Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBritton Hunt Modified over 9 years ago
1
JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting / JSPS Core to Core Seminar Analysis Status of Heavy targets data of HES-HKS 9May2012 – 11May2012 Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku Univ. Toshiyuki Gogami HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20121
2
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20122
3
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary H2OH2O 52 Cr CH 2 12 C Targets after the experiment HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20123
4
Data Summary JLab E05-115 (2009/June – 2009/Nov) HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20124
5
e, e + background in GEANT simulation Vacuum chamber (sus304) NMR port (sus304) KDC1KDC2 e -, e + Generated particle : e + Distribution : spherical uniform Momentum : 860 – 1000 [MeV/c] Angle : 0 – 2 [mrad] 1000 events e+e+ HKS HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20125
6
Rates of the HKS TOF detectors HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20126
7
Multiplicity of typical layer of chamber HES HKS ~1.13 ~1.28 ~2.24 ~4.94 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20127
8
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/20128
9
Discrepancy of Number of Λ (Before new tracking code adoption) Lost events that we are interested in in tracking procedure. HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track Black : hit wires Blue : selected wires Red : track REAL DATA ΛΛ Σ0Σ0 Σ0Σ0 CH 2 Target H 2 O Target 12 C quasi-free Acc. b.g. 16 O quasi-free Acc. b.g. Very preliminary 9-11/May/20129
10
HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami Results of Introduction of new Tracking Code Increased ! CH 2 52 Cr H2OH2O 9-11/May/201210
11
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201211 Event display of HES detectors
12
Drift Chamber plane efficiency Other requirements – HKS 1X & 1Y & 2X – HES EH1 & EH2 No YES Extracted Track HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201212
13
Tracking efficiency HES (EDC1) – 8/10 ・・・・・・ HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201213
14
Analyzed runs * ch2 76323 76324 76325 76326 76327 76376 76377 76378 76379 76380 *h2o 75902 75903 75904 75908 75909 75971 75972 75973 75974 75975 *li 76197 76198 76199 76200 76201 76271 76272 76273 76274 76275 *be 76589 76590 76591 76592 76594 76629 76630 76631 76632 76633 *b 76124 76125 76126 76127 76128 76285 76286 76287 76288 76289 *c 75951 75952 75953 75954 75967 76839 76840 76841 76842 76843 *cr1 75997 75998 75999 76000 76001 76016 76017 76018 76019 76020 *cr2 77098 77099 77100 77101 77102 77120 77121 77122 77123 77124 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201214
15
Tracking efficiency 1 ….!? Need to check the tracking code HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201215 ~~~~ HKS (5/6 & 5/6)~~~~~~~ ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.998974 +- 0.00760814 (0.761596%) h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 0.961109 +- 0.00190445 (0.198152%) li : Tracking Efficiency : 0.996378 +- 0.0205954 (2.06703%) be : Tracking Efficiency : 0.995274 +- 0.00535923 (0.538468%) b : Tracking Efficiency : 0.99921 +- 0.00912634 (0.913356%) c : Tracking Efficiency : 0.987929 +- 0.00179032 (0.181219%) cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.974892 +- 0.00304261 (0.312097%) cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 0.965851 +- 0.00320905 (0.332251% ) ~~~~ HES (8/10) ~~~~~~~ ch2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00527844 (0.527844%) h2o : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00095474 (0.095474%) li : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.0172701 (1.72701%) be : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00419163 (0.419163%) b : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00820523 (0.820523%) c : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00153384 (0.153384%) cr1 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00100727 (0.100727%) cr2 : Tracking Efficiency : 1 +- 0.00103985 (0.103985%) If there is a bias to use 10/10, 9/10 and 8/10 are possible to be thrown.
