Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPatrick Thompson Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University INTRODUCTION TO MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 13e Anderson Sweeney Williams Martin
2
2 2 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter 5 Advanced Linear Programming Applications n Data Envelopment Analysis n Revenue Management n Portfolio Models and Asset Allocation n Game Theory
3
3 3 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Data Envelopment Analysis n Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is an LP application used to determine the relative operating efficiency of units with the same goals and objectives. n DEA creates a fictitious composite unit made up of an optimal weighted average ( W 1, W 2,…) of existing units. n An individual unit, k, can be compared by determining E, the fraction of unit k ’s input resources required by the optimal composite unit. n If E < 1, unit k is less efficient than the composite unit and be deemed relatively inefficient. n If E = 1, there is no evidence that unit k is inefficient, but one cannot conclude that k is absolutely efficient.
4
4 4 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Data Envelopment Analysis n The DEA Model MIN E s.t.Sum of weights = 1 Weighted composite outputs > Unit k ’s output Weighted composite outputs > Unit k ’s output (for each measured output) Weighted inputs < E [Unit k ’s input] (for each measured input) E, weights > 0 Question : Can we find a combination of units whose output is as much as k unit, but can reduce the input?
5
5 5 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Input n n Output Data Envelopment Analysis
6
6 6 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n About which Hospital? n n Maximizing or minimizing? n n Constraints? How many? n n Decision variables wg, wu, wc, ws : weights for General, University, County, and State hospitals E : Efficient measure for County hospital wg + wu + wc + ws = 1 Full time physician : 48.14wg + 34.62wu + 36.72wc+ 33.16ws >= 36.72 Medicare patients 285.2wg + 162.3wu + 275.7wc + 210.4ws <= 275.7E Data Envelopment Analysis
7
7 7 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Formulaiton Data Envelopment Analysis
8
8 8 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Output Variable Value Reduced Cost E 0.9052379 0.000000 WG 0.2122662 0.000000 WU 0.2604472 0.000000 WC 0.000000 0.9476212E-01 WS 0.5272867 0.000000 Row Slack or Surplus Dual Price 1 0.9052379 -1.000000 2 0.000000 0.2388859 3 0.000000 -0.1396455E-01 4 0.000000 -0.1373087E-01 5 1.615387 0.000000 6 37.02707 0.000000 7 35.82408 0.000000 8 174.4224 0.000000 9 0.000000 0.9606148E-02 Data Envelopment Analysis
9
9 9 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n 이해하기 Data Envelopment Analysis
10
10 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n General Hospital Min = E; wg + wu + wc + ws = 1; 48.14*wg + 34.62*wu + 36.72*wc + 33.16*ws >= 48.14; 43.10*wg + 27.11*wu + 45.98*wc + 56.46*ws >= 43.10; 253*wg + 148*wu + 175*wc + 160*ws >= 253; 41*wg + 27*wu + 23*wc + 84*ws >= 41; 285.2*wg + 162.3*wu + 275.7*wc + 210.4*ws - 285.2*E <= 0; 123.8*wg + 128.7*wu + 348.5*wc + 154.1*ws - 123.8*E <= 0; 106.72*wg+ 64.21*wu + 104.1*wc + 104.04*ws- 106.72*E <= 0; Data Envelopment Analysis n n General Hospital Variable Value Reduced Cost E 1.000000 0.000000 WG 1.000000 0.000000 WU 0.000000 0.4148155 WC 0.000000 1.784315 WS 0.000000 0.000000 Row Slack or Surplus Dual Price 1 1.000000 -1.000000 2 0.000000 0.000000 3 0.000000 0.000000 4 0.000000 -0.2096828E-01 5 0.000000 -0.3805019E-03 6 0.000000 0.000000 7 0.000000 0.000000 8 0.000000 0.8077544E-02 9 0.000000 0.000000
11
11 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Output 값이 최고든지 input 값이 최소이면 E=1 Data Envelopment Analysis
12
12 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. 문제점 Inefficient 한 unit 을 찾아낼 수는 있는데 Efficient unit 은 찾기가 어렵다. output 이든 input 이든 무엇 하나라도 제일 잘하면 (output measure 가 최대이거나 input measure 가 최소 ) 설사 다른 부분에서 매우 Inefficient 해도 나타나지 않는다. Data Envelopment Analysis
13
13 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Fleight legs Fleight Reservation
14
14 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Fares and Demand forcasts Fleight Reservation
15
15 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Maximizing or Minimizing? n n Constraints? How many? n n Decision Variables Pittsburg, Newark, Charlotte, Orlando, Myrtle Beach ODIF code : PCQ, PMQ, POQ, PCY, PMY,... n n Objective function Fleight Reservation
16
16 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Constraints Fleight Reservation
17
17 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Output Fleight Reservation
18
18 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n Output Fleight Reservation
19
19 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. n n What is the soluion? n n How much is the optimal revenue? n n Two weeks earlier than the departure, PMQ( from Pittsburg to Myrtle Beach) reservation is 44. Can you reserve one more seat for PMQ when a customer wants to reserve ? dual prices for 1 & 4 are 4 and 179, it costs 183, but revenue increase is 228. Thus, 228 – 179 = 85. Yes. (read the last paragraph on p.231 about bid price) Fleight Reservation
20
20 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Portfolio Model (p.233) n n Five scenarios (5 previous returns, Year1,..., Year5)
21
21 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Game theory (p.241) n n Two-person, zero-sum game : 2 parties. gain of one party means the loss of the other. n n Pay-off table gain of one party depending upon the strategies that two parties take. Pay-off table is known to both party. n n Maximin strategy n n Minmax regret strategy
22
22 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. End of Chapter 5
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.