Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Thomas J. Waltz Eastern Michigan University. 2 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Thomas J. Waltz Eastern Michigan University. 2 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS."— Presentation transcript:

1 Thomas J. Waltz Eastern Michigan University

2 2

3 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS

4 $750 $995 $875 $985 4 $500 or Immediately $1000 in 1 week or Immediately $1000 in 1 week or Immediately $1000 in 1 week or Immediately $1000 in 1 week or Immediately $1000 in 1 week X X X X X

5 5

6 $750 $781 $875 $813 6 $500 or Immediately $1000 in 1 year or Immediately $1000 in 1 year or Immediately $1000 in 1 year or Immediately $1000 in 1 year or Immediately $1000 in 1 year X X X X X

7 7

8 8

9 9

10 10 Actual Value Value where preference reverses

11 11

12

13 Theoretical models:  Addiction  Anxiety  Depression  Suicidal behavior  Borderline personality disorder  Antisocial personality disorder  Experiential avoidance  Psychopathology A defining characteristic of:  ADD/ADHD  Schizophrenia  Mood disorders  Situationally predisposed anxiety disorders  Conduct disorders  Substance abuse  Eating disorders  Habit disorders Relationship to Psychopathology

14 14

15 15

16 Convenience Immediate Certain Low effort Historically favorable Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS

17 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS “Managing” immediate experience Acting consistent with values in presence of discomfort VS

18 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS Literal &/or immediate stimulus functions of language Broader, nonliteral orientation to languaging (delay; S D /S ∆ ) VS

19 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS Reacting to attention narrowing contingencies Attending to the broader context of current action (selective multiple control) VS

20  Discounting: steeper curves for several clinical populations—most studied in substance abuse  AAQ-2: higher scores associated with many forms of psychological distress ◦ Negative reinforcement-based coping with immediate aversive experiences  Following data uses non-treatment seeking college student volunteers

21 $1000 Delay Discounting

22 22

23

24  Discounting fits neatly with a contextual behavioral account of clinical presentations  Non-clinical (college) samples produce a wide range of curves, but these do not reliably relate to the AAQ-2  Clinical content specific discounting assessments hold promise of having greater clinical relevance than monetary discounting


Download ppt "Thomas J. Waltz Eastern Michigan University. 2 Relatively small & convenient outcome Relatively large & inconvenient outcome VS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google