1. Computer-aided drug discovery (CADD)/design methods have played a major role in the development of therapeutically important small molecules for several decades. They may help in significantly decreasing the number of compounds that should be screened experimentally with high-throughput screening (HTS). Computational Methods in Drug Discovery

2. Example 1: CADD tools used to screen for inhibitors of tyrosine phosphatase-1B, an enzyme implicated in diabetes (Doman et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.): Traditional HTS gave, out of the 400,000 compounds tested, 81 featuring inhibition, producing a hit rate of only 0.021%. Virtual screening of a database of 235 000 commercially available compounds yielded 365 compounds, 127 of which showed effective inhibition, a hit rate of nearly 35%. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery

3. Example 2: CADD in search for inhibitors of novel transforming growth factor-1  receptor (TGF-  ) kinase domain (The TGF-  signaling pathway may play a role in a number of disease states) Traditional HTS (Eli Lilly): to identify a lead compound that was subsequently improved by examination of structure-activity relationship (Sawyer et al., 2003) Virtual screening of compounds identified 87 hits, the best hit being identical in structure to the lead compound discovered through the traditional HTS approach (Biogen Idec, Singh et al., 2003)  CADD, a method involving reduced cost and workload: capable of producing the same lead as a full-scale HTS.

4. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery Example 2: Identical lead compounds discovered in: CADD, a method involving reduced cost and workload, was capable of producing the same lead as a full-scale HTS. Traditional HTSLigand-based Virtual Screening

5. CADD: Some of the earliest examples of approved drugs that owe their discovery in large part to the tools of CADD include the following: carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dorzolamide used to treat glaucoma (Vijayakrishnan 2009) the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril, an antihypertensive drug (Talele et al., 2010) three therapeutics for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV): saquinavir, ritonavir, and indinavir (Van Drie 2007) tirofiban, a fibrinogen antagonist (Hartman et al., 1992) Computational Methods in Drug Discovery

6. Some of the earliest examples of approved drugs that owe their discovery in large part to the tools of CADD

7. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery CADD: a method with reduced cost and workload: capable of producing the same lead as a full-scale HTS. capable of increasing the hit rate of novel drug compounds because it uses a much more targeted search than traditional HTS and combinatorial chemistry used to: filter large compound libraries guide the optimization of lead compounds design novel compounds, either by " growing" starting molecules one functional group at a time or by piecing together fragments into novel compounds.

8. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery Target Identification CADD Structure- based Ligand- based 3D structure of the target Information on Ligands Ligand docking Fragment- based Design Ligand-based virtual screening QSAR Pharmacophore modelling Lead optimization These methods are broadly classified as either structure- based or ligand-based methods. adapted from Silkowski et al., 2013

9. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery CADD can be classified into two general categories: Structure- based Ligand- based Structure-based CADD relies on the knowledge of the target protein structure to select compounds based on their binding energies. Ligand-based CADD exploits the knowledge of known active and inactive molecules through  chemical similarity searches or  construction of predictive, quantitative structure-activity relation (QSAR) models.

10. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery generally preferred where high-resolution structural data of the target protein are available, i.e., for soluble proteins that can readily be crystallized. Structure- based generally preferred when no or little structural information is available, as often for membrane protein targets. Ligand- based

11. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery Ligand- based Ligand-based computer-aided drug discovery (LB-CADD) approach involves:  Choose ligands known to interact with the target of interest  Use a set of reference structures collected from this ensemble of ligands  Analyze their 2D or 3D structures. Overall goal: represent these compounds with their most important physicochemical properties for their desired interactions Discard extraneous information not relevant to the interactions

12. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery Ligand- based Two fundamental approaches of LB-CADD are Difference between the two approaches: QSAR weights the features of the chemical structure of the compounds according to their influence on the biological activity of interest. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure Selection of novel compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

13. Ligand- based Among the computational chemistry methods: Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships (QSARs). QSARs: equations that help to predict biological “activity” from chemical structure of ligands. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

14. What is QSAR ? Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure QSAR studies try to quantitatively link the variations of the biological activity of molecules (ligands) with changes in their molecular descriptors. The molecular descriptors are characteristics featuring electronic, spectroscopic or other properties (hydrophobicity). The biological activity and the physicochemical properties are connected by some mathematical function F : Biological activity = F (Physicochemical Properties) The aim is to determine these relationships and to apply them on new chemical entities.

15. How a molecule behaves?  from its structure. Small molecules containing from one to four carbon atoms are gases at room temperature: methane CH 4, ethane C 2 H 6, propane C 3 H 8, butane C 4 H 10 Adding more carbons: the substance becomes: hexane, C 6 H 14 : a liquid and octadecane, C 18 H 38: a solid. Adding one oxygen atom to methane (CH 4 ): Methanol (CH 3 OH) is a a liquid This behaviour is not limited to predicting whether the molecule is a solid, liquid or gas, but predicting more various and complex properties. Where does the QSAR principle come from ? Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

16. A number of molecules whose activity is known is required. Physicochemical descriptors for these molecules and a mathematical method appropriate to obtain a model is also needed. What does one need to do QSAR ? Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

