Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Medical School Lecture

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Medical School Lecture"— Presentation transcript:

1 Medical School Lecture
Breast Imaging Medical School Lecture November 18, 2015 Susan Peddle, MD Assistant Professor University of Ottawa introduction and overview of the WBHC

2 Disclosure You may only access and use this PowerPoint presentation for educational purposes. You may not post this presentation online or distribute it without the permission of the author.

3 Overall Objectives Review the background and evidence supporting the use of screening mammography, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Describe Canadian population‐based screening programs, their performance indicators and their costs Provide an overview of mammographic abnormalities and their work‐up

4 Objectives Screening versus Diagnostic mammography BI-RADS
Review of mammographic abnormalities that warrant further work-up Diagnostic work-up Features of benign versus malignant lesions on ultrasound Breast Intervention Role of MRI in breast imaging Current recommendations for breast screening

5 Objective 1 Screening versus Diagnostic mammography

6 Screening MG versus Diagnostic MG
Screening MG: to find cancers smaller than those detected at BSE or CBE Sensitivity of BSE: Unknown Sensitivity of CBE: Unknown Sensitivity of screening MG: % Diagnostic MG: to further evaluate a screen detected abnormality, symptom or clinical finding Pain Palpable lump Nipple Discharge Others (skin changes, nipple inversion, shrinking breast, enlarging breast) BSE = breast self exam CBE = clinical breast exam as performed by a medical professional

7 subareolar lactiferous ducts
Mammographic Anatomy lymph node skin pectoralis muscle vessel glandular tissue subareolar lactiferous ducts Every breast has different a composition and relative amounts of fat versus more dense fibroglandular tissue Our ability to detect abnormalities is dependent on composition fat inframammary fold Cooper’s ligaments

8 Typical Mammography Unit

9 Routine Mammographic Views
MLO CC

10 We have to apply maximal compression, which only lasts momentarily, to obtain the best view and minimize overlap

11 MLO CC Outer quadrant Upper quadrant Inner quadrant Lower quadrant
goal of CC is to maximize visibility of medial breast  techs document if patient anxious or would not allow compression Inner quadrant Lower quadrant

12 O’clock Position used for Localization
Right Breast Left Breast 12:00 12:00 Lat 9:00 3:00 Med Med 3:00 Lat 9:00 6:00 6:00

13 Technical Limitations
Breast Density Patient anxiety, discomfort, physical limitations Post-therapeutic changes goal of mammo to pull out breast tissue - these things prevent that

14 Breast Density fatty replaced 0-25% scattered 25-50% heterogeneous
discuss how x-rays work the reason we see things is because two tissues or variable densities are adjacent to each other the best we have, but far from perfect all MG reports comment on breast density to set the stage heterogeneous 50-75% extremely dense 75-100%

15 Objective 2 BI-RADS

16 BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
Helps achieve uniformity in breast imaging reports which improves their clinical utility by communicating findings in a standardized way Help determine clear management

17 BI-RADS 0: Needs further evaluation 1: Normal 2: Benign finding
3: Probably benign 4: Suspicious abnormality 5: Probable cancer 6: Biopsy proven cancer

18 0: Needs further evaluation - additional mammographic views, +/- US, +/- MRI
1: Normal - Return to screening 2: Benign finding - Return to screening 3: Probably benign - > 98% likelihood of being benign. Short interval follow-up recommended in 6 months. 4: Suspicious abnormality - Biopsy needed 4A % likelihood of being malignant 4B % likelihood of being malignant 5: Probable cancer - Biopsy and surgical consultation needed (> 95% likelihood of being malignant) 6: Biopsy proven cancer

19 Objective 3 Review of mammographic abnormalities that warrant further work-up

20 4 Main Mammographic Abnormalities
Microcalcifications Architectural distortion Mass Asymmetries

21 Microcalcifications

22 Microcalcifications image
Microcalcifications can be an indicator of cancer, although they are often benign Detected mammographically Characterized by morphology (appearance), distribution, and change over time Analysis helps radiologist determine the likelihood of underlying benign versus malignant pathology image

23 Terminal Ductal Lobular Unit (TDLU)
Basic functional unit in the breast Consists of acini that drain the terminal duct Terminal ducts drain to larger and larger ducts, and eventually to the nipple

