Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 1.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 1

2 What is the purpose of RTI? Response to Intervention is a framework for supporting students who are potentially at risk and assisting them before they fall behind. RtI is grounded in high quality core classroom instruction for all students which is then supplemented as necessary by progressively more intensive interventions for students who may struggle with reading or mathematics.

3 Key Components Periodic universal screening to determine which students may need additional instruction. DIBELS & DAZE benchmarks, Ed Pro, CSAP, CBQMs, unit exams Ongoing progress monitoring to determine the effectiveness of additional instruction. DIBELS & DAZE progress monitoring, exit tickets, classroom performance

4

5 RTI at Fort Logan What does our data say?

6 Colorado Growth Model: CSAP Results

7 Colorado Growth Model: CSAP Growth

8 Colorado Growth Model: Fort Logan Growth vs. AYP

9 Data Discussion Partner Talk –What accounts for the variations in results over the past four years? –What role had / can RTI play in these results? –What explains Fort Logan’s success in math during the 2010 - 2011 school year?

10 Ed Performance Reading Growth

11 Ed Performance Incoming Reading Data

12 Data Discussion 1.) Look at your classroom reading data. Write down trends that you notice. (10 minutes) 2.) Share and discuss with your grade level teams. (15 minutes)

13 Ed Performance Math Growth

14 Ed Performance Incoming Math Data

15 Data Discussion 1.) Look at your classroom math data. Write down trends that you notice. (10 minutes) 2.) Share and discuss with your grade level teams. (15 minutes)

16 Wrap Up Trends? Observations? Themes?

17 RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 2

18 Enough already…. What’s the plan?

19 Step 1: Define the problem.

20 A problem is the difference between what is observed/measured and an expectation for a student. Example: Randy is reading at 45 words per minute, while the grade level norm is 70 wpm. Example: Samantha is able to successfully add and subtract one digit numbers only 50% of the time. The class expectation is that students will add and subtract one-digit numbers correctly 95% of the time with demonstrated automaticity.

21 Step 2 Collect Data

22 Body of Evidence The classroom teacher then collects a body of evidence to illustrate the problem. Examples: Unit tests, running records, DIBELS, DAZE, EdPro, classwork, anecdotal notes, behavior referrals, etc.

23 Step 3 PLC/Data Team Meeting

24

25 PLC Time Set aside time during one of your bi-weekly PLC meetings to discuss the problem you have defined. Bring your body of evidence. Set an ambitious yet feasible goal for the student. Brainstorm and record possible Tier 1 interventions for the student. Implement these interventions with fidelity. Schedule a follow-up meeting in 2 weeks to discuss student progress.

26 Sources for Information on Interventions www.interventioncentral.org Great ideas for academic and behavioral interventions http://intro2rti.wikispaces.com Lots of different RTI resources brought together http://rtinetwork.org Differentiation ideas and RTI models

27

28 Step 4 Determine Progress

29

30 Step 5 Problem Solving Team

31 Schedule a meeting with the PST. Bring body of evidence, including documentation of all Tier 1 interventions. PST brainstorms possible new Tier 1 or Tier 2 interventions. PST sets goals for the student. Implement agreed upon interventions. Schedule a follow-up meeting in one month to assess progress.

32 Who should be there? -Classroom teacher -Interventionists -RTI coordinator -Building leadership -PST team members -Parents

33 Step 6 Determine Progress

34

35

36 RTI and Special Education “RTI models are worth the effort required for implementation, as they advance identification of and intervention for learning disabilities by linking these two domains” (Fletcher, 2004)

37

38 Pushing our High Students How are we pushing our gifted and advanced students higher?

39 Sheridan School District Gifted and Talented Data Gifted and Talented programming is the only area in which we are consistently exceeding AYP expectations.

40 Data Discussion What accounts for our success in advanced student programming? How can we carry that success into other areas of instruction?

41 What has already been done? COGAT screening for all current 3rd and 4th graders in 2010-2011 school year. Results emailed to 3rd and 4th grade classroom teachers over the summer. Analysis of CSAP, Ed Performance, and DORF and DAZE scores.

42 Future Identification Continue COGAT testing for incoming 3rd graders. Test 4th and 5th grade students on an as-needed basis, resulting from teacher observation. Train staff in Gifted and Talented observation and identification tracking. Continue to monitor students achievements as measured by CSAP, Ed Performance, DORF, and DAZE.

