Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySpencer Hicks Modified over 9 years ago
1
Measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle D. Gabbert (University of Illinois and RBRC) M. Grosse Perdekamp (University of Illinois and RBRC) K. Hasuko (RIKEN/RBRC) S. Lange (Frankfurt University) A. Ogawa (BNL/RBRC) R. Seidl (University of Illinois and RBRC) V. Siegle (RBRC) for the Belle Collaboration HERMES Transversity Working Week November 09, 東京工業大学、大岡山 (see hep-ex/0507063 for details)
2
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle2 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 SIDIS experiments (HERMES and COMPASS) measure q(x) together with either Collins Fragmentation function or Interference Fragmentation function Motivation: Global Transversity Analysis RHIC measures the same combinations of quark Distribution (DF) and Fragmentation Functions (FF) plus unpolarized DF q(x) There are always 2 unknown functions involved which cannot be measured independently The Spin dependent Fragmentation function analysis yields information on the Collins and the Interference Fragmentation function ! Universality appears to be proven in LO by Collins and Metz: [PRL93:( 2004)252001 ]
3
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle3 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 KEKB: L>1.5x10 34 cm -2 s -1 !! KEKB –Asymmetric collider –8GeV e - + 3.5GeV e + – s = 10.58GeV ( (4S)) e + e - S –Off-resonance: 10.52 GeV e + e - q q (u,d,s,c) –Integrated Luminosity: ~ 460 fb -1 ~ 45fb -1 => off-resonance Belle detector KEKB Average Trigger rates: (4S) BB11.5Hz q q28 Hz 16 Hz Bhabha 4.4 Hz 2 35 Hz
4
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle4 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005
5
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle5 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Good tracking and particle identification!
6
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle6 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 e-e- e+e+ Jet axis: Thrust = 6.4 Near-side Hemisphere: h i, i=1,N n with z i Far-side: h j, j=1,N f with z j Event Structure at Belle e + e - CMS frame: Spin averaged cross section:
7
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle7 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Collins fragmentation: Angles and Cross section cos( ) method 2-hadron inclusive transverse momentum dependent cross section: Net (anti-)alignment of transverse quark spins e + e - CMS frame: e-e- e+e+
8
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle8 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Collins fragmentation: Angles and Cross section cos(2 ) method 2-hadron inclusive transverse momentum dependent cross section: Net (anti-)alignment of transverse quark spins Independent of thrust-axis Convolution integral I over transverse momenta involved e + e - CMS frame: e-e- e+e+ [Boer,Jakob,Mulders: NPB504(1997)345]
9
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle9 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Typical hadronic events at Belle
10
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle10 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Applied cuts, binning Off-resonance data (in the future also on- resonance) Track selection: –pT > 0.1GeV –vertex cut: dr<2cm, |dz|<4cm Acceptance cut –-0.6 < cos i < 0.9 Event selection: –Ntrack 3 –Thrust > 0.8 –Z 1, Z 2 >0.2 Light quark selection Hemisphere cut Opening angle cuts: - cos(2 ) method: h1-h2 - cos( ) method: h1-thrust h2-thrust z2z2 0123 4 5 6 78 9 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.20.30.50.71.0 5 86 1 2 3 z1z1 = Diagonal bins
11
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle11 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Examples of fitting the azimuthal asymmetries D 1 : spin averaged fragmentation function, H 1 : Collins fragmentation function N( )/N 0 No change in cosine moments when including sine and higher harmonics (even though double ratios will contain them) Cosine modulations clearly visible
12
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle12 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Raw asymmetries vs Q T Q T describes transverse momentum of virtual photon in CMS system Significant nonzero Asymmetries visible in MC (w/o Collins) Acceptance, radiative and momentum correlation effects similar for like and unlike sign pairs uds MC ( ) Unlike sign pairs uds MC ( ) Like sign pairs
13
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle13 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Methods to eliminate gluon contributions: Double ratios and subtractions Double ratio method: Subtraction method: Pros: Acceptance cancels out Cons: Works only if effects are small (both gluon radiation and signal) Pros: Gluon radiation cancels out exactly Cons: Acceptance effects remain 2 method gives very small difference in the result
14
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle14 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Testing the double ratios with MC Asymmetries do cancel out for MC Double ratios of compatible to zero Mixed events also show zero result Asymmetry reconstruction works well for MC (weak decays) Single hemisphere analysis yields zero Double ratios are safe to use uds MC ( pairs ) charm MC pairs Data ( )
15
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle15 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Small double ratios in low thrust data sample Low thrust contains radiative effects Collins effect vanishes Strong experimental indication that double ratio method works Nonzero asymmetries at high Q T also seen in MC, due to acceptance and background effect Preliminary
16
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle16 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Results for -pairs for 30fb -1 Significant non-zero asymmetries Rising behavior vs. z cos double ratios only marginally larger First direct measurement of the Collins function z1z1 z2z2 Systematic error Possible charm contribution
17
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle17 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Preliminary Systematic errors Double ratio method Higher moments Charge sign ratio MC double ratio Other errors: smearing, pid, charm content
18
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle18 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Take unpolarized parameterizations (Kretzer at Q 2 =2.5GeV 2 ) Assume (PDF-like behavior) Assume Sensitivity studies in progress An experimentalist’s interpretation: fitting parameterizations of the Collins function(s)