24 TDLU - site of origin of most cancers

25 Lobular Calcifications - form in acini - Intraductal Calcifications
- form in ducts - Due to calcified cellular debris or secretions Almost always benign Suspicious for malignancy

26 Benign Calcifications
Skin Coarse or “Popcorn” Vascular Rim or “Eggshell”

27 Suspicious Microcalcifications
“Variable in size, density and shape” Fine Pleomorphic

28 Suspicious Microcalcifications
“Thin, linear or curvilinear irregular” Fine linear or branching

29 Architectural Distortion

30 Architectural Distortion
Normal architecture is distorted with no definite visible mass Look for abnormal straight lines or spiculations radiating from a point Differential diagnosis: Carcinoma vs scar tissue

31 Right - recurrence with IDC Left - IDC
prior lumpectomy on right compare to previous very important scar - increasing in density or changing in any way - further evaluation essential

32 Right - recurrence with IDC Left - IDC

33 Mass

34 Mass A space occupying 3D lesion seen in two different projections
3 important descriptive terms: Shape Margin Density

35

36 Benign features Suspicious features Round or oval Circumscribed
Low density Suspicious features Irregular Microlobulated, indistinct, spiculated High density

37 Typically Benign

38 Typically Malignant

39 Asymmetries

40 Asymmetries Unilateral deposits of fibroglandular tissue with NO mirror-image correlate in the opposite breast A discrete mass is not seen on the initial MLO and CC views True pathology versus overlapping normal tissue?

41

42 Asymmetry ??

43 Rt MLO Lt MLO

44 Focal Asymmetry

45 Global Asymmetry

46 Objective 4 Diagnostic work-up

47 “Work-up” Refers to additional testing required to determine the origin of an imaging or clinical abnormality Comprised of additional mammographic views, US, MRI and/or biopsy

48 Abnormal Mammogram ? True abnormality Additional mammographic views ? Mass +/- Ultrasound ? Suspicious +/- Biopsy

49 Additional Mammographic Views
Straight lateral or 90 degree view Coned compression views Magnification views Pinched (Eklund) views Rolled view Extended CC view Cleavage view Tomosynthesis

50 Magnification Views Performed for better characterization of microcalcifications Focal spot = 1.6 times 2 views: CC and straight lateral (90 degree)

51 Lt MLO Magnification View Malignant Calcifications: Tightly clustered.
Vary in size and shape. Bizarre branching irregular or linear forms Typically found in DCIS and Invasive Ductal When suspicious calcifications are the only sign of malignancy one may suspect DCIS but invasive ductal can not be excluded by mammography alone. LCIS and Invasive Lobular Cancer do not typically calcify.

52 Coned Compression Views
Performed to differentiate normal overlapping parenchyma from a true abnormality

53 Coned Compression Lesion does not persist on coned compression views in keeping with normal fibroglandular tissue

54 Coned Compression Views
Lesion persists on coned compression views in keeping with a true lesion

55 Ultrasound confirms the presence of a mass suspicious for malignancy

56 Tomosynthesis - New technique created to produce a 3D picture of the breast using X-rays - Designed to reduce overlapping tissues in mammography - Results in high-resolution images at mammographic doses

57 Tomosynthesis 3D 2D Breast Reconstructed planes
If a 2 D image is taken the ovelapping structures, such as a cancer with normal breast tissue, will be difficult to differentiate from each other. X-ray tube moves in an arc across the breast This may lead to false positives and false negatives. With tomosnthesis, the exposures are obtained over a 15 degree arc , an exposure taken every 1 degree yielding 15 individual exposures You need small angle for rapid scan without motion artifact. Objects at different heights in the breast are projected differently at different angles. Projection images are reconstructed to show 1 mm slices of breast tissue. This allows for separation of overlapping structures, and allows for accurate separation of lesions, permitting differentiation of true lesions from underlying tissue. Reconstructed planes

58 Stationary breast platform X-ray tube swings during tomo
Breast tomosynthesis is an imaging technology that acquires 2D projection images of a compressed breast at multiple angles during a sweep of the X-ray tube. ARC ABOVE THE BREAST

