Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySydney Bond Modified over 9 years ago
1
The UK’s European university Portfolio Review Director of PSI
2
Portfolio Review Successful programmes support the financial health and reputation of the university Unsuccessful programmes consume valuable resources which could be deployed more effectively to achieve our strategy Page 2
3
Portfolio review: What is needed Robust approach to monitoring programme performance integrated with planning Transparent indictors of success Dual stage process for course development starting with the business case and then QA Appropriate multifunctional support to ensure the best ideas are selected for development Defined decision making authority Page 3
4
Innovation in the market assurance of new programmes (i-MAP Study LFHE) Sector spends £200M on programme development/year Sector minimum targets UG 15 – 30 students, PGT 10-15 students Institutions judged that 75% of programmes were successful 10% of new single subject degree programmes recruit ≥10 students 19% of PGT programmes recruit >10 students Initial poor recruitment does not improve Page 4
5
The Evidence Base Success indicators aligned to strategy Market data Market testing Programme costing Page 5
6
Indicators and Market Data Business intelligence pilot using Qlikview Page 6 GBP £ License 1 x Small Business Server 5,050 License 12 x Qlikview developers/users 9,720 Maintenance Annual Maintenance 23% 3,397 Service 2 day training course 3,000 Service 3 days implementation assistance 3,600 VAT 20% 3,633 Total 28,401
7
Data HESA data (5 years) KIS UCAS NSS DHLE SDS student data Page 7
8
Page 8
9
Page 9
10
Page 10
11
Indicators UGFT Page 11
12
Page 12
13
Page 13
14
All schools – Market share Page 14
15
Social Sciences: JACS 1 Page 15 Sector Kent
16
JACs 3 English: Sector v Kent new entrant UGFT Page 16 Sector Kent Top 5 HEI UK recruiters
17
JACs1 English: Institution comparison Page 17 Leeds Kent
18
Comparison of programmes Page 18 Short Name Programme Title Leeds BA Arts and Humanities with Foundation Year BA Classical Literature and English BA English and French BA English and History BA English and Philosophy BA English and Russian Civilisation BA English and Theology and Religious Studies BA English Language and Literature BA English Literature BA English Literature and Theatre Studies Short Name Programme Title Kent Drama and English & American Literature English & American Literature English & American Literature and Creative Writing with a Year Abroad English & American Literature and English Language and Linguistics English & American Literature and History English & American Literature with an Approved Year Abroad English and American Literature and Creative Writing English Language and Linguistics English, American & Post-Colonial Literatures English, American and Postcolonial Literatures with approved year abroad International Foundation Programme - Humanities
19
Exploring new subject areas Footer text Page 19 Human and social geography Physical geography and env. sci.
20
Where do Kent UGFT students come from? Page 20
21
Next steps Make dashboard available User testing Release evidence to schools / marketing Include initial review within planning cycle Develop process to assess the business case for new programmes Page 21
22
Other uses for BI All planning data Sustainability dashboards Equality, diversity and inclusivity monitoring DHLE information for Careers Student survey data including NSS League table monitoring Live student number reporting from SITS (2016) Page 22
23
Roll out of business intelligence Page 23
24
Interactive access to data via dashboard https://reg-bi.ac.kent/qlikview/ Page 24
25
THE UK’S EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY www.kent.ac.uk
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.