16
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201216
17
Events which are discarded 52 Cr, 77124 KDC1 KDC2 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201217
18
Events which are discarded 52 Cr, 77124 KDC1 KDC2 Where and why are these events discarded ? Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? Where and why are these events discarded ? Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201218
19
Events which are discarded 52 Cr, 77124 KDC1 KDC2 Where and why are these events discarded ? Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? Where and why are these events discarded ? Are these events threw away by correct cut condition? h_pattern_recognition.f ~10% up HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201219
20
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201220
21
x-t function calibration |Wire center – Track coordinate| s 0 Wire center Track coordinate Black : |WC-TC| Magenta : Profile of |WC-TC| Green : x-t calc. Track Drift distance Fitting Function HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201221
22
x-t calibration for 52 Cr Target Residuals better – KDC1 ; 400 [μm] 300 [μm] Number up – ~10% increased at χ 2 <20 – (~5% increased without χ 2 cut) χ 2 cut condition HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201222
23
Contents 1.Data summary & rate conditions 2.Improvement we did for high multiplicity data 3.What need to be done – Tracking code of HES – Optimization of cut conditions in the tracking stage – Parameter tune ( x-t function of drift chambers ) 4.Summary HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201223
24
Summary & What we need to do Parameter tune – x-t function calibration – TOF counters calibration Cut condition optimization – Optimization of the cuts in the tracking code Tracking code of HES – Too good tracking efficiency Prefer 10/10 events ? Estimate hidden efficiencies – Miss identification rate in the tracking stage By using GEANT simulation – Trigger efficiency (TOF, AC over kill, TUL.....) HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201224
25
END JLab E05-115 collaboration, 2009, JLab Hall-C HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201225
26
Rates of the KDC Layers CH 2, 76314 KDC1 KDC2 ~3 MHz ~6 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201226
27
Rates of the KDC Layers H 2 O, 75971 KDC1 KDC2 ~10 MHz ~20 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201227
28
Rates of the KDC Layers 52 Cr, 76314 KDC1 KDC2 ~11 MHz ~22 MHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201228
29
Rates of the KDC wires CH 2, 76314 Wire Number Rate [kHz] KDC1-u KDC1-u’KDC1-xKDC1-x’KDC1-vKDC1-v’ KDC2-u KDC2-u’KDC2-xKDC2-x’KDC2-vKDC2-v’ < 150 kHz < 120 kHz < 70 kHz < 60 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201229
30
Rates of the KDC wires H 2 O, 75971 Wire Number Rate [kHz] KDC1-u KDC1-u’KDC1-xKDC1-x’KDC1-vKDC1-v’ KDC2-u KDC2-u’KDC2-xKDC2-x’KDC2-vKDC2-v’ < 450 kHz < 270 kHz < 250 kHz < 200 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201230
31
Rates of the KDC wires 52 Cr, 77124 Wire Number Rate [kHz] KDC1-u KDC1-u’KDC1-xKDC1-x’KDC1-vKDC1-v’ KDC2-u KDC2-u’KDC2-xKDC2-x’KDC2-vKDC2-v’ < 510 kHz < 350 kHz < 290 kHz < 230 kHz HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201231
32
x-t calibration for H 2 O Target Residual better Number up – 10% increased at χ 2 <20 HES/HKS collaboration meeting, T.Gogami9-11/May/201232
33
Singles rate summary Up to ~30 [MHz] Up to ~15 [MHz] HES HKS HKS trigger ~ 10[kHz] HES trigger ~ a few[MHz] HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami33
34
B.G. mix rate (real data) a b * hks ntulpe HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami34
35
e + simulation SIMULATION To see 1.Number of event 2.Angle & momentum of e + generated in target To see 1.Number of event 2.Angle & momentum of e + generated in target HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami35
36
Target thickness dependence (Simulation) H2OH2O 52 Cr 9 Be 12 C CH 2 10 B 7 Li Consistent with B.G. mix rate ! SIMULATION HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami36
37
Tracking in HKS (pattern recognition) Make combination of hit wire belong to one space point for tracking pre tracking 1.Test point 2.Space point x y x y HKS-HES Collaboration Meeting, T.Gogami37
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.