1. UM Center for Contextual Psychology dedicated to World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson

2. Detecting biases

3. Self-Report

4. Implicit Association Test World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding HumanAlien Me Not Me

5. Implicit Association Test HumanAlien Not MeMe HumanAlien Not MeMe World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

6. Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure

7. Participants Excluded

8. Alternative Input Methods

9. Purpose Input type? clearer data

10. Two Studies IV Device DV Inclusion Useable Trials % Correct DV LatencyFluencyBias

11. Procedure IRAP Keyboard Alternative/ Switches Alternative/ Switches Keyboard Informed Consent

12. Stimuli

13. Data Analysis Strategy Keyboard Other Device

14. Alt Keyboard World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

15. Alt Keyboard Participants 21 9 Male12 female

16. Alt Keyboard Participants 21 11 Keyboard First 10 Alternative First

17. Alt Keyboard Participants 21 14 Caucasians 2 Asian 5 African American

18. Alt Keyboard Participants 21 17 Christian 0 Muslim 1 Other2 Atheist 1 Agnostic

19. Results World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

20. Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Keyboard 1 Alternative 2

21. World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

23. % Correct on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 43%

24. Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 33%

25. Fluency on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 67%

26. Less Bias World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 61.95% 38.05%

27. Switches World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

28. Switch Participants 21 6 Male15 female

29. Switch Participants 21 10 Keyboard First 11 Alternative First

30. Switch Participants 21 8 Caucasian s 13 African Americans

31. Switch Participants 21 18 Christian 0 Muslim 2 Other 1 Agnostic

32. Number of Participants Not Meeting Inclusion Criteria World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Keyboard 2 Switches 1

33. World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding % of Participants with More Useable Trials by Input Type 95%

34. % Correct on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

35. Average Latency of Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 48% 52%

36. Fluency on Inconsistent Trials World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 52%

37. Less Bias World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding 61.9%

38. Practice Effects Example World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

39. Summary Inclusion == Useable Trials AlternativeKeyboard % Correct Keyboard World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Study 1Study 2

40. Summary Latency AlternativeKeyboard Fluency Keyboard Less Bias KeyboardSwitches World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Study 1Study 2

41. Limitations PracticeSample World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

42. Future Directions and Conclusions Between subjects designLarger sample sizesDevice World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding

43. UM Center for Contextual Psychology dedicated to World Domination through Peace, Love, and Understanding Using Assistive Technology in Behavioral Research: A Comparison of IRAP Input Methods Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson Lauren Fassero Joi Tucker Karen Kate Kellum Maureen K. Flynn Kelly G. Wilson