Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErin Banks Modified over 9 years ago
1
financing deinstitutionalisation By Julia Down Hope and Homes for Children BiH
2
HOPE AND HOMES FOR CHILDREN BIH Background › HHC in BiH since 1994 › Initially worked to improve conditions in institutions - but limited success › Moved focus to developing family-based services - but this did not automatically reduce number of children in institutions › Now concentrating on directly transforming institutions
3
Sarajevo SITUATION IN BIH Population 3.8 mill Divided into FBiH and RS 3000 children without parental care Around 1100 children in 17 institutions
4
NATIONAL STRATEGY POLICY ON PROTECTION OF CHILDREN WITHOUT PARENTAL CARE AND FAMILIES AT RISK IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2006-2016 D eveloped by government with active support of UNICEF, SCUK, HHC and others Officially adopted in FBiH in January 2008
5
NATIONAL STRATEGY Outlines detailed and practical plan for reforming legislation, building capacity of CSWs, developing family-based alternatives to institutional care and transformation of institutions › Every institution to be transformed within 10 years › Model of transformation outlined in detail in the strategy - conforms to the model developed by HHC › Strategy calls for pilot project to test the model in the BiH context
6
ZENICA PROJECT BACKGROUND › HHC as lead organisation in implementing pilot project › Negotiations with local authorities led to agreement to transform institution in city of Zenica › DC Most institution with capacity for 60 children aged 0-18+
7
TRANSFORMATION OF DC MOST Main partner Zenica city municipality as founder of institution › HHC assessed every child and their families › Recommended a family-based placement for each child based on individual needs › Analysed average number of new children entering the institution every year in order to predict demand for new services
8
SERVICES TO REPLACE THE INSTITUTION Prevention Reintegration Fostering Local adoption Young adult support Small family home
9
HHC providing capital investment, some transitional costs, training, management and monitoring of project Staff of institution have priority in applying for jobs in new services 18-month project to transform the institution Jan 2007 – June 2008
10
TRANSFORMATION OF DC MOST Total Number of Children 67 Reintegration with biological families 19 Adoption within BiH 12 Placement in foster families 11 Independent living for young people aged 18 and over 13 Placement in Small Family Home 12
11
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ZENICA BiH has very decentralised political system Institutions for children are managed and financed at local level This works differently in different locations 4 Federation of BiH Republika Srpska
12
DC Most – financed on “per head” basis › Children placed by CSW in municipality from where they come › CSW pays institution monthly rate per child › The institution has no other formal source of income KAKANJ VAREŠ ZAVIDOVIĆI ŽEPČE MAGLAJ DOBOJ-JUG USORA TEŠANJ VISOKO BREZA OLOVO
13
RUNNING COSTS OF DC MOST CAPACITY (aged 0-18) 60 TOTAL BENEFICIARIES PER YEAR 75 FUNDING SYSTEM Monthly Centres for Social Work€ per Zenica-Doboj Canton265 Outside Zenica-Doboj Canton 292
14
HOW MUCH DOES DC MOST COST THE STATE? CSW% # of Children Monthly Per Child TOTAL Monthly TOTAL Annual Zenica - Doboj Canton 75%45265 €11 925 €143 100 € Outside Zenica - Doboj Canton 25%15292 €4 380 €52 560 € 16 305 €195 660 €
15
The new system comprises the following services 1.Prevention 2.Reintegration 3.Young Adult Support 4.Fostering 5.Small Family Home RUNNING COSTS OF NEW SYSTEM ALL NEW SERVICES ARE SUPPORTED BY MOBILE TEAM 2 Social workers 1 Psychologist
16
MOBILE TEAM SERVICES CAPACITY (per year) # OF BENEF. (per year) COSTS (travel & direct help) 1.PREVENTION25 families100 6 500 € 2.REINTEGRATION 10 children + their families 40 3 000 € 3. YOUNG ADULT SUPPORT 5 12 000 € 4.FOSTERING25 allowances 23 000 € training, campaigns 5 000 € 5. SMALL FAMILY HOME 20 80 000 € MOBILE TEAM SALARIES (taxes, allowances, office costs) (ANNUALLY) 35 000 € TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS 164500 €
17
SUMMARY COMPARISION OF TWO SYSTEMS TOTAL # OF BENEFICIARIES EACH YEAR TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS COSTS per beneficiary DC MOST75195 660 €2 609 € NEW SYSTEM190164 500 €866 € The new system of services provides better outcomes for children The new system of services is cheaper and more cost effectice. The new system serves more than twice as many beneficiaries annually.
18
ADDITIONAL COSTS Capital investment provided by HHC › Purchase, renovation, furnishing and equipping of small family home – 120 000 euros › Purchase of vehicle for mobile team – 5000 euros Transitional costs provided by Zenica municipality › Covering income lost to DC Most due to decrease in number of children – 16 500 euros
19
CHALLENGE New system cheaper overall and cost effective BUT › Cost bearers changed without formal budget reallocation › Running costs used to be spread between as many as 20 municipal CSWs at any one time – Zenica municipality incurred no direct costs
20
CHALLENGE Running costs of new system are covered by: 1. Municipal CSWs › Allowances for foster carers › Cost of food and clothing for children placed in small family home 2. Zenica municipality › Staff salaries and amenities for small family home 3. Zenica municipality/Zenica-Doboj Canton › Salaries and other costs of mobile team › Direct material support to beneficiaries
21
GORAZDE PROJECT Gorazde canton has no institutions but places children in institutions elsewhere in BiH HHC together with local authorities planning to develop family-based services within the canton for current and future children without parental care and children at risk of separation Services will include prevention, reintegration, fostering, young adult support, small emergency reception centre Services will be supported by a mobile team of 2 professionals
22
GORAZDE PROJECT FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Running costs of current system Institution # of Children Monthly Per Child TOTAL Annual Selo Mira12250 KM36 000 KM Dom Bjelave1326 KM3 912 KM SOS Village Sarajevo 7476 KM39 984 KM SOS Village Gracanica 9476 KM51 408 KM Dom Porodica4550 KM26 400 KM TOTAL33157 704 KM 80 650 €
23
GORAZDE PROJECT FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Running costs of new services Service # of Beneficiaries-annually TOTAL Annual Prevention6010 000 KM Reintegration52 000 KM Fostering1554 000 KM Young Adult Support 67 200 KM Emergency Reception Centre 414 400 KM TOTAL90125 122 KM 63 990 €
24
GORAZDE PROJECT FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Comparison of running costs of current system and running costs of proposed new system COST PER BENEFICIARY TOTAL Annual CURRENT SYSTEM 2 444 € 80 650 € NEW SYSTEM 711 € 63 990 € HHC INVESTMENT IN SETTING UP SERVICES 450 000 KM = 230 000 € ….........................................................................
25
CONCLUSION Two very different DI projects within BiH context – demonstrates that there is no blueprint that can be applied in every situation but each location requires its own unique DI process DI projects in Zenica and Gorazde demonstrate that DI not only provides greatly improved outcomes for children but also that it is financially viable in the BiH context
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.