Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOswin Heath Modified over 9 years ago
1
Henning Gisselø Danish Meteorological Institute in Copenhagen Operational forecaster for 17 years
2
S03 HIRLAM (NWP) has problems when predicting 2mTemp (max and min) in cases with no or just a few clouds.
3
S03 HIRLAM 3.3km * 3.3km * 40 layers * 90sek +54 h Hydrostatic Introduced spring 2009
4
In situations with only a few clouds the model is predicting too low max temp in day time and too high min temp in night time.
5
CASE The night between the 13 th and 14 th October 2009
6
Analysis, 14 th Oct. 00 UTC
7
NOAA, 14 th Oct. 02:43 UTC
8
S03 2mT Min, wind, cloudcover
9
- 3 - 5 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 1 + 3
10
Possible explainations from The HIRLAM Developing Group
11
DAYTIME CLOUDCOVER MODEL: many clouds ACTUALLY: few clouds RESULT: higher temp observed than predicted by model
12
DAYTIME EVAPORATION MODEL: high evaporation (moist soil) ACTUALLY: low evaporation (dry soil) RESULT: higher temp observed than predicted by model
13
NIGHT TIME CLOUDCOVER MODEL: many clouds ACTUALLY: few clouds RESULT: lower temp observed than predicted by model
14
NIGHT TIME HEAT CONDUCTION FROM GROUND MODEL: high heat conduction from ground ACTUALLY: low heat conduction from ground RESULT: lower temp observed than predicted by model
15
NIGHT TIME VEGETATION MODEL: low vegetation ACTUALLY: high vegetation High vegetation cools more efficient than low vegetation, producing a cooler surface layer. RESULT: lower temp observed than predicted by model Growing through spring and summer
16
END OF STORY
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.