19
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle19 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Take simple parameterization to test sensitivity on favored to disfavored Ratio Favored/Disfavored contribution Sensitivity c b
20
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle20 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Summary and outlook Double ratios: double ratios from data most systematic errors cancel Analysis procedure passes all zero tests Main systematic uncertainties understood Significant nonzero asymmetry with double ratios is observed Naive LO analysis shows significant Collins effect Data can be used for more sophisticated analysis Finalize paper (based on hep- ex/0507063) On resonance 10 x statistics Include into analysis: Better distinction between favored and disfavored Collins function Include Vector Mesons into analysis: Possibility to test string fragmentation models used to describe Collins effect Expansion of analysis to Interference fragmentation function straightforward Summary: Outlook:
21
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle21 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005
22
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle22 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Outline Motivation –Study transverse spin effects in fragmentation –Global transversity analysis –Feasibility LEP analysis [hep-ph/9901216] The BELLE detector Collins analysis –Angular definitions and cross sections –Double Ratios to eliminate radiative/momentum correlation effects –An experimentalist’s interpretation Summary
23
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle23 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Collins Effect in Quark Fragmentation J.C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396, 161(1993) q Collins Effect: Fragmentation of a transversely polarized quark q into spin-less hadron h carries an azimuthal dependence:
24
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle24 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Good detector performance (acceptance, momentum resolution, pid) Jet production from light quarks off-resonance (60 MeV below resonance) (~10% of all data) Intermediate Energy Sufficiently high scale (Q 2 ~ 110 GeV 2 ) - can apply pQCD Not too high energy (Q 2 << M Z 2 ) -avoids additional complication from Z interference Sensitivity = A 2 sqrt(N) ~ x19 (60) compared to LEP A Belle / A LEP ~ x2 (A scales as ln Q 2 ) L Belle / L LEP ~ x23 (230) Belle is well suited for FF measurements:
25
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle25 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 What is the transverse momentum Q T of the virtual photon? In the lepton CMS frame e - =-e + and the virtual photon is only time-like: q =(e - +p + )=(Q,0,0,0) Radiative (=significant BG) effects are theoretically best described in the hadron CMS frame where P h1 +P h2 =0 q ’ =(q ’ 0,q ’ ) Inclusive Cross section for radiative events (acc. to D.Boer): P h1 e+e+ e-e- P h2 e-’e-’ e+’e+’ q’ P’ h1 P’ h2 qTqT Lepton-CMS Hadron-CMS
26
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle26 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Experimental issues Cos2 moments have two contributions: –Collins Can be isolated either by subtraction or double ratio method –Radiative effects Cancels exactly in subtraction method, and in LO of double ratios Beam Polarization zero? Cos(2 Lab ) asymmetries for jets or False asymmetries from weak decays Study effect in decays, constrain through D tagging False asymmetries from misidentified hemispheres Q T or polar angle cut False asymmetries from acceptance Cancels in double ratios, can be estimated in charge ratios, fiducial cuts Decaying particles lower z cut
27
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle27 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Preliminary Systematic errors Double Ratio vs Subtraction Method: R – S < 0.002 The difference was assigned as a systematic error.
28
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle28 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Systematics: charm contribution? Weak (parity violating) decays could also create asymmetries (seen in overall dilution 5%) Especially low dilution in combined z-bins with large pion asymmetry Double ratios from charm MC compatible to zero Charm decays cannot explain large double ratios seen in the data Charm enhanced D * Data sample used to calculate and correct the charm contribution to the double ratios (see hep-ex/0507063 for details) Charm fraction N(charm)/N(all)
29
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle29 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Different charge combinations additional information Unlike sign pairs contain either only favored or only unfavored fragmentation functions on quark and antiquark side: Like sign pairs contain one favored and one unfavored fragmentation function each: Favored= u ,d ,cc. Unfavored= d ,u ,cc.
30
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle30 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Example: Left-Right Asymmetry in Pion Rates sqsq π q q π sqsq = 0 ! AT =AT = N L - N R N L + N R Collins Effect N L : pions to the left N R : pions to the right
31
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle31 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 The Collins Effect in the Artru Fragmentation Model π + picks up L=1 to compensate for the pair S=1 and is emitted to the right. String breaks and a dd-pair with spin -1 is inserted. A simple model to illustrate that spin-orbital angular momentum coupling can lead to left right asymmetries in spin-dependent fragmentation:
32
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle32 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 General Fragmentation Functions Number density for finding a spin-less hadron h from a transversely polarized quark, q: unpolarized FF Collins FF
33
measurements of chiral-odd fragmentation functions at Belle33 Transversity Week Nov 09, 2005 Raw asymmetries vs transverse photon momentum Q T Already MC contains large asymmetries Strong dependence against transverse photon Momentum Q T Expected to be due to radiative effects Difference of DATA and MC is signal not so easy to determine DATA ( ) fiducial cut DATA (KK) fiducial cut UDS-MC fiducial cut CHARM-MC fiducial cut Unlike sign pairs Like sign pairs
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.