Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGabriel Ellis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Analysis of Covariance ANCOVA Chapter 11
2
ANOVA Terminology The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of the dose of ginseng 人蔘 (placebo, low, high) on the number of bench press repetitions, while controlling for the energy level of the strength coach. The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of the dose of ginseng 人蔘 (placebo, low, high) on the number of bench press repetitions, while controlling for the energy level of the strength coach. 人蔘 The independent variable dose of ginseng is called a FACTOR. The independent variable dose of ginseng is called a FACTOR. The FACTOR has 3 LEVELS (placebo, low, high) The FACTOR has 3 LEVELS (placebo, low, high) The dependent variable in this experiment is the number of repetitions performed. The dependent variable in this experiment is the number of repetitions performed. Strength coach energy level is a covariate. Strength coach energy level is a covariate.
3
Assumptions of ANOVA Dependent variable is interval or ratio. Dependent variable is interval or ratio. The distributions within groups are normally distributed. The distributions within groups are normally distributed. The variances between groups are equal. The variances between groups are equal.
4
The effects of ginseng on repetitions
5
The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of the dose of ginseng 人蔘 (placebo, low, high) on the number of bench press repetitions, while controlling for the energy level of the strength coach. 15 subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following conditions (placebo, low dose, high dose). Strength coach energy (enthusiasm) was coded as 0 = boring thru 7 = very high enthusiasm. 人蔘
6
StrCoach_Energy as Covariate Check homogeneity of variance if you have a between subjects factor. Choose the Sidak post hoc test.
7
Plot number of repetitions by ginseng dose
8
Check homogeneity of variance if you have a between subjects factor. The null hypothesis is that the groups have equal variance. In this case you retain the null. You don’t want this to be significant, if it is significant you are violating an assumption of ANVOA: homogeneity of variance. The groups DO NOT have equal variance, Levine’s test F(2,27) = 4.618, p =.019 See page 405 of Field for an additional test to check for homogeneity of variance.
9
The Str_Coach energy level was a sig. covariate F(1,26) = 4.959, p =.035. After controlling for the effects of strength coach energy, there the dose of ginseng significantly effected the number of repetitions performed F(2,26) = 4.142, p =.027, power =.68. Look at posthoc tests to find which groups are different. ANCOVA Results
10
Post Hoc Results Placebo is different from High Dose. Low Dose is NOT different from High Dose
11
Effect Size The dose of ginseng explained a bigger proportion of the variance not attributed to other variables than strength coach energy. (see p 415-516).
12
Assumptions of ANCOVA The covariate should be independent from the experimental factor. The covariate should be independent from the experimental factor. Run a single factor ANOVA with the covariate as the dependent variable and the experimental variable as a fixed factor. Run a single factor ANOVA with the covariate as the dependent variable and the experimental variable as a fixed factor. Homogeneity of regression slopes Homogeneity of regression slopes Do a scatter plot of each experimental condition with the covariate on X axis and the dependent variable on the Y axis. Do a scatter plot of each experimental condition with the covariate on X axis and the dependent variable on the Y axis. Run the ANCOVA with a custom model see p 413 – 415. Run the ANCOVA with a custom model see p 413 – 415.
13
Is Covariate Independent of Experimental Factor? Is there a difference in the covariate (Strength Coach) by experimental factor (Dose)
14
Is Covariate Independent of Experimental Factor? No problem. The covariate is independent from the experimental factor (Dose), F(2,27) = 1.98, p =.16
15
Homogeneity of Regression Slopes? Click the Model Button 1.Highlight Dose, StrCoach then click Main Effects. 2.Highlight Dose, StrCoach then click Interaction.
16
Homogeneity of Regression Slopes? Look at the interaction term Dose * StrCoach. You don’t want this to be significant. In this example the effect is significant, therefore we are violating the assumption that the regression slopes are equal.
17
Homework Analyze the Task 1 and Task 2 data sets from the book, see page 419. Do a Sidak post hoc test instead of the planned contrast suggested in the book. Compute the effect size using: Use the Sample Methods and Results section as a guide to write a methods and results section for your homework.
18
Sidak Post Hoc Lacks Power! According to ANOVA F(2,11) = 4.32, p =.041 At least 1 pair should be different, but Sidak lacks power. You can either report this p = 0.052, or run a planned contrast, see the next page for a planned contrast example.
19
Planned Contrast 1-3, 1-2 for HangoverCure Data Set Click Contrasts, Choose Simple, Chose First, Click Change, then Continue. This will run a simple planned contrast of: 1 – 3 and 1 – 2, it does not do 2 – 3.
20
Planned Contrast 1-3, 1-2 Results for HangoverCure Data Set The planned contrast finds the difference between 1-2 at p = 0.018. Where Sidak reported this difference as p = 0.052. This shows that a planned contrast is more powerful than a post hoc test.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.