1. Asia Pacific and Eastern Europe Regional Workshop on NAMAs Domestic Measuring Reporting and Verification Allison Towle & Daniela Carrington 13 June 2015  Bonn, Germany

2. Presentation Outline  Why us? Why are we in a position to speak about domestic MRV?  What does the data say?  What are countries doing and how can we learn from them?  Lessons learned

3. Low Emission Capacity Building (LECB) Programme (2011-16) Objective: Build capacities to design and implement low emission development through national mitigation actions in the public and/or private sectors in 25 countries Five main work areas:  GHG inventory management systems  Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs)  Low-Emission Development Strategies (LEDS)  Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV)  Participation of selected industries in mitigation actions Donors: European Commission, Germany & Australia

4.  In 2014 a study was commissioned  This paper is a result from: a questionnaire sent to all LECB countries, follow-up discussions, and in-person country visits  17 of 25 countries responded, covering all geographic regions  Based on the results of these processes, four countries were selected for detailed case studies Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) - Technical paper

5. Why is MRV Important?  MRV enables governments to meet a variety of domestic and international objectives  Domestically  Understand key emissions sources and sinks  Design effective mitigation strategies  Assess impacts of mitigation projects and policies  Track progress toward mitigation goals  Meet stakeholder demands for public disclosure of GHG information  Internationally  Meet international reporting obligations under UNFCCC  Build trust  Track global emissions and emissions reductions

6. OVERALL SYSTEMS DESIGN Domestic Measuring Reporting and Verification

7. Countries are often developing more than one level of MRV Of the countries who responded almost all were using at least one level of MRV

8. A large proportion of MRV systems will not just be measuring GHG emissions

9. MRV systems are often being designed to inform multiple international mechanisms

10. GOVERNANCE

11. Most systems require input from multiple sources –inter-agency coordination is vital

12. Very few systems are supported by national legislation/regulation

13. DATA COLLECTION & FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS

14. Most countries are using new and existing data

15. A range of existing data sources are being deployed – but there are more opportunities

16. Few countries have included QA/QC processes in their systems design

17. A few examples: Ghana’s Integrated Climate Data Management System & Chile’s National NAMA MRV Framework

18. Ghana’s Integrated Climate Data Management System Objectives: Provide reliable basis for climate change planning Serve as a framework for M&E and MRV Integrate with the national statistics platform Key elements: Climate data managemen t Continuous data generation Network for sharing & clearing house Documentatio n & archiving IT infrastructur e and applications They keep it simple but aim at consistent improvement towards “dynamic climate data management system” in the future. Before they start they clearly define: (a) why we need documentation, (b) what to document, (c) how to document, (d) who documents, (e) where/how to store and retrieve

19. On-line Climate Date – Three Interfaces

20. Lessons LearnedChallenges Executive level governance frameworks are a valuable alternative to legislation/regulation No need to reinvent the wheel.: Existing data sources are a valuable resource for both national and NAMA level MRV systems Augmenting existing data collection process can provide a valuable means to collect new activity data Find a way to engage others Adopting a systems-based approach is important for effective MRV Slow pace in establishing “data sharing network”. Difficulty in data sharing Data generation can be expensive. Funding is a problem. Involvement from the private sector. Data confidentiality can be an issue for Industry and private held companies Setting up stand-alone IT infrastructure and maintenance can be expensive.

21. What is Chile doing on MRV and how?

22. MRV of domestic NAMAs 22

23. Lessons Learned  Be expansive & strategic in your design, but implement incrementally  There is no ‘recipe book’ for MRV – apply existing guidance to your circumstances  The IPCC Guidelines and Guidance are your friends – make use of their collective wisdom  Knowledge Networks - look for opportunities to cooperate and share experiences

24. Thank you Form more information visit: www.lowemissiondevelopment.org Email: lowemission@undp.orglowemission@undp.org