Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMagnus Wheeler Modified over 9 years ago
1
Radiative Transfer Effects in Hydrogen Recombination: 2γ Transitions and Lyα Diffusion Christopher Hirata Orsay – July 2009 With special thanks to: E. Switzer (Chicago) D. Grin, J. Forbes, Y. Ali-Haïmoud (Caltech)
2
Outline 1.Motivation, CMB 2.Standard picture 3.He recombination 4.Two-photon decays in H 5.Lyman-α diffusion
3
Cosmic microwave background The CMB has revolutionized cosmology: - Tight parameter constraints (in combination with other data sets) - Stringent test of standard assumptions: Gaussianity, adiabatic initial conditions - Physically robust: understood from first principles. (Linear perturbation theory.) WMAP Science Team (2008) 1. Motivation, CMB
4
CMB and inflation Primordial scalar power spectrum: n s, s measured by broad-band shape of CMB power spectrum the damping tail will play a key role in the future (Planck, ACT, SPT, …) probe of inflationary slow-roll parameters: (for single field inflation; but measurements key for all models) 1. Motivation, CMB
5
This is the CMB theory! 1. Motivation, CMB
6
This is the CMB theory! n e = electron density (depends on recombination) 1. Motivation, CMB
7
Recombination history z … as computed by RECFAST1.3 (Seager, Sasselov, Scott 2000) The “standard” recombination code until Feb. 2008. H + + e - H z: acoustic peak positions degenerate with D A z: polarization amplitude He + + e - He z: damping tail degenerate with n s He 2+ + e - He + no effect 2. Standard picture
8
Standard theory of H recombination (Peebles 1968, Zel’dovich et al 1968) = 2-photon decay rate from 2s P esc = escape probability from Lyman- line A Ly = Lyman- decay rate e = recombination rate to excited states g i = degeneracy of level i i = photoionization rate from level i R = Rydberg 1s 2s2p 3s3p3d H + + e - 22 Lyman- resonance escape radiative recombination + photoionization 2. Standard picture
9
Standard theory of H recombination (Peebles 1968, Zel’dovich et al 1968) = 2-photon decay rate from 2s P esc = escape probability from Lyman- line = probability that Lyman- photon will not re-excite another H atom. Higher or P esc faster recombination. If or P esc is large we have approximate Saha recombination. 1s 2s2p 3s3p3d H + + e - 22 Lyman- resonance escape radiative recombination + photoionization 2. Standard picture
10
Helium level diagram 3. He recombination 1s 2 1 1 S 0 1s2s 2 1 S 0 1s2p 2 1 P 1 1s2s 2 3 S 1 1s2p 2 3 P 0,1,2 1s3s 3 1 S 0 1s3p 3 1 P 1 1s3d 3 1 D 2 1s3s 3 3 S 1 1s3p 3 3 P 0,1,2 1s3d 3 3 D 1,2,3 SINGLETS (S=0) TRIPLETS (S=1) 2 52/s 1 , 584Å 1.8x10 9 /s 1 , 591Å 170/s from 2 3 P 1 only 1 , 626Å 1.3x10 -4 /s
11
Issues in He recombination Mostly similar to H recombination except: Two line escape processes He(2 1 P 1 ) He(1 1 S 0 ) + 584Å He(2 3 P 1 ) He(1 1 S 0 ) + 591Å These are of comparable importance (Dubrovich & Grachev 2005). Feedback: redshifted radiation from blue line absorbed in redder line. Enhancement of escape probability by H opacity: He(2 1 P 1 ) He(1 1 S 0 ) + 584Å H(1s) + 584Å H + + e - ( Hu et al 1995 ) 3. He recombination
12
He II I recombination history 3. He recombination thermal equilibrium Seager et al 2000 Switzer & Hirata 2007 Accel. from 2 3 P 1 decay Accel. from H opacity
13
3. He recombination Current He recombination histories
14
Two-photon decays H(2s) H(1s) + + (8.2 s -1 ) included in all codes. But what about 2 decays from other states? Selection rules: ns,nd only. Negligible under ordinary circumstances: H(3s,3d) H(2p) + 6563Å, depopulates n 3 levels. In cosmology: so 3s,3d 2 decays might compete with 2s (Dubrovich & Grachev 2005). Obvious solution: compute 2 decay coefficients 3s,3d, add to multilevel atom code. 4. Two-photon decays in H
15
Calculation p. 1 Easy! This is tree-level QED. Feynman rules (in atomic basis set): electron propagator photon propagator vertex (electric dipole) Ignore positrons and electron spin – okay in nonrelativistic limit. 4. Two-photon decays in H
16
