1. 2016 BOND REFERENDUM Parent Advisory Council 11/17/15

2. Guiding question  What can we design to address our facility and programming needs to better achieve our goals of improving childhood literacy, increasing the graduation rate and closing the achievement gap?

3. Last Large-Scale Referendum: 2006  WS/FCS identified $422M in needs in 2006; this was pared down for the $250M bond referendum.  2004-05 Enrollment: 47,850  2014-15 Enrollment: 53,689  2006 Mobile Classrooms: 358  2014 Mobile Classrooms: 465  Middle schools have the greatest percentage of students in mobile classrooms (22 percent)  As we talk about adding capacity at some schools, we are talking about moving students from mobile classrooms to brick-and-mortar classrooms.

4. Age of buildings  17 buildings more than 50 years old  Systems, such as heating, air conditioning, lighting, and roofing are outdated  Program space is outdated

5. Growth and capacity

6. OREd from N.C. State University  Operations Research and Education Library  Institute of Transportation Research and Education  OREd examined student population trends and projections based on interviews with planning agencies, GIS analysis and economic and demographic trends  Similar to county planning, OREd projected growth in the southern and western parts of the county

7. OREd’s Projections

8. Programming, diversity and equity  What is our vision for how our schools look after a successful referendum and building campaign?  How can we use the bond referendum to achieve our goals of early childhood literacy, improved graduation rates and the closing of achievement gaps?  How can we improve choice with the placement of high quality programs to increase diversity and equity?

9. July: Board’s Four Options  Option 1 (broad range)$552,486,883  Option 2 (capacity and age)$333,773,704  Option 3 (early childhood)$284,059,364  Option 4 (middle schools)$267,686,104

10. Ongoing Work  Gathering public feedback through website, emails and meetings with groups such as PAC  Reporting feedback to Board  Board has gone through a series of briefings on parts of the possible bond package  Board has combined projects into one list  Very fluid process as we work toward a final number

11. Timeline  Mid-July: Options shared with Board  August: Collect Board suggestions and feedback  Fall: Public feedback; meet with Forsyth County Commissioners  Winter: Board and staff refine options, select those to present at public forums

12. Timeline  Winter: Public Forums  Spring: Board uses public feedback to finalize request  April: Board approves request to County Commissioners  May/June: Board presents request to County Commissioners to be placed on November 2016 ballot

13. Current List

14. Technology  In past years, we have used bond referendums to update technology in all schools  Classroom solutions and laptop carts  County will not fund devices/equipment with a five- year lifespan over 20 or more years  Work on a cycle to refresh technology  How can we help all schools through a bond referendum?

15. Reshaping Media Centers  Innovative learning centers  Re-imagine media centers at all schools  Increases equity by ensuring that all students are affected by the bond referendum

16. Reshaping Media Centers Presentation Space Research Space Maker Space Collaborative Space

17. Reshaping Media Centers Presentation Space Research Space Maker Space Collaborative Space

18. Discussion: Large Group  What are your thoughts about the projects?  What would you prioritize in these lists?  What would you add or remove from the lists?

19. Discussions: Small Groups  How could we use the bond referendum to affect all schools?