43 Meeting the needs of GT and advanced students at Fort Logan

44 Math –Hire teacher for advanced 5th grade math class. –Advanced 3rd and 4th graders attend next grade level math class. –Use compilation of Ed Performance data, CSAP scores, COGAT scores, end of the year summative assessment (3rd and 4th grade students only), and teacher observation to determine placement.

45 Reading –Consider creating an advanced language arts flex group at each grade level. –Consider creating independent studies within core reading classes using web resources.

46 Gifted and Talented Resources www.cec.sped.org Offers a variety of documents and suggestions on gifted and talented programming. http://www.nsgt.org/ A nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of gifted and talented students. Great resources on classroom differentiation and more.

47 RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 3

48 What is your role in RTI?

49 Building Leadership Barb and Sheri Attend problem-solving team meetings at-least monthly Create a schedule that allows staff members to implement needed Tier 1, Tier 2, & Tier 3 interventions Monitor integrity of interventions Monitor integrity of data

50 RTI Coordinators Jason & Julie Support buildings in developing problem-solving team Monitor and organize problem-solving process, including scheduling meetings Attend district coordinator meetings Collect documentation forms Monitor interventions

51 RTI Team Support the building in developing building-wide documentation and processes for RTI. Compile lists of appropriate Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 interventions Assist colleagues in carrying out the RTI process

52 Problem Solving Team Assign roles (Meeting Facilitator, recorder, time keeper) Define problem Determine if further assessment is needed Analyze data and set student achievement goals Suggest, agree upon, and document interventions Develop a plan for implementing data

53 Interventionists Provide interventions with fidelity Communicate with classroom teacher and case manager on a frequent basis about intervention effectiveness Support classroom teachers in developing interventions for at-risk students

54 Special Educators Case managers for those students with IEPs Provide interventions for IEP students with fidelity Communicate with classroom teacher on a frequent basis about intervention effectiveness

55 Classroom Teachers Identify students not making sufficient progress or not meeting their potential Communicate with parents regarding student progress, identified concern and meeting date Complete documentation for problem-solving team Collect and discuss data at Tier I with grade- level or content-level teams Attend problem-solving team meeting Support and participate in the intervention plan

56 Families Collaborate with teachers regarding identified need Share information about child and family as appropriate Support student learning at home Attend problem-solving team meeting and partner in intervention planning and progress monitoring

57 Together we can do it!

58 Sources Colorado Department of Education. (n.d.). Learn about rti. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/rti/LearnAboutRtI.htm http://www.cde.state.co.us/rti/LearnAboutRtI.htm Colorado Department of Education. (Producer). (2008). Introducing colorado's growth model - tutorial #1: overview. [Web Video]. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/cdeedserv/growthmodel/GrowthModelIntr oPt01.html http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/cdeedserv/growthmodel/GrowthModelIntr oPt01.html Colorado Department of Education. (Producer). (n.d.). Response to intervention - meeting the needs of all students. [Video]. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/rti/rtivideo/rti.htm http://www.cde.state.co.us/media/rti/rtivideo/rti.htm Colorado Department of Education. (2011). The colorado growth model. Retrieved from http://www.schoolview.org/ColoradoGrowthModel.asphttp://www.schoolview.org/ColoradoGrowthModel.asp Colorado Department of Education, (2008). Response to intervention (rti). Denver, CO: Government printing office. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/rti/LearnAboutRtI.htm http://www.cde.state.co.us/rti/LearnAboutRtI.htm

59 Sources (cont.) Doing What Works. (Photographer). (n.d.). Visual diagram: using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. [Print Graphic]. Retrieved from http://dww.ed.gov/Data-Driven-Instructional-Decision- Making/topic/?T_ID=30http://dww.ed.gov/Data-Driven-Instructional-Decision- Making/topic/?T_ID=30 Fletcher, J. (2004). Identifying learning disabilities in the context of response to intervention: a hybrid model. Retrieved from http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/identifyingld http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/ld/identifyingld Mulrine, C. F. (2011, September 24). How to create online learning environments for gifted and talented learners. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CAT=none&T EMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=10669 http://www.cec.sped.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CAT=none&T EMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=10669 Talent act: to aid gifted and high-ability learners by empowering the nation's teachers act s.857 and h.r. 1674. (2001, May). Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/ScriptContent/Custom/miniSearch/searchResults.cf m?q=TALENT+Act http://www.cec.sped.org/ScriptContent/Custom/miniSearch/searchResults.cf m?q=TALENT+Act Scantron performance series. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.edperformance.com/ http://www.edperformance.com/


Download ppt "RTI at Fort Logan Elementary By name. By need. Day 1."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google