Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCornelius Harrell Modified over 9 years ago
1
Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3, MD, Paul B. Greenberg 1,2, MD 1 Ophthalmology Section, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI 2 Division of Ophthalmology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 3 Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY 4 Private Practice, Athens, Greece Sources of financial support: none Author financial and proprietary interests: The authors have no financial interests or proprietary interests to disclose.
2
Purpose To investigate the PCI biometry failure rate using the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) in a cohort of patients with visually significant cataract seen in a resident ophthalmology clinic at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center.
3
Background IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) Infrared optical biometry system using partial coherence interferometry for axial length measurement Accuracy within 20 mm Ultrasound is accurate to 100 mm Superior to applanation ultrasound biometry Non-contact IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) Infrared optical biometry system using partial coherence interferometry for axial length measurement Accuracy within 20 mm Ultrasound is accurate to 100 mm Superior to applanation ultrasound biometry Non-contact
4
Background Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) has an 8- 22% failure rate due to a variety of causes such as mature cataracts, inability to fixate secondary to macular degeneration, tremor, keratopathy, nystagmus, and vitreous hemorrhage 1,2,3,4. The new composite IOLMaster Version 5 software has demonstrated a failure rate of 7.4%, mostly due to posterior subcapsular cataracts 5. There have been few studies on the efficacy of PCI in a teaching hospital setting. Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) has an 8- 22% failure rate due to a variety of causes such as mature cataracts, inability to fixate secondary to macular degeneration, tremor, keratopathy, nystagmus, and vitreous hemorrhage 1,2,3,4. The new composite IOLMaster Version 5 software has demonstrated a failure rate of 7.4%, mostly due to posterior subcapsular cataracts 5. There have been few studies on the efficacy of PCI in a teaching hospital setting.
5
Methods After obtaining IRB approval, the biometric measurements of 147 consecutive patients (165 eyes) who had resident-performed cataract surgery at a VA Medical Center from September 2007 to June 2008 were examined.
6
Results Thirty-nine patients (42 eyes) were excluded due to a lack of preoperative cataract history and physical in the electronic medical record. One hundred and eight patients One hundred and eight patients (123 eyes) met the inclusion criteria: 106 patients were male (98.1%); mean age was 72.4 (range 50-91). Thirty-nine patients (42 eyes) were excluded due to a lack of preoperative cataract history and physical in the electronic medical record. One hundred and eight patients One hundred and eight patients (123 eyes) met the inclusion criteria: 106 patients were male (98.1%); mean age was 72.4 (range 50-91).
7
37.4% Forty-six eyes (37.4%) were documented PCI failures that required immersion A-scan for axial length determination. version 5 The subgroup of eighty-eight eyes that had IOLMaster version 4 readings had a failure rate of 43.2% while the subgroup of thirty-five eyes with IOLMaster version 5 readings had a significantly lower failure rate of 22.9% (OR = 0.38, p < 0.05). 37.4% Forty-six eyes (37.4%) were documented PCI failures that required immersion A-scan for axial length determination. version 5 The subgroup of eighty-eight eyes that had IOLMaster version 4 readings had a failure rate of 43.2% while the subgroup of thirty-five eyes with IOLMaster version 5 readings had a significantly lower failure rate of 22.9% (OR = 0.38, p < 0.05). Results
8
All PCI failures were due to dense cataract; the type of cataract was not specified. Eyes that successfully underwent PCI had significantly better mean preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.48 (20/60) than those requiring immersion A-scan, which had a mean preoperative BCVA of 1.4 (<20/400) (p = 0.01). All PCI failures were due to dense cataract; the type of cataract was not specified. Eyes that successfully underwent PCI had significantly better mean preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.48 (20/60) than those requiring immersion A-scan, which had a mean preoperative BCVA of 1.4 (<20/400) (p = 0.01).
9
Limitations Retrospective nature Variability in measurements secondary to different resident physicians performing PCI Small sample size Large number of exclusions due to incomplete electronic medical records Inability to analyze the PCI failures in terms of type of cataract because of lack of documentation. Retrospective nature Variability in measurements secondary to different resident physicians performing PCI Small sample size Large number of exclusions due to incomplete electronic medical records Inability to analyze the PCI failures in terms of type of cataract because of lack of documentation.
10
Conclusions PCI biometry failure rate is still significant in the veteran population due to dense cataracts, though the new Version 5 software does appear to decrease this rate. Poor preoperative vision is a predictor of PCI failure. We look forward to continued improvements in PCI that will facilitate pre-operative biometry in cases of advanced cataract in teaching hospital settings. PCI biometry failure rate is still significant in the veteran population due to dense cataracts, though the new Version 5 software does appear to decrease this rate. Poor preoperative vision is a predictor of PCI failure. We look forward to continued improvements in PCI that will facilitate pre-operative biometry in cases of advanced cataract in teaching hospital settings.
11
References 1 Narvaez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, et al. Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2008;39(1):30-4. 2 Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graef’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765-73. 3 Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 2002;16:552-6. 4 Ueda T, Taketani F, Ota T, et al. Impact of nuclear cataract density on postoperative refractive outcome: IOL Master versus ultrasound. Ophthalmologica 2007;221:384-87. 5 Hill W, Angeles R, Otani T. Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:920-924. 1 Narvaez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, et al. Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2008;39(1):30-4. 2 Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, et al. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graef’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:765-73. 3 Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations. Eye 2002;16:552-6. 4 Ueda T, Taketani F, Ota T, et al. Impact of nuclear cataract density on postoperative refractive outcome: IOL Master versus ultrasound. Ophthalmologica 2007;221:384-87. 5 Hill W, Angeles R, Otani T. Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:920-924.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.