59

60 Tomosynthesis

61 Objective 5 Ultrasound features of benign versus malignant lesions

62 Ultrasound how US works - sound transmission real time visibility
allows physical examination at time of imaging

63 Benign vs Malignant Features

64 Simple Cyst Always benign Features: Anechoic (black) No wall
“Through transmission” talk

65 Ultrasound Features of Solid Masses
benign - slow growing, so smooth, pushing borders Classic benign Classic malignan t

66 Benign Breast Lesions Well circumscribed - doesn’t invade
Wider than tall - obeys normal tissue planes Thin echogenic pseudocapsule - compresses adjacent tissue Gentle macrolobulations Intensely echogenic - contains fat

67 Malignant Breast Lesions
Angular margins Spiculations Microlobulations Taller than wide Posterior shadowing Ductal extension/Branch pattern Microcalcifications

68 Margins: Angulated

69 Margins: Microlobulated

70 Ductal extension

71 Shadowing

72 Can we make the diagnosis of cancer based on ultrasound features only?

73 Case 1: 83 yo, palpable mass medial left breast
Case 2: 88 yo, palpable mass UOQ left breast

74 Case 1: 83 yo, palpable mass medial left breast
Case 2: 88 yo, palpable mass UOQ left breast Cancer Fibroadenoma

75 Invasive ductal carcinoma Involuted calcified fibroadenomas

76 Always start with a MG in women 35 years old and greater!

77 Objective 6 Breast Intervention

78 Breast Intervention Tissue diagnosis mandatory for diagnosis of breast cancer In the US, 1 million breast biopsies are performed annually to diagnose 200,000 breast cancers Avoids unnecessary benign surgical excisions and allows surgeons to plan appropriate surgery in the setting of cancer Extremely beneficial for patients and for the health care system in general old school - patient had a lump and it was surgically removed Not so now as our goal is to do the right surgery once to minimize the need for re-excision and to deal with the axilla ( a very hot topic) the first time expedites adjuvant treatment - ie chemo or radiation post-operatively cost of one biopsy is far less than the cost for a surgical excision in the OR

79 Breast Intervention How do we perform breast biopsies?
Ultrasound guided biopsy Solid and complex solid-cystic masses Stereotactic biopsy Suspicious or indeterminate microcalcifications seen on MG Persisting suspicious asymmetries on MG with no sonographic correlate MRI guided biopsy Lesions identified only on MRI with no mammographic or sonographic correlate preference is US biopsy - fast, relatively cheap, more comfortable for patient and allows real-time visibility

80 Ultrasound Guided Biopsy

81

82 Fine needle aspiration
FNA (uncommon) CNB VAD Fine needle aspiration Core Needle Biopsy Vacuum-assisted Device

83

84 Core Biopsy

85 Vacuum Assisted Biopsy

86 Stereotactic Guided Biopsy

87

88 Technique Scout image taken to locate lesion in biopsy window
“Stereo Pair” obtained after moving x-ray tube +15° and −15° relative to 0° position X, Y and Z (depth) coordinates calculated by computer Lots of vendors are needles Key - understand the basic physics of your device

89

90

91 Specimen radiograph confirms microcalcifications in the specimen
Final diagnosis: DCIS

92 Persisting focal asymmetry
Pre biopsy Persisting focal asymmetry Post biopsy

93 Deploy marker clip at the site of biopsy

94 Preoperative Image Guided Localizations

95 Preoperative Image Guided Localizations
Pre-operative localization is used to ensure complete excision of nonpalpable breast lesions Localization device is inserted pre- operatively using mammographic or ultrasound guidance Helps guide the surgeon in the OR, improving clear margin and breast conservation rates

96 MG or Ultrasound Guidance

97 46 yo - Multifocal Disease UOQ

98 2 wires inserted to guide surgical excisions

99 Radioactive Seed Localization
Low-dose I125 titanium prostate seed is placed at the target using mammographic or ultrasound guidance Surgeon uses radioactivity probe to localize, dissect and remove breast lesion Image courtesy of The Mayo Clinic

100 X-ray of lumpectomy specimen to confirm excision
Post-procedure mammogram confirms accurate seed placement adjacent to clip X-ray of lumpectomy specimen to confirm excision

