Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byNathan Hamilton Modified over 9 years ago
1
HIGH-FREQUENCY KINETIC INSTABILITIES DRIVEN BY ANISOTROPIC ELECTRON BEAMS 20 March 2013 Anna Kómár 1, Gergő Pokol 1, Tünde Fülöp 2 1)Department of Nuclear Techniques, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Association EURATOM 2)Department of Applied Physics, Chalmers University of Technology and Euratom-VR Association I. Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling
2
Description of the instability Runaway electron distributions Wave dispersions Growth rate of the waves Critical runaway densities Plans, current problems Outline 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 2/29
3
Runaway distribution 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling T. Fülöp, PoP 13(062506), 2006 p = γv e /c normalized momentum 3/29 Anisotropic → Instabilities
4
20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling response Imaginary part Growth rate Particle-wave interaction Dispersion of the plasma waves: (homogeneous plasma) Dielectric tensor Perturbative analysis k : wave number ω : wave frequency c : speed of light 4/29
5
General resonance condition Ultrarelativistic resonance condition Generalizations 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Magnetosonic- whistler wave Electron-whistler, EXEL wave High electric field distribution function Near-critical field distribution function 5/29
6
Near-critical distributionAvalanche distribution Distribution function 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling T. Fülöp, PoP 13(062506), 2006P. Sandquist, PoP 13(072108), 2006 6/29 p = γv e /c normalized momentum
7
Distribution function Qualitatively similar Lower electric field → less anisotropy Growth rate of the waves: Ensured by the anisotropy Not affected by the details 20 March 2013 7/29 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling
8
Electron plasma waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Relaxing the electromagnetic approximation: Approximations for the dielectric tensor: 8/29 T.H. Stix, Waves in Plasmas (AIP, 1992)
9
Electron plasma waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Dielectric tensor: Wave dispersion: 9/29
10
Electron plasma waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 10/29 Qualitatively different for B > 2.6 T
11
Electron plasma waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 11/29
12
Electron plasma waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 12/29 Cold plasma approximation is used (th. motion << gyro-motion) Validity: 20 keV, 10 keV, 1 keV
13
Calculating the growth rate of the waves 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 13/29 Unperturbed dispersion: Perturbed dispersion: The wave frequency changes: → Calculating the runaway susceptibilities:
14
General resonance condition 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Resonance condition: implicit UltrarelativisticGeneral case 14/29 T.H. Stix, Waves in Plasmas (AIP, 1992)
15
Restrictions on the wave dispersion 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Resonant momentum is physical if: (1) (2) and Whistler and high-k region of EXEL 15/29 and
16
Growth rate in near-critical field (Whistler) 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Maximum out of the EW region of validity 16/29 E/E c = 1.3 B = 2 T n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3 n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3 Order of resonance:
17
Growth rate in near-critical field (EXEL) 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling No growth rate for k < 1300 m -1 17/29 E/E c = 1.3 B = 2 T n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3 n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3 Order of resonance: k || c = ω 0
18
Growth rate in near-critical field 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Electron-whistler waveExtraordinary electron wave Near-critical case → max. energy (2.6 MeV, p = 5) 18/29 most unstable wave E/E c = 1.3, B = 2 T, n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3, n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3 10 2 γ / ω ce
19
Damping rates of the wave, stability 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Collisional damping: Convective damping: The runaway beam has a finite radius, L r 19/29 M. Brambilla, PoP 2(1094), 1995 G. Pokol, PPCF 50(045003), 2008
20
Critical density (Whistler) 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Stability: Finding (Growth rate – Damping rates) = 0 (for the most unstable wave) Critical runaway density 20/29 T = 20 eV T = 1000 eV Unstable Stable E/E c = 1.3 n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3
21
Critical density (EXEL) 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 21/29 Orders of magnitude lower critical density Break at B ~ 2.6 T (for high temperature) T = 20 eV T = 1000 eV E/E c = 1.3 n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3
22
What is different with EXEL? 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 22/29 Slightly higher growth rate Orders of magnitude lower convective damping Collisional damping smoothes this effect for low T E/E c = 1.3, n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3, n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3
23
What is different with EXEL? 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 23/29 E/E c = 1.3, n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3, n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3 Parameters of the most unstable wave change from θ ~ 0
24
What is different with EXEL? 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 24/29 For the parameters of the most unstable wave:
25
Wave instability in near-critical electric field Generalization Relaxing the electromagnetic approximation General resonance condition Linear stability The most unstable wave is dependent on the maximum runaway energy Stability threshold is significantly lower for the EXEL 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling Conclusions 25/29
26
Plans, current problems 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 26/29 Growth rates for high electric field Avalanche runaway distribution No (or much higher) maximum energy Whistler wave Electron-whistlerMagnetosonic-whistler T. Fülöp, PoP 13(062506), 2006 E/E c = 865 B = 2 T n e = 5 ∙ 10 19 m -3 n r = 3 ∙ 10 17 m -3
27
Extraordinary electron wave Most unstable wave would be in the region of no-growth rate (if there is a maximum runaway energy) Plans, current problems 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 27/29 Maximum runaway energy k || c = ω 0 This is not a problem!
28
Plans, current problems 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 28/29 For k || c > ω 0 : n ≤ 0 For k || c < ω 0 : n > 0
29
Plans, current problems 20 March 2013 A. Kómár - Kinetic instabilities driven by anisotropic electron beams Chalmers Meeting on Runaway Electron Modelling 29/29 k || c > ω 0 k || c < ω 0 n = 0, -1 n = 1 Maximum at k || c = ω 0 : with n ≠ 0
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.