Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun. Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun. Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign."— Presentation transcript:

1 HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun

2 Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign – Status of all instruments – Changes to aircraft operations for 2013 – Revised strategies based upon lessons learned and changes from 2012 operations – Changes to MTS – Deployment details

3 GH Status and Changes Status (progress with pods, new instruments) 2013 and 2014 schedule Operational constraints (flight duration issues, turn-around time, hazard avoidance, other issues) Fatigue management Changes to the COA (if any)

4 Discussion on Wednesday Forecasting procedures Flight modules & planning Mission scientist’s roles and responsibilities PayMOF operations

5 Flight Modules AV-6 Module Example AV-1 Modules

6 Review of Science Goals Environment: What impact does the Saharan Air Layer (SAL) have on intensity change? How do storms interact with shear produced by large-scale wind systems? In particular, how do horizontal and vertical variations in shear impact intensity change? How does the outflow layer interact with the environment? Inner-core: What is the role of deep convective towers (bursts) in intensity change? – Are they critical to intensification? – How does the low-level wind field respond to convective bursts? – How does the upper-level warm core depend on convective bursts? How do intrusions of dry air impact intensity change? What changes in storm structure occur prior to and during genesis and rapid intensification?

7 Two aircraft: AV-6 = environmental GH AV-1 = over-storm GH Deployments of GHs from the East Coast— Wallops Flight Facility in VA 5 week deployment in 2013 (Aug 20-Sept 23) Currently 4 weeks in 2014 275 flight hours per deployment (10-11 flights) Dots indicate genesis locations. Range rings assume 26-h flights. HS3 Mission Overview 16 h loiter 6 h loiter

8 Environmental Payload NOAA U. Wisc. NASA/GSFC Temperature Relative Humidity Aerosol Backscatter

9 Over-Storm Payload NASA/MSFCNASA/GSFC JPL HIRAD excess T B HIWRAP dBZ and vector winds HAMSR T´

10 Unable to add YES dropsonde system for HS3. Possible piggybacks – GPS surface wind sensors On AV-6 in 2013 – Gamma ray detector On AV-1 New Instruments for 2013 z P y h x Reflection AreaGPS S γ GPS surface winds

11 HS3 in 2012 Challenges – Only 1 storm while at WFF – Dropsondes almost disallowed by FAA – Numerous tech. & logistical challenges – No AV-1 Successes – 1 very persistent storm – Good interactions with FAA/VACAPES – Smooth WFF operations/chase coordination – Great work by forecasters, mission scientists, flight planners, ESPO, & crew Nadine’s track 2126322830

12 AV-1 Prep for 2013-2014 AV-1 did not make the 2012 deployment due to aircraft issues Test flight in Pacific on Nov. 5-6 In addition to HAMSR and HIWRAP, flying HIRAD for the first time OSCAT image from 00 UTC 6 November

13 HS3 Observations of Leslie’s Outflow 7 Sep 2012 1041-1111Z Black, Red, Blue and Pink lines: Global Hawk observed wind speed and temperature profiles along jet maximum from dropsondes Green line: COAMPS-TC model wind speed profile Red line: Satellite wind speed vertical average Solid black: Tropopause Dashed: Cirrus top / jet max Dotted:Cirrus cloud base Yellow shading:Cloud Physics Lidar (CPL) domain Cloud top Cloud base Tropopause Courtesy of P. Black

14 Impact of HS3 Dropsondes for Nadine Track Error (nm)Intensity: Max. Wind Error (kts) Intensity: Min. SLP Error (hPa) Bias (dash) HS3 drops No drops HS3 drops No drops HS3 drops No drops Bias (dash) Dropsonde impact experiments performed for 19-28 Sep. (3 flights) -Blue, with HS3 drops -Red, No drops with synthetics COAMPS-TC Intensity and Track skill are improved greatly through assimilation of HS3 Drops. Courtesy of J. Doyle

15 Best track, NODA, and EnKF-Initialized Forecasts (a) Track (b) Intensity HIWRAP radial velocity assimilation from Hurricane Karl Use same WRF-EnKF system as used at PSU (F. Zhang et al.) Use up to 450 superobs/h (150/h from analysis time and +/- 1 h) Reject any ob. with Vr < 15 m/s or dBZ < 25 Assimilate P/I at 18Z/16 th, then P/I + Vr 19Z through 07Z/17 th Best results from tight flight pattern


Download ppt "HS3 Review and Planning Meeting Scott Braun. Goals of Meeting Review 2012 campaign – Initial science results – Lessons learned Prepare for 2013 campaign."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google