101 Objective 7 Role of MRI in breast imaging

102 Role of MRI in Breast Imaging
MRI has a high sensitivity Main roles include: High risk screening: BRCA 1 and 2 mutation carriers > 25% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer Radiation to anterior chest wall for treatment of lymphoma Local staging of breast cancer Assess response to chemotherapy Problem solving

103 43 yo – BRCA1 carrier June 20, 2012

104 Baseline Screening MRI
Bilateral breast cancer not seen mammographically BILATERAL BREAST CANCER IN BRCA 1 GENE BASELINE MRI

105 Click View then Header and Footer to change this footer
Local Staging with MRI MLO CC Left breast Clinical: • Upper outer quadrant • Palpable abnormality MG: • Pleomorphic microcalcifications (BI-RADS 5) Stereotactic Biopsy: Final diagnosis: DCIS high grade Click View then Header and Footer to change this footer

106 2 min C+ MRI: • Non mass enhancement (arrow) • Additional retroareolar mass (circle) for which US guided biopsy was performed Mastectomy and SLNB were both performed Final pathology: Invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Total extent 8.0 cm) 2 min C+ 2 min MIP

107 Assess response to chemotherapy with MRI
January 2012 July 2012 Post 6 cycles of chemotherapy

108 Objective 8 Current recommendations for breast screening

109 Current Recommendations for Screening
Who should have mammograms? At what age should screening be initiated?

110 Benefits of Screening Mammography
- Reduction in breast cancer mortality by 40% - Lower rate of mastectomy, radiation therapy and axillary lymph node dissection - Less expensive treatment and less time off work

111 Limitations of Screening Mammography...”Harms”
False Negatives 10-20% of breast cancers are only detected at breast self-exam or physical exam False Positives Only 5-40% of lesions are detected at screening and recommended for biopsy Over-diagnosis 11% of cancers found never progress False positives - number of cases detected on screening which lead to biopsy but turn out to be benign 10% recalls per rad - 2% need biopsy of those 40 % cancer, 60% benign - so 1.2% “unnecessary biopsies”

112 CAR Guidelines – Screening Mammography
Asymptomatic women years - Annual screening MG Asymptomatic women years - Every 1-2 years Women over 74 years - Every 1-2 years, if in good health in accordance with ACR

113 When to Start Screening?
- CTFOPH recommends screening women and having a discussion about screening with women 40-49 - OBSP screens women 50-74 - Canadian Association of Radiology, American Cancer Society, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American College Radiology, College Obstetricians and Gynecologists, recommend screening women Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health - published in 2011 Extremely controversial and flawed - no breast cancer specialists; old, out-of -date machinery and single view mammograms used; epidemiologists implementation of the CTFOPH guidelines may save money each year on screening costs, the result will be thousands of unnecessary breast cancer deaths

114 Should I Screen after age 74?
- For all ages, the mortality benefit from mammographic screening begins to be seen 5-7 years after the onset of screening - Mammographic screening can be continued as long as there is reasonable expectation of a life expectancy of at least seven years - Average life expectancy for an 80 year-old woman is 8.6 years which means that the healthiest quartile can be expected to live considerably longer

115 What is the Chance of Developing Cancer between 40-50 years old?
- 1 in 69 women will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in their 40s - Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women < 50 years - There is a very low incidence of breast cancer below age 30 There is no abrupt change at age 50 Annual U.S. breast cancer incidence rates per 100,000 women as a function of age for invasive + in-situ cancers

116 Numbers of Breast Cancers by Age
5% < 40 yrs 18% yrs 23% yrs 26% yrs 28% yrs 18% years 20% for every decade > 40 yrs 77% > 50 years SEER, 2010,

117 No Role for Screening with Ultrasound
Average risk women - Screen with mammography High risk patients - Screen with mammography and MRI

118 Objectives Screening versus Diagnostic mammography BI-RADS
Review of mammographic abnormalities that warrant further work-up Diagnostic work-up Features of benign versus malignant lesions on ultrasound Breast Intervention Role of MRI in breast imaging Current recommendations for breast screening

119 Thank you a special thanks to all the technologists at the breast centre for their expertise I truly feel fortunate to work with such an incredible team


Download ppt "Medical School Lecture"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google