Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bank Liquidity and Wholesale Funding II Examination Guidance and Procedures.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bank Liquidity and Wholesale Funding II Examination Guidance and Procedures."— Presentation transcript:

1 Bank Liquidity and Wholesale Funding II Examination Guidance and Procedures

2 2  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

3 3 RD Memo, Transmittal #2000-046  Issued August 22, 2000  In response to: – Increase in FHLB membership – Increased complexity and short-term nature of advances  Discusses: – Asset/liability management strategies that banks employ with the use of advances – Framework for examining the effects of these strategies.

4 4 Section 6.1 of the Manual of Examination Policies  Additional funding sources, such as: – Borrowings – Trust preferred securities – Asset securitization  Core versus non-core deposits  Brokered and rate sensitive deposits  Warning indicators for liquidity and contingency planning  Funding diversification versus cost  Changes in UBPR ratio analysis

5 5 RD Memo, Transmittal #2002-039  Issued August 28, 2002  FDIC does not discourage use of wholesale funding sources when incorporated into well-managed funding program  Examiner comments/criticisms related to: – Degree of risk faced – Quality of bank management

6 6 Supervisory Perspective  Risks associated with FHLB advance usage  Impact when managing: – Liquidity – IRR – Earnings – Capital

7 7 Liquidity Implications  Historically - liquidity ratings were driven by balance sheet ratios  Now - possible for banks to operate with fewer liquid assets  Examiners – consider bank's access to wholesale funding sources

8 8 Examination Guidance and Procedures  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

9 9 Advance Usage and UBPR Liquidity Ratios  Advances categorized as non-core funding  Use can increase non-core funding dependence ratios

10 10 Caution Be careful when determining institution's core funding sources. – Classified as core – may not be – Not classified as core – may be – Advances can increase the loans/deposits ratio

11 11 When Assessing Liquidity…  Traditional liquidity ratios may not present accurate picture  Follow existing exam guidance – consider: – UBPR ratios – Stability of FHLB advances – Institutions unused borrowing capacity

12 12 Examination Guidance and Procedures  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

13 13 Secured Borrowings – Disadvantages  Require collateral to be pledged  Removes these assets as possible liquid sources  Concern is partially mitigated – FHLB accepts assets not normally considered liquid

14 14 Ramifications of FHLB Advances  Banks should understand ramifications  FHLB can curtail advances if collateral quality deteriorates below standards  Banks should have backup plan  Banks should understand risks associated with Option-Advance Programs

15 15 Funds Management Policies  Should discuss use of non-core funding sources  Limits and types should be outlined  Discuss how these funds should be used  Consistent with bank's strategic plan  Board should understand risks/rewards

16 16 Red Flag  Rapid growth funded by advances  Strategy driven by consultant's recommendation more than board/management strategic plan

17 17 Examination Guidance and Procedures  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

18 18 FHLB Advances and IRR  Second area where FHLB advances should be evaluated  Advances can reduce or increase a bank's IRR exposure

19 19 IRR Measurement System  Management measurement system  Capture effect advances and assets funded by advance has on the bank's IRR exposure

20 20 Advance Containing Options  Pay special attention to these  Rise in interest rates – FHLB probably would exercise its option  Examiners – determine if bank's IRR measurement system accounts for terms of FHLB advances

21 21 Examination Guidance and Procedures  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

22 22 Purchasing Earning Assets  Some banks use advances to purchase earning assets  May cause increased IRR and credit risk  May cause a decline in the NIM and ROA  Monitor this risk/reward tradeoff

23 23 Advances and Growth Strategy  Advances used as part of growth strategy require controls  Examiners – determine if institution has controls in place

24 24 Projections  Projections should be made for: – Cash flows – Profits – Balance sheet composition – Resulting increase in risk  Examiners – review this activity

25 25 Examination Guidance and Procedures  Overview  UBPR ratios  Borrowings and Pledging  Interest Rate Risk  Capital and Earnings  Examples

26 26 Wholesale Funding Transaction Jan. 15, 2004 – Bank obtained FHLB advance and purchased FNMA note

27 27 Wholesale Funding Transaction (continued)  Funding – $10 Million FHLB advance at 2.95% 121 bp less than a traditional 5-year, fixed-rate advance 31 bp less than a traditional 1-year, fixed-rate advance – 5-year /1-year option  Investment – $10 Million FNMA note at 4.11%  Matures on 1/15/2009

28 28 Transaction Performance How did this strategy work? DateNoteAdvanceSpread 1/20044.11%2.95%116 bp On 2/15/2005 advance was called and replaced with a fixed rate, non-callable advance at 4.20% for a 3.75 year term. 2/2005 - Present 4.11%4.20%(9 bp)

29 29 Replacement Funding  New advance  Spread on transaction changes dramatically – is negative  Initial low advance rate - attractive  Many institutions do not consider repercussions

30 30 Risk Associated with Callable Advances  Option will be exercised to benefit FHLB  Detriment to the borrowing institution  Examiners may see this scenario

31 31 Examiners – Consider These Questions  Does management understand characteristics/risks?  Is transaction consistent with bank's strategic plan?  Does transaction comply with bank's policy requirements?

32 32 Also Consider…  Was management’s selection process of components carefully considered?  Prior to executing transaction – did management evaluate risk/reward tradeoffs?

33 33 Finally, consider these questions…  Is the bank’s IRR measurement system capable of accurately modeling both the asset and liability components of the transaction?  What is the transaction’s effect on the bank’s overall IRR exposure?  What is the impact on the bank’s liquidity?

34 34 Wholesale Funding Transaction  Proposed Transaction  Investment – $10 Million FNMA 5:0% CMO (Accretion Directed, TAC) – Average Life: 5 years – Yield: 4:98%  Funding – $10 Million FHLB Amortizing Advance – Maturity: 5 years – Rate: 3.09%

35 35 Wholesale Funding Transaction Bank Balance Sheet:Before Transaction Total Assets $100 MillionLiabilities $90 Million Capital $10 Million Tier 1 Capital Ratio: 10% Bank Balance Sheet:Before Transaction Total Assets $110 MillionLiabilities $100 Million Capital $10 Million Tier 1 Capital Ratio: 9.1% Projected Spread: 1.89%

36 36 Funds Management Policies  Leveraging with FHLB advances easily attained in large quantities allows for rapid growth  Banks need sound funds management policies  Growth should be planned and well- managed

37 37 Questions Examiners Might Ask  Asset quality  Economic conditions  Overall risk profile With the decline in the bank's capital ratio, is the bank's capital position expected to remain satisfactory when considering trends in:

38 38 A Growing Source of Funding  Growth in traditional core deposit products lag increases in non-core funding  Wholesale funding – secondary source of support for community banks  Yet, this funding source is growing

39 39 Depositor Behavior  Influenced by several factors  Depositors more inclined to invest in shorter-term, highly liquid deposit products  Bank customers do not want to tie up dollars for extended periods of time

40 40 We Might Ask:  Are these funds actually 'core' deposits?  How 'sticky' are these 'core' deposits?

41 41 Higher Yields Depositors investing funds longer-term utilizing higher yielding deposit products (i.e. brokered, jumbo CDs)

42 42 Wholesale Funding Trend  Due to various factors – wholesale funding plays prominent role in banking strategies  Trend likely to continue

43 43 In the next section… Select the next section, Presentation Review, to continue.


Download ppt "Bank Liquidity and Wholesale Funding II Examination Guidance and Procedures."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google