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems Michael Patterson, Bob Goodman and Dale.

Comparison of Conventional, Roundup Ready, and Liberty-Link Cotton Weed Management Programs in Two Tillage Systems Michael Patterson, Bob Goodman and Dale.
Defoliation, Harvest, and Cotton Quality…. Philip Jost University of Georgia.

Defoliation, Harvest, and Cotton Quality…. Philip Jost University of Georgia.
CONVENTIONAL VS. TRANSGENIC: THE SHOWDOWN Robert Hogan, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jason L. Johnson, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jeanne Reeves, Cotton, Incorporated;

CONVENTIONAL VS. TRANSGENIC: THE SHOWDOWN Robert Hogan, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jason L. Johnson, Texas AgriLife Extension; Jeanne Reeves, Cotton, Incorporated;

Similar presentations

Ads by Google