Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The successful development of an ergonomics standard

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The successful development of an ergonomics standard"— Presentation transcript:

1 The successful development of an ergonomics standard

2 Criteria of success Address the risk Match current knowledge
Provide problem-solving framework Provide equal protection Support of affected communities

3 “Ergonomics” claims - the impact
On average, each year 1/3 of all claims 26,200 claims 1,107,000 days lost $136,367,000 in claims costs

4 Review models Administrative Community
In BC, community model used with 200 employer and worker representatives 125 health and safety professionals 30 consultative committees

5 The review process Governing body Public hearings
Senior advisory committee Ergonomics subcommittee

6 “Draining the WCB’s poisonous wounds”
Business in Vancouver June 21-27 “Just when you thought WCB costs were high, here come ergonomic regulations” The Vancouver Sun Sept 15 “Keyboard not necessarily the culprit in computer-related pain” The Vancouver Province Sept 18 “A formula for confusion” Nelson News, November 10 “Businesses condemn ergonomics” The Vancouver Sun Sept 27 “Ergonomic talks spur “big lies”, “tantrums” Daily News Sept 22 “Workers, employers at odds over WCB” Daily News Sept 21 “WCB workplace plans draw praise, criticism” The Vancouver Sun, Dec 20 “Draining the WCB’s poisonous wounds”

7 Issues raised at hearings
1/3 of claims are musculoskeletal There are no regulations to protect workers MSIs cause extensive human suffering Delink code from regulation Epidemic of claims may result Organization of work is a management matter Regulation will impact economy Workplace factors of little significance There is no proof regulation will reduce injuries Only existing general duty requirements are needed

8 Ergonomics (MSI) requirements
Risk identification Risk assessment Evaluation Consultation Education and training Risk control

9 Title: Ergonomics (MSI) requirements
Issues professional ergonomist perspective limit of application worker/employer perspective

10 Scope All workplaces MSIs, not adverse health effects
Emphasis on sprains, strains and inflammations

11 Risk/job factors Used for both risk identification and assessment
18 factors in 5 groups Groups physical demands layout and condition of the workstation characteristics of objects handled environmental conditions organization of work

12 Specific factors a) Physical demands b) Workstation force repetition
duration work postures local contact stresses b) Workstation working reaches working heights seating floor surfaces

13 d) Environmental conditions
c) Objects handled size shape load condition weight distribution handles d) Environmental conditions e.g. cold temperature e) Organization of work work-recovery cycles task variability work rate

14 Risk control Eliminate or minimize risk
Engineering and administrative controls Interim and permanent controls

15 Education and training
Educate workers at risk of MSI early signs and symptoms potential health effects Train workers in measures to control risk

16 Evaluation Monitor effectiveness Annual evaluation
Correct deficiencies

17 Consultation With committee or representative on
risk identification, assessment and control content and delivery of education and training evaluation of compliance measures During a risk assessment, consult with workers with signs or symptoms of MSI representative sample of workers doing the work

18 Support materials Role of code of practice?
Prepare smaller documents on specific topics – Applicability of risk factors – Understanding risks – Industry-specific codes – Policies and guidelines

19 Impact of the new requirements
High profile Industry and labour initiatives Revised compensation adjudication procedures Regulatory activity - inspections and consultation Impact on claims

20 Relative frequencies of orders
Risk identification Risk assessment Risk control Education and training Evaluation and consultation

21 % of all claims due to overexertion and RMI

22 In conclusion The risk to worker health is massive
Ergonomics is sufficiently advanced to justify a standard A standard is essential to a control strategy A standard can be achieved

23 Thank you www.worksafebc.com
For further information on the standard and support materials, contact the WCB website at


Download ppt "The successful development of an ergonomics standard"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google