Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.

Published byJustina Angela Williamson Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments."— Presentation transcript:

1 Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 13 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference Reno, Nevada May 8-12, 2011 For Kazem Oryani, WSA Cissy Kulakowski, WSA Liren Zhou, WSA Lihe Wang, WSA Tom Adler, RSG Mark Fowler, RSG

2 Outline of Presentation Objective Model Steps Data Analysis a) Year 2001 Household Survey b) Year 2003 SCAG Model c) Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey Time-of-Day Model Model Replication Scenario Analysis Prototype Test Results Future Steps 2

3 To update and enhance the existing trip-based SCAG regional travel demand model to allow it to be used for the analysis of different pricing alternatives. Objective: 3

4 Model Steps: Enhancements by WSA Enhancements by PB 4

5 437 383 143 104 202 80 140 Ventura Co. San Bernardino Co. Riverside Co. Orange Co. Note: All trips shown in thousands Source: SCAG 2003 Model Validation and Summary, January, 2008. Pacific Ocean 130 75 Los Angeles Co. Intracounty Travel Intercounty Travel LEGEND 92 5,772 673 1,700 694 80 Year 2003 Home-based County to County Work Trip Flows 5 Imperial Co. Riverside Co.

6 181 153 175 91 135 Los Angeles Co. 58 92 Ventura Co. San Bernardino Co. Orange Co. Los Angeles Co. Pacific Ocean Riverside Co. 6,345 1,063 2,094 1,236 205 74 357 512 Note: All trips shown in thousands Source: SCAG 2003 Model Validation and Summary, January, 2008. Intracounty Travel Intercounty Travel LEGEND Year 2020 Home-based County to County Work Trip Flows 6 Imperial Co. Riverside Co.

7 Data Analysis: Year 2001 SCAG Household Travel Survey  Person trip: 84,000  Activity episodes: 190,000  Distribution of survey trips by trip purpose  Home-based trips - Direct work trips: 15 percent - “Other” home-based trips: 12 percent Work-based Other Trips: 10 percent Non-Home-based Trips: 30 percent 7

8 Data Analysis: Distribution of Survey Trips by Trip Purpose 8

9 Data Analysis: Departure Time Distribution by Purpose Home-based Auto From-Home Trips Time of Day Percentage of Daily Trips Home-based other (Sample: 4,980) Home-based school (Sample: 1,465) Home-based shopping (Sample: 2,868) Home-based serve passenger (Sample: 3,483) Home-based social/recreational (Sample: 2,668) Home-based university (Sample: 443) Home-based work (direct) Sample: 7,368) Home-based work ( strategic (includes a stop)) (Sample: 1,679) 9 Home-based school Home-based work (strategic) Home-based work (direct)

10 Data Analysis: Departure Time Distribution by Purpose Home-based Auto To-Home Trips Time of Day Percentage of Daily Trips Home-based other (Sample: 4,312) Home-based school (Sample: 1,084) Home-based shopping (Sample: 3,555) Home-based serve passenger (Sample: 2,973) Home-based social/recreational (Sample: 3,043) Home-based university (Sample: 387) Home-based work (direct) Sample: 6,437) Home-based work (strategic (includes a stop)) (Sample: 2,546) 10 Home-based school Home-based work (strategic) Home-based work (direct)

11 Data Analysis: Travel Time (minute) Distribution by Purpose Home-based Auto From-Home Trips Home-based other Home-based school Home-based shopping Home-based serve passenger Home-based social/recreational Home-based university Home-based work (direct) Home-based work ( strategic (includes a stop)) Time of Day Percentage of Daily Trips 11 Home-based school Home-based work (strategic) Home-based work (direct)

12 Data Analysis: Year 2003 SCAG Model: Congested and free-flow travel times Distance Zonal population density Zonal employment density 12

13 Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey: Stated Preference Survey to Support Model Changes  3,600 survey record for all six SCAG counties  Discrete choice model by trip purpose: work, business trips, non-work  Time-of-day: peak, off-peak $2.00$3.00$4.00$3.00$2.00 13

14 Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey: Hypothetical Reaction to Pricing For Range of Fees 14

15 Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey: Change in Tripmaking (Trip Suppression / Inducement) (Negative = Suppression, Positive = Inducement) Peak Non-work Trip 15

16 Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey: Ability to Shift Time of Travel - Current Peak Period Travelers 16

17 Year 2010 Stated Preference Survey: Travel Time Shift Model - Work Commute Trips 17

18 Time-of-Day Model: Time-of-Day Model Variables Origin zone characteristics (such as CBD, density, other) Destination zone characteristics (such as CBD, density, other) Trip purpose Mode Traveler’s household size Traveler’s household income Number of household workers Number of household vehicles Traveler’s age Traveler’s employment industry type Each time-of-day choice model includes a combination of the following variables: 18

19 Time-of-Day Model: 1. Home-based work direct trips (HBWD) from home 2. Home-based work direct trips (HBWD) to home 3. Home-based work strategic trips (HBWS) from home 4. Home-based work strategic trips (HBWS) to home 5. Home-based shopping trips (HBSH) from home 6. Home-based shopping trips (HBSH) to home 7. Home-based other (including social and recreational) trips (HBSR) from home 8. Home-based other (including social and recreational) trips (HBSR) to home 9. Other-based other (OBO) trips Model Estimated 19

