1. Learning by “Leaning In”: An Out-of-Classroom Leadership Development Initiative Presented by: Dr. Karen Stock Dr. Julie Szendrey In collaboration with: Mrs. Stacy Hilterbrand, Prof. Mary Ann Sponseller, & Prof. Beth Vazzano The DeVille School of Business Walsh University North Canton, OH

2. Polling the Audience What is the current environment on your campus for women students? Do any programs currently exist to specifically develop leadership among women?

3. The Agenda Background Objectives Five Sessions Methodology Research Hypotheses & Results Future Considerations References

4. Background Recognized a need and opportunity – Develop leadership skills within students – Especially undergraduate females

5. Background Presented idea to Business Student Advisory Board Began with 5 colleagues and 2 students −“Lean In” themed events −2013-2014 academic year −www.leanin.orgwww.leanin.org −Discussion Guide −Video Resources

6. Objectives 1)Encourage participants, particularly females, to “speak up” in academic/leadership situations, 2)Increase confidence levels (self-efficacy) of participants, 3)Increase social connection and involvement of participants, and 4)Increase initiative in leadership positions of participants

7. Session 1 September event: Career Success, Challenges, and Recommendations from a female CFO, opening survey (37 attendees)

8. Session 2 November event: Mid-Level female professionals from the accounting, legal, and engineering (36 attendees)

9. Session 3 January event: Negotiations with Chief Communications Officer and Attorney (29 attendees)

10. Session 4 March event: Luncheon as part of Walsh “Women Who Rock” week (15 attendees)

11. Session 5 April event: Advice for graduates, “Ban Bossy” campaign, closing survey, (18 attendees)

12. Methodology Test Group Attended 2 or more events n = 17 Control Group Attended no events n = 24 Survey method 95% confidence level Pretest vs. Posttest Means Comparison Pretest: Session 1 (Fall 2013) Posttest: Session 5 (Spring 2014)

13. Perceptions & Behaviors of Leadership Roles Perceptions of Leadership Roles – Scale items from Spralls et al. (2010) Q10-Q14 on survey – Overall, how involved are you with activities on and off campus? – How important is it to be involved on and off campus? – How would you describe yourself? (Likert: Shy/Very Outgoing) – How much leadership experience do you have? – How important do you consider leadership skills to be?

14. Perceptions & Behaviors of Leadership Roles Actual Engagement in Organizations – Zaccardi et al. (2012) Q15-Q18 on survey – How many organizations are you involved with? – Do you actively serve in a club leadership role? – Are you a proactive leader in group work? – How many outside organizations do you network with?

15. New General Self-Efficacy Scale (NGSE) General self-efficacy relates to… “one’s estimate of one’s overall ability to perform successfully in a wide variety of achievement situations, or to how confident one is that she or he can perform effectively across different tasks and situations” (p. 62) Chen et al. (2001) eight item scales was used – Q19-Q26 on survey

16. Research Hypotheses H1: Level of involvement with on and off-campus organizations H2: Importance of on and off-campus involvement H3: Level of outgoingness H4: Level of leadership experience H5: Importance of leadership skills

17. Research Hypotheses H6: Number of organizational involvement H7: Number of outside organizations networked with H8: Level of self-efficacy H9: The percentage of individuals serving in a club leadership role will increase after participating in the Lean In Program H10: Participants will become more proactive leaders in group work

18. Hypotheses ResultsPre vs Post PartPre vs. Post% # of StudentsPart vs. Control p-value (one-tail)Mean % Changewith Increasep-value (one-tail) H1: Increased Involvement 0.359 0.0223.53% H2: On/off campus Involvement 0.387 -0.0111.76% H3: Outgoingness 0.215 0.0323.53% H4: Level of Leadership Experience 0.149 0.0647.06% H5: Importance of Leadership Skills 0.166 0.0217.65% H6: Increase # of Org Involvement 0.068 -0.0911.76% H7: Increase # of Outside Orgs Network 0.009 0.3658.82% 0.068 H8: Level of Self-Efficacy 0.006 0.0570.59%0.425 H9: % of Individuals in Club Leader Role0.400-0.11-5.88% H10: More Proactive Leaders In Groups 0.500 0.0023.53%

19. Discussion of Results Lean In participants reported a higher level of leadership involvement over the control group for all categories tested – More leadership focused to begin with in general For Lean In participants – 8 of the 10 variables tested showed an increase pre vs. post test – Two of the increases were determined to be statistically significant Increase number of outside organizations networked with (p=.009) Reported level of self-efficacy (construct) (p=.006) – Comparing these to change in the control group: Increased number of outside orgs networked (p=.068, almost stat signif.) Reported level of self-efficacy (p=.425, not stat signif.) Lean In events increase level of networking Lean In events positively influenced leadership tendencies

20. Thank you! Question and Discussion – Takeaways? – Suggestions for our research? Contact Information – Dr. Julie Szendrey (2 e’s in last name) Professor of Business Administration Walsh University 2020 East Maple St. North Canton, OH 44720 jszendrey@walsh.edu – Dr. Karen Stock Assistant Professor of Business Administration Walsh University 2020 East Maple St. North Canton, OH 44720 kstock@walsh.edu

21. References Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. Kuh, G. (1993). In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 277-304. Kuh, G. (1995). The other curriculum: Out-of-class experiences associated with student learning and personal development. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 123-155. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Sandberg, S. (2014). Lean in for graduates. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Spralls III, S. A., Garber, M. S., Divine, R. L., & Trotz, H. (2010). Needs assessment of university leadership programs. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(1), 20-35. Zaccardi, M. C., Howard, C. M., & Schnusenberg, O. (2012). Student preparation and personality traits in the job market. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16 (Special Issue), 35-53.