1. DAILY INTRODUCTION October 22 & October 23

2. Standard: Prepare for class debate: Should the greater good of society supersede the rights of an individual? Class Forum #5: Due Sunday 10/24 by 8pm FOUR Achieve Articles with a 75% or higher completion – Due 10/23 Overture Quiz – ONLINE Due 10/23 Honors: Finish reading Chapters 10-12 annotating for continued character and theme development. Quiz next class on chapters 7-12 Class Forum #5: Due Sunday 10/24 by 8pm FOUR Achieve Articles with a 75% or higher completion – Due 10/23

3. Question of the Day ACT

4. A-Day: 27%; B Day: 48% Period 1: 42% Period 3: 14% Period 4: 25% Period 5: 41% Period 7: 50% Period 8: 55% 38% got this question correct RATIONALE

5. If you have ever entered a contest of any sort, you are well aware of the legal requirements, exclusions, and disclaimers that always accompany the contest’s entry form. Many laws today regulate a contest sponsor’s responsibilities to the entrants, and courts are filled with lawsuits asserting with non-compliance on both sides. Which of the following alternatives best replaces the underlined text? A.NO CHANGE B.lawsuits asserting non- compliance C.lawsuits of non-compliance asserting D.non-compliance lawsuits asserting

6. When writing, you should try to eliminate any unnecessary words to make your sentence as concise as possible. Make sure every word in your sentence is there for a purpose. CONCISION!

7. Explanation: “Non-compliance” describes the wrong each side feels the other committed, thus the lawsuits assert “non-compliance on both sides.” This eliminates all answer choices except answer choice…

8. Turn and Talk: In the not too distant future, college freshmen must all become aware of the fact that there is a need for them to make contact with an academic adviser concerning the matter of a major. How would you make this sentence more concise? Soon college freshmen must realize that they need to contact their advisors about their choices of majors. POSSIBLE ANSWER:

9. Word of the Day SAT

10. Bravad o Definition: confident or brave talk or behavior that is intended to impress other people. Pronunciation: [brah-VA-doh] Synonyms: Swag, Machismo, Bombastic “Any fool knows that bravado is always a cover- up for insecurity.” — Bobby Darin Part of speech: Noun Sentence: I tried to show bravado, as I faced my greatest fear, a giant spider, but I ran away screaming Examples: -b-b-b-blustering, swaggering conduct -a-a-a-a pretense of bravery -t-t-t-the quality or state of being foolhardy

11. Standard: SWBAT use direct and indirect characterization in order to create assigned Character Tweets within Act I of “The Crucible.” Honors: SWBAT gain a deeper understanding of Puritan society within the text while debating the legal guardianship of Pearl Prynne. Students will ultimately answer the question: “Should the good of society supersede an individual’s rights?” OBJECTIVES

12. THE CRUCIBLE ACT 1: REVIEW

13. “The Crucible” Act I Vocabulary – Act 1 SAT Words of the Day Good Luck!

14. and CLEAR YOUR DESKS Thankyou PLEASE TAKE OUT: A PENCIL OR PEN

15. Character Review John Proctor Abigail Williams Reverend Hale Reverend Parris Who is the protagonist? Who is the antagonist? Tituba Betty Parris Mary Warren Giles Corey Thinking Back Direct (telling) and Indirect (showing) Characterization: What does the text say about these characters?

16. Thematic Development Hysteria Hysteria Puritanism vs. Individuality Puritanism vs. Individuality Reputation and Integrity Reputation and Integrity Where did you see the following themes developed?

17. THE CRUCIBLE Act I ACT 2: PRE- READNG

18. New Characters:

19. New Themes :

20. Allegory For McCarthyism Narrow-mindedness Mob mentality False accusations Citizens encouraged to “snitch” Punishment of innocents Allegory: A story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one.

21. NEXT CLASS! Should the greater good of society supersede the rights of the individual?

22. Debate Structure Debate the matter, using the following format: Greater Good of SocietyIndividual RightsTiming 1.1 st affirmative speaker 2.2 nd affirmative speaker 3.Affirmative rebuttal 4.Questions for the negative 5.Final affirmative appeal 1.1st negative speaker 2.2nd negative speaker 3.Negative rebuttal 4.Questions for the affirmative 5.Final negative appeal 1.2-4 minutes 2.1-2 minutes 3.2-4 minutes 4.1 minute

23. Debate Rubric 321 ViewpointViewpoints are clear and organized. Most viewpoints are clear.Viewpoints are unclear and disorganized. Use of examples and facts Arguments are supported with facts and examples. Most arguments are supported with facts and examples. Arguments lack factual support. Relevance of supporting arguments All supporting arguments are relevant. Many, but not all, supporting arguments are relevant. Few supporting arguments are relevant. Strength of argument All arguments are strong and convincing. Some arguments are convincing. Arguments are not convincing. Speaking voiceVoice can always be heard. Voice is heard most of the time. Voice is difficult to hear. PreparationStudent is well preparedStudent needs more preparation Student is unprepared to defend argument

24. THE SCARLET LETTER

25. Debate: Who should have custody of Pearl ? Debate the matter, using the following format: Custody= BostonBoston = HesterTiming 1.1 st affirmative speaker 2.2 nd affirmative speaker 3.Affirmative rebuttal 4.Questions for the negative 5.Final affirmative appeal 1.1st negative speaker 2.2nd negative speaker 3.Negative rebuttal 4.Questions for the affirmative 5.Final negative appeal 1.2-4 minutes 2.2-4 minutes 3.1-2 minutes 4.2-4 minutes 5.1 minute

26. Next Class: Reading Quiz: Chapters 7-12 Graffiti Style Gallery Walk Preparation for Socratic Seminar