Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Economic Integration and Mexico’s Manufacturing Performance: Is Chinese Competition to Blame? Ernesto López-Córdova, Inter-American Development Bank 2004.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Economic Integration and Mexico’s Manufacturing Performance: Is Chinese Competition to Blame? Ernesto López-Córdova, Inter-American Development Bank 2004."— Presentation transcript:

1 Economic Integration and Mexico’s Manufacturing Performance: Is Chinese Competition to Blame? Ernesto López-Córdova, Inter-American Development Bank 2004 LAEBA Annual Conference Beijing, China, 3-4 December 2004 The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the IDB or its member countries.

2 Questions How has trade policy after NAFTA affected Mexico’s manufacturing sector? What additional factors affect the behavior of the sector? How do China and Mexico compare?

3 Overview Mexico’s trade policy since the 1990s: Distorting, favoring low-wage industries Protection of low-wage jobs in less productive companies Trade liberalization favors productivity Instead of protectionism, consider policies that promote productivity growth and competitiveness

4 Trade Policy in the 1990s Reduction of average tariffs However, tariff increases in... Labor intensive industries Trade with low-wage countries

5

6

7 Trade Policy in the 1990s NAFTA Preferential access to the US market Specially in low-wage industries More recently, erosion of NAFTA preferences

8

9

10

11 Implications Jobs and output growth in low- wage industries NAFTA favors export in those industries Specialization in industries without comparative advantage vis-a-vis China

12

13

14 Competition in US market MX competes more directly with CHN than the rest of Latin America Comparable with Asian countries Increased during the last 30 years Concentration in manufacturing In which industries do MX and CHN compete? “Gain”- MX gains market share in US, CHN loses “Loss” – MX loses market share in US, CHN gains “Compete” – Both gain share in US market

15 Gains, 1995-2000

16 Losses, 1995-2000

17 Increased competition, 1995-2000

18

19

20

21 Trade Policy in the1990s Evidence of: Expansion of low-wages industries Greater exports and FDI in such industries Also, export growth in high-wages / high-tech industries But China’s exports grew faster Higher competition with China in such industries

22 Plant-level impact Look at panel of approximately 6000 plants over the 1993-2000 period What would happen to plant-level employment if import competition fell? Protection benefits mainly least productive firms in low-wages industries More productive firms in better position to compete with imports

23 Employment and imports among Mexican plants, 1993-2000

24 Trade and Productivity Productivity not only allows plants to face foreign competition successfully In addition, trade liberalization and FDI favor productivity growth Both at the plant level And in the sector as a whole

25 Mexico: TFP growth 1993-2000 ( By industry or plant characteristic)

26 Is Chinese competition to blame? In spite of its undeniable accomplishments, trade policy in the 1990s also created distortions in favor of low-wage industries and protected inefficient producers China has become a manufacturing powerhouse in international markets and competes directly with Mexico. Why? Fast productivity growth

27 What can Mexico do? Protectionism is not a long-term answer to Chinese competition Important to review what factors inhibit competitiveness and productivity in Mexico Business climate Production costs Research and development

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35


Download ppt "Economic Integration and Mexico’s Manufacturing Performance: Is Chinese Competition to Blame? Ernesto López-Córdova, Inter-American Development Bank 2004."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google