1. Faculty Scholar Project 2015: Academic Integrity Project team: Vivienne Brand, Eric Bouvet, Maggie Ivanova, Pam Bartholomaeus, David Curtis, Tania Leiman, Maria Giannacopoulos

2.  Within Faculty: the Faculty Scholar Project  Within Flinders: an idea whose time has come  Wide focus of Flinders definition of AI (picks up so much more than plagiarism, not always the case elsewhere) Background to project

3.  Key aims of the project:  to explore the possibilities and challenges associated with improving responses to academic integrity issues,  To understand better what existing approaches are used within the Faculty and how AI concerns vary across the Faculty (and across Schools within the Faculty) So what was the aim?

4.  Education:  Pam Bartholomaeus, David Curtis  Humanities:  Maggie Ivanova (Creative Studies), Eric Bouvet (Languages)  Law School:  Tania Leiman (Law), Maria Giannacopolous (Criminology), Vivienne Brand (Faculty Scholar) Project Team

5.  Academic Integrity website for students, staff, and anyone else:  Links to new University pages with educational support materials  good practice toolkit  Policy flow chart  The description of academic integrity for the website: please annotate, amend, comment Faculty Academic Integrity website

6.  Differences and similarities  Differences – ranges of distinctions between Schools, including in relation to reporting rates Comparison of AI approaches across the Faculty

7. Enrolments 2006-2015

8. Reports 2006 - 2015

9.  1. Resourcing matters  2. Integration with the curriculum is a good thing  3. Essay mills/commissioned answers are a real threat Academic integrity and similarities between the 3 Schools

10.  Eric Bouvet and the results of a survey of staff on Academic Integrity matters Next: