1. UNFCCC secretariat William Kojo Agyemang-Bonsu, Manager, Non-Annex I Support sub-programme, Mitigation, Data and Analysis Programme Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions by Developing Country Parties Overview of the Agreed Outcome Pursuant to Bali Action Plan and status of participation by developing countries

2. Outline Background Overview of the agreed outcome  Issues relating to reporting  Issues relating to NAMAs Overview of submitted NAMAs (FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.1/Rev.2)

3. Bali Action Plan: A comprehensive process to enable the full, effective and sustained implementation of the Convention through long- term cooperative action Enhanced Action on Mitigation: NAMAs in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity-building, in a measurable, reportable and verifiable manner

4. Overview of the agreed outcome MRV framework Reporting NAMAs Main components for mitigation actions by developing countries are: 1/CP.16, 2/CP.17, 1/CP.18, and 24/CP.18 Agreed Outcome consists of the following decisions Negotiations under the AWGLCA concluded in Doha

5. Overview of the agreed outcome: Reporting (I) National communications every four years Biennial update reports (BUR)  Guidelines adopted by the COP at its 17 th session – Annex III to decision 2/CP.17  First round of BUR to be submitted developing countries by December 2014, with flexibility for SIDS and LDCs International Consultations and Analysis  Non-intrusive, non-punitive and respectful of national sovereignty  Aim to increase the transparency of mitigation actions and their effects  To be conducted as workshops for facilitative exchange of views under the SBI, open to all Parties  First rounds of ICA will be conducted commencing within 6 months of the submission of first round of BURs – June 2015  Modalities and guidelines adopted by the COP at 17 th session – Annex IV to decision 2/CP.17

6. Overview of the agreed outcome: Reporting (II) Follow up work under the Subsidiary bodies Guidelines for domestic MRV is being developed by the SBSTA Composition, modalities and procedures of the team of technical experts (to undertake the analysis of the BURs from developing countries) is being developed by the SBI

7. Overview of the agreed outcome: NAMAs Developing country Parties will take NAMAs in the context of sustainable development, supported and enabled by technology, financing and capacity- building, aimed at achieving a deviation in emissions relative to ‘business as usual’ emissions in 2020

8. Overview of the agreed outcome: NAMAs Two avenues for work on NAMAs by developing countries: a)Decision 1/CP.16, para. 50 (open invitation):  Compilation of NAMAs (FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2)  SBI work programme on NAMAs for 2013-2014 b)Registry (individual NAMAs)  Recording of NAMAs seeking international support  Recording of individual NAMAs for recognition  Recording support available/provided  Facilitate matching of the actions with support  Prototype of the registry was deployed in April 2013  Functional registry (dynamic web-based) version which open to the public was also deployed 16 October 2013.

9. Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 Contains the following NAMAs:  From FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/INF.1  From FCCC/AWGLCA/2012/MISC.2 and Add.1  NAMAs communicated by Burkina Faso, Dominican Republic, Gambia, Guinea, Kyrgyzstan and Cook Islands.

10. Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 57 Parties and the African Group have submitted NAMAs, corresponding to approximately 37.5% of all developing countries. The global break down in absolute numbers and in percent by region is:

11. Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 Participation at regional level (approximately)

12. Overview of FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.12/Rev.2 Characteristics of NAMAs:  National goals and strategies: 35.1 %  Sectoral policies and/or programmes: 17.5%  Lists of projects: 38.6%  Other: 8.7:

13. Thank you