Calculation p. 2 Two diagrams for 2 decay: M= + Total decay rate: ( =k for on-shell photon) Problem: infinite because M contains a pole if n 1 =2 … n-1 (n 1 p intermediate state is on-shell). 4. Two-photon decays in H
18
∞ The resolution to this problem in the cosmological context has provided some controversy. (See Dubrovich & Grachev 2005; Wong & Scott 2007; Hirata & Switzer 2007; Chluba & Sunyaev 2007; Hirata 2008). Lots more this afternoon! Pole displacement: rate still large, e.g. Λ 3d = 6.5×10 7 s -1. This includes sequential 1 decays, 3d 2p 1s. Re-absorption of 2 radiation. No large rates or double-counting in optically thick limit. 4. Two-photon decays in H
19
Radiative transfer calculation A radiative transfer calculation is the only way to solve the problem. Must consistently include: Stimulated 2 emission (Chluba & Sunyaev 2006) Absorption of spectral distortion (Kholupenko & Ivanchik 2006) Decays from n 3 levels. Raman scattering – similar physics to 2 decay, except one photon in initial state: H(2s) + H(1s) + Two-photon recombination/photoionization. 2008 code did not have Lyman- diffusion (now included – thanks to J. Forbes). 4. Two-photon decays in H
20
Radiative transfer calculation The Boltzmann equation: f = photon phase space density = number of decays / H nucleus / Hz / second Ill-conditioned at Lyman lines: coefficients (or large). But solution is convergent: 4. Two-photon decays in H
21
Numerical approach Key is to discretize the 2γ continuum. Each frequency bin (ν,Δν) is treated as a virtual level. Included in multi- level atom code. In the steady-state limit, the virtual level can be treated just like a real level: –2γ decay –2γ excitation –Feedback But it’s just a mathematical device! 4. Two-photon decays in H 1s nl virtual ν’ ν
22
Physical effects 1 Definitions: a 2 decay is “sub-Ly ” if both photons have E E(Ly ). Sub-Ly decays: Accelerate recombination by providing additional path to the ground state. Delay recombination by absorbing thermal + redshifted Ly photons. The acceleration always wins, i.e. reaction: H(nl) H(1s) + + proceeds forward. 4. Two-photon decays in H
24
Physical effects 2 Super-Ly decays are trickier! Also provide additional path to ground state. But for every super-Ly decay there will later be a Ly excitation, e.g.: H(3d) H(1s) + 6563Å H(1s) + 1216Å H(2p) The net number of decays to the ground state is zero. But there is an effect: Early, z>1260: accelerated recombination. Later, z<1260: delayed recombination. Same situation for Raman scattering. 4. Two-photon decays in H
27
Phase space density Full result Without 2 decays Blackbody Ly Ly Ly
28
4. Two-photon decays in H
29
L Correction: 0.19 ACBAR 0.27 WMAP5 7 Planck
30
Doppler shifts & Lyman-α diffusion So far we’ve neglected thermal motions of atoms. Main effect is in Lyman-α where resonant scattering leads to diffusion in frequency space due to Doppler shift of H atoms. Diffusion coefficient is Rapid diffusion near line center, very slow in wings. 5. Lyman-α diffusion
31
Doppler shifts & Lyman-α diffusion Can construct Fokker-Planck equation from two physical conditions (e.g. Rybicki 2006): Exactly conserve photons in scattering Respect the second law of thermodynamics: must preserve blackbody with μ-distortion, f ν ~e -hν/T. hf ν /T term can be physically interpreted as due to recoil (e.g. Krolik 1990; Grachev & Dubrovich 2008). Effect is to push photons to red side of Lyman-α, speeding up recombination. With J. Forbes, diffusion now patched on to 2γ radiative transfer code. 5. Lyman-α diffusion
32
Numerical details Solve Fokker-Planck equation (FPE) in frequency region near Lyα. –Discretize FPE without Hubble term in ν direction to convert to system of stiff ODEs. (Default 2000 bins.) –No photons allowed to diffuse out of bounds. –Hubble redshift implemented by stepping all photons 1 bin to the red at each time step. Required for solution: –f ν @ blue boundary; atomic level populations. –Solve iteratively with atomic level + 2γ code. 5. Lyman-α diffusion
35
L
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.