Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1

2 2 The “selection” problem Program OutcomeChoice to participate When happens when people are given the choice to participate in a program? When do problems arise? How do we estimate program impact in this case?

3 3 Microfinance example of bias from selection Not an Entrepreneur Entrepreneur No Loan3015 Takes a Loan2035 Not an Entrepreneur Entrepreneur No Loan$10$20 Takes a Loan$10$20 Number of people per category Average weekly income per category The loan appears to have an impact even when we know it didn’t!

4 4 Charter school example

5 5 Propensity score matching Program OutcomeThis is the “propensity” Selection bias is just another case of omitted variable bias

6 6 Propensity score matching ID#AgeGroupOutcomeProgram? #140Blue$750 #243Blue$641 #354Blue$690 #423Red$320 #541Red$490 #638Red$871

7 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNn_oJwZ2sg&feature=related

8 8 Probability Models Age Program? 1 0 Age 1 0 Program? Linear Probability Model (OLS) Logit Model These models predict the probability of participation in the program, i.e. the “propensity” of an individual

9 9 Propensity score matching ID#AgeRaceOutcomeProgram?Predicted Propensity #140Blue$7500.87 #243Blue$6410.98 #354Blue$6900.45 #423Red$3200.53 #541Red$4901.02 #638Red$8711.11 We add a variable for the predicted propensity score. Remember not to use your outcome in your propensity score calculations.

10 10 Propensity score matching ID#AgeRaceOutcomeProgram?Predicted Propensity #140Blue$7500.87 #243Blue$6410.98 #354Blue$6900.45 #423Red$3200.53 #541Red$4901.02 #638Red$8711.11 Then matches are made to form a synthetic control group: #5 #6 #2 #1

11 Harry Potter Example 11 Propensity Score

12 Harry Potter Example 12

13 Harry Potter Example 13

14 How do we know matching has been successful? 14

15 What are the problems with Propensity Scores? 15 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg7gxAG8YS4&feature=related

16 What are the problems with Propensity Scores? 16 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zg7gxAG8YS4&feature=related You can only match on observables!

17 17 “Marriage is one of the most important institutions affecting people’s life and well- being…This commitment has positive effects, for instance on spouses’ health and their earnings on the labor market.” Married people are happier... So we should get married to be happy, right? Marriage and happiness (Stutzer & Frey 2006)

18 18 Marriage and happiness “Is marriage an institution for the happy and joyful crowd that finds a partner? This question summarizes the selection hypothesis in research on marriage and well-being. It proposes that those who get married are intrinsically happier people.” “In order to test the selection hypothesis, we follow a simple approach and compare two different groups of singles. The level of subjective well-being of singles who marry later in life is contrasted with the well-being of those who stay single, controlling for numerous observable characteristics.” For any given age, a comparison of the average life satisfaction in these two groups indicates systematic heterogeneity to some extent. However, it has to be taken into consideration that the years immediately before marriage might not be representative for a person’s intrinsic happiness level. People might live in a marriage-like relation, as cohabitants, thinking and planning their joint future in a loving relationship. As these years end in marriage, they are more likely to be the best years in life.

19 19 Marriage and happiness Married Young Married Later Never Married

20 20 Marriage and happiness Does this gap represent the happiness bump?

21 21 Marriage and happiness “For any given age, a comparison of the average life satisfaction in these two groups indicates systematic heterogeneity to some extent. However, it has to be taken into consideration that the years immediately before marriage might not be representative for a person’s intrinsic happiness level. People might live in a marriage-like relation, as cohabitants, thinking and planning their joint future in a loving relationship. As these years end in marriage, they are more likely to be the best years in life.”

22 Marriage and happiness Bummer…


Download ppt "Selection Models Evaluation Research (8521) Prof. Jesse Lecy 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google