20 Time-of-Day Model: HBWD From-Home Trip Time-of-Day Choice Model Summary 20

21 21 Model Replication: Time-of-Day by 31 Time Slices Home-based Work Direct Trips (HBWD) From Home

22 Model Replication: Time-of-Day Home-based Work Direct Trips (HBWD) From Home 22

23 23 Model Replication: Time-of-Day by 31 Time Slices Home-based Work Direct Trips (HBWD) To Home

24 Model Replication: Time-of-Day Home-based Work Direct Trips (HBWD) To Home 24

25 Model Replication: Time-of-Day Scenario Analysis Flow Chart D/MC:Destination/Mode Choice TOD MNL:Multi-Nominal Logit Time-of-Day Model Base Run with No Pricing Price/User Fee MNL:Multi-Nominal Logit Time Shift Model including Pricing Priced TOD:Time-of-Day Matrices With Pricing Impacts Base TOD:Base Time-of-Day Matrices Without Pricing Impacts ShiftShifted Trips Due to Pricing Shift Adj.:Adjusted Amount of Shifted Trips Adj. Price TOD:Adjusted Time-of-Day Matrices Before Trip Suppression Positive Adj. Shift:Shifted Trips not Subjected to Trip Suppression TS (0.1):Trip Suppression (Factor to be determined for each Origin-Destination Pair based on Trip Suppression Model) 25

26 HOT Lane Projects 26

27 27 Improvement of Volume / Count Match (RMSE Statistics)  AM Peak - 2.2%  Midday - Similar  PM Peak - 4.3%  Night - 4.8% Prototype Test Results - Comparison of Diurnal and TOD Method

28 Count Locations 28

29 29 Comparison of Diurnal and TOD Method Assignment Summary Statistics Using Diurnal Method Assignment Summary Statistics Using Time-of-Day Method

30 30 Regional Screenline Locations

31 Prototype Tests Priced Cases VMT Charge $0.05 Per Mile, 3 Hour AM, 4 Hour PM Peak Periods Trip Table Effects Reduction of 6.0 Percent in AM Peak Trip Reduction of 5.8 Percent in PM Peak Trip Increase of 5.0 Percent in Midday Trips Increase of 7.3 Percent in Night Trips 31 VMT Charges vs. No Toll Pricing Assumptions - $0.05 Per Mile for AM and PM Peak Periods (Trip Table)

32 VMT Charge $0.05 Per Mile, 3 Hour AM, 4 Hour PM Peak Periods Screenline Effects Reduction of 6.2 Percent in AM Peak Trip Reduction of 8.0 Percent in PM Peak Trip Increase of 8.2 Percent in Midday Trips Increase of 6.8 Percent in Night Trips 32 Prototype Tests Priced Cases (cont’d) VMT Charges vs. No Toll Pricing Assumptions - $0.05 Per Mile for AM and PM Peak Periods (Screenline Comparison)

33 Regional Freeway Pricing Cordon Pricing Parking Pricing 33 Prototype Tests Priced Cases (cont’d)

34 1.Use of TOD Improves Model Calibration / Validation Status 2.The Higher / Vaster Application of Pricing, the Higher Impacts in AM and PM Peak Trip Reduction 3.Targeted Cordon and Parking Pricing in Hypothetical Downtown LA Pricing: Affected Trips About 2.0 Percent Trip Reduction for AM and PM Peak From -1.0 to -0.3 Percent 34 Summary of Prototype Tests Future Steps: Tests and Scenario Analysis With Integrated Model

35 Acknowledgement: Contributions of Annie Nam, Guoxiong Huang, Wesley Hong and Warren Whiteaker of Southern California Association of Governments, Linda Bohlinger of HNTB Corporation, Edward Regan of Wilbur Smith Associates, Thomas Adler, Mark Fowler of RSG are greatly appreciated. Contact: Kazem Oryani Email: koryani@wilbursmith.com Phone: 203-865-2191 35

Download ppt "Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments."

Similar presentations

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.

THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.

Regional Bicycle Demand Model: In Use Today in Portland Bill Stein, Metro TRB Transportation Applications Conference Reno, Nevada – May 9, 2011.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.

GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
National Household Travel Survey California Data (NHTS-CA)

National Household Travel Survey California Data (NHTS-CA)
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07

Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.

Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Comparison of Activity-Based Model Parameters Between Two.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.

Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.

SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.

Development of a New Commercial Vehicle Travel Model for Triangle Region 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference, Columbus, Ohio May 7, 2013 Bing Mei.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks

Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.

Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.

May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.

KY 4/22 Module 1b Chapter 3 in the TS Manual Main Survey Types.
Model Validation & Application for Significant Growth Areas in Florida Presented by: Myung-Hak Sung Thursday, May 12, 2011 TRB Planning Applications Conference.

Model Validation & Application for Significant Growth Areas in Florida Presented by: Myung-Hak Sung Thursday, May 12, 2011 TRB Planning Applications Conference.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,

1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
THE TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK ON SEATTLE’S HIGHWAY NETWORK Chang-Hee Christine Bae (University of Washington) Larry Blain (Puget.

THE TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS OF A TERRORIST ATTACK ON SEATTLE’S HIGHWAY NETWORK Chang-Hee Christine Bae (University of Washington) Larry Blain (Puget.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula and Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google