17. Set of Compounds Activity Data (Y) Molecular Descriptors (X i ) QSAR Y = f(X i ) Interpretation Prediction Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

18. Ligand- based Molecular descriptors can be structural physicochemical Properties such as:  molecular weight  geometry  volume, surface areas, electronegativities, polarizabilities  functional group composition  solvation properties Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

19. Electrostatic Geometrical 3-D shape and structure Thermodynamic Constitutional, Topological 2-D structural formula Electrostatic Quantum Chemical Types of Molecular Descriptors 2-D structural formula Geometrical 3-D shape and structure Quantum Chemical Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

20. Ligand- based Molecular descriptors are classified according to their “ dimensionality” 1D scalar physicochemical properties such as molecular weight 2D molecular constitution-derived descriptors 3D molecular conformation-derived descriptors 4D extension of 3D-QSAR that treats each molecule as an ensemble of different conformations Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

21. Ligand- based Prediction of Psychochemical Properties. The simplest ones, such as molecular weight and number of hydrogen bond donors, are relatively simple to compute. More complex descriptors such as solubility are more difficult to compute. Prediction of physicochemical properties is a critical step in developing effective molecular descriptors. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

22. Constitutional, Topological 2-D structural formula Ligand- based The mathematical methods used are Least square fit, principal component analysis, partial least squares, genetic algorithms or neuronal networks Simple Linear Regression Multiple Linear Regression Partial Least-Squares (PLS) Regression Neuronal Networks Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure Activity = a o + a 1 (Mol Vol i ) Activity = a o + a 1 (Mol Vol i ) + a 2 (logP) + a 3 (  i ) +... Activity = a o + a 1 (PC1) + a 2 (PC2) + a 3 (PC3) +...

23. Constitutional, Topological 2-D structural formula Ligand- based Comparative field molecular analysis (CoMFA) (Cramer et al., 1988) : 3D-QSAR technique aligns molecules and their molecular interaction fields to relate them to biological activity. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

24. Constitutional, Topological 2-D structural formula Ligand- based Methodology 1.Choice of a set of representative molecules (ligands) == Training set 2. Definition of the bioactive conformation of each molecule (3D information) 3. Alignment of molecules 4. Definition of a 3D grid including the totality of the molecules (larger than the volume of the molecules) 5. Calculating for each molecule in every point of the grid the interaction energy with a probe atom  steric (van der Waals) and electrostatic fields 6. Importing all the energy values in a table 7. Correlation between the variations of the biological activity and the variations of the fields Biological Activity = f (fields) Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

25. CoMFA: Comparative Molecular Field Analysis 2. Definition of the bioactive conformation of each molecule (3D information) Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

26. CoMFA: Comparative Molecular Field Analysis 3. Alignment of molecules The data are separated into a training set for which a CoMFA model is derived and a test set that will prove the predictivity of the model ill be proved Liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) (nuclear receptors) agonists Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

27. 4. Definition of a 3D grid including the totality of the molecules 5. Calculating for each molecule in every point of the grid the interaction energy with a probe atom steric (van der Waals) and electrostatic fields 6. Importing all the energy values in a table QSAR equation PLS Contour Maps Predictions Ligand- based Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

28. 7. Correlation between the variations of the biological activity and the variations of the fields Biological Activity = f (fields) Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure Ligand- based

29. Success of QSAR depends: on the quality of the initial set of active/inactive compounds And on the choice of descriptors And the ability to generate the appropriate mathematical relationship. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure

30. Ligand- based QSAR models identified novel positive and negative allosteric modulators of mGlu5 implicated in neurologic disorders using data set from HTS (Mueller et al. (2012). The descriptors included scalar, 2D, and 3D descriptor categories. Construction of a QSAR model that predicts biologic activity from chemical structure QSAR-based virtual screening of mGlu5 negative allosteric modulators yields lead compounds that contain substructure combinations taken across several known actives used for model generation.

31. Ligand- based toolbox of methods Virtual screening is a toolbox of methods to select appropriate candidates. Input: chemical structures and calculated properties of the compounds Virtual screening: applied to virtual libraries of almost any size. Underlying assumption: similar structures have similar biological activity. Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

32. Ligand- based Ligand Structure Searches Strategies 2D Substructure searches 3D Substructure searches Pharmacophore matching using chemotype information from first generation hits Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

33. Ligand- based 2D Substructure Searching Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

34. 2D Similarity Searching Ligand- based Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

35. 3D Substructure Searching Ligand- based Search database of molecules for ones with similar 3D shape and chemistry Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

36. Pharmacophore Searching Ligand- based A pharmacophore: contains information about functional groups that interact with the target as well as information regarding the type of noncovalent interactions and interatomic distances between these functional groups/interactions. This arrangement can be derived in a ligand-based approach or in a structure- based manner Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure

37. Pharmacophore Searching Ligand- based Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure 1.Selection of representative molecules 1.Choose a reference molecule 3.Definition of the bioactive conformation of the chosen molecules 4.Superposition of all molecules on the reference 3.Pharmacophore Feature Extraction 4.Design of new molecules

38. Pharmacophore Searching Ligand- based Selection of compounds based on chemical similarity to known active compounds using some similarity measure 3-D pharmacophore search for anti-HIV Protease compounds