Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDwight Lewis Modified over 9 years ago
1
30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE
2
30/Jul/20102 Contents Ken-ichiro KOIKE What is Z boson Event Selection ~ Z candidates Isolation Cut study Z→μμ Cross Section study To Do
3
30/Jul/20103 Z boson Q Z = 0, spin 1, M Z = 91.1876±0.023 GeV mediate weak force Discovery Gargamelle bubble chamber observed Weak Neutral Current in 1973 In May 1983, Z bozon was discovered with UA1 and UA2 experiment at Super Proton Synchrotron(SPS) Decay mode neutrino(ν e, ν μ, ν τ ) up-type quark(u, c) down-type quark(d, s, b) lepton(e, μ, τ) BR = ( 20.00 ± 0.06 ) % BR = ( 15.6 ± 0.6 ) % BR = ( 11.6 ± 0.4 ) % BR = ( 3.3658 ± 0.0023 ) % Ken-ichiro KOIKE
4
30/Jul/20104 Z Event Selection FitCollision EventHigh Pt Event Z->μμ Event Best Match|Zvtx| < 150 mmCombinedOpposite Charge Match χ square < 100Pt > 15 GeVPt > 15, 20 GeV Fit χ square < 100|η| < 2.5|η| < 2.5, 2.4 ΣPt/Pt < 0.2 80 < Mμμ < 100 GeV Jet Background Electroweak Background Cosmic Background Z → ττ → muons W → μν w/ second high Pt muon in a jet t-tbar decay → di muon → μ + jet di boson production small fraction ! negligible! heavy-flavor quark → b/c hadrons → muons Ken-ichiro KOIKE
5
5 di-muon Invariant Mass Mass Window : 80 < M < 100 → 71 candidates of Z boson ∫Ldt = 290 nb -1 Constant 20.58±3.38 Mean 90.79±0.36 Sigma 3.12±0.38 status (Monte Carlo) Monte Carlo histogram is scaled to Real Data by Integrated Luminosity 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
6
6 Kinematics(Pt,η,φ) of Z candidates Leading Pt Second Pt Phi Eta 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
7
7 Isolation cut FitCollision EventHigh Pt Event Z->μμ Event Best Match|Zvtx| < 150 mmCombinedOpposite Charge Match χ square < 100Pt > 15 GeVPt > 15, 20 GeV Fit χ square < 100|η| < 2.5|η| < 2.5, 2.4 ΣPt/Pt < 0.2 80 < Mμμ < 100 GeV μ Mass Window : 80 < M < 100 → 74 candidates 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE ~ Tag and Probe method ~ Real Data and MC show agreement within the statistical uncertainty. ∫Ldt = 290 nb -1
8
8 Z→μμ Cross Section formula for calculation of cross section # of Z candidate acceptance efficiency (reconstruction, trigger) integrated luminosity the cross section is predicted to be 989 pb (√s=7 TeV) by Pythia Monte Carlo uncertainty is about 3% 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
9
9 Z→μμ Cross Section 71 candidates 290 nb -1 reconstruction efficiency ・・・ relative efficiency technique (ID and MS) Scale Factor : 0.989±0.010(stat.)±0.038(sys.) trigger efficiency ・・・ L1_MU0 trigger Scale Factor : 0.970±0.012(stat.)±0.037(sys.) acceptance : 45.32±0.02(stat.)% 572.33±0.0156(stat.)±0.053(sys.) pb -1 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE less than prediction of MC 989nb -1 …
10
10 Summary & To Do 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE Summary I researched the Z boson generation. 71 candidates of Z→μμ were discovered with my event selection. Study of Isolation Cut showed agreement between real data and MC. Z cross section from real data was less than prediction from MC. To Do More research with much amount of statistics Study other physics quantities Check the cause of disagreement of Z→μμ cross section More and more study for myself Thank you so much.
11
11 Back Up 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
12
12 Muon Detector 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE MDT RPC TGC ・・・ Barrel : |η|<1.0 End Cap : 1.0<|η|<2.4 ・・・ Barrel : |η|<1.05 ・・・ End Cap : 1.0<|η|<2.7
13
13 Inner Detector 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE Pixel SCT TRT ・・・ B layer : |η|<2.5 Barrel : |η|<1.7 End Cap : 1.7<|η|<2.5 ・・・ Barrel : |η|<1.4 End Cap : 1.4<|η| <2.5 ・・・ Barrel : |η|<0.7 End Cap : 0.7<|η|<2.5
14
14 Isolation cut 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
15
15 Invariant Mass ~ Isolation cut comparison ~ 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE ∫Ldt = 290 nb -1
16
16 Invariant Mass ~ Isolation cut comparison ~ 30/Jul/2010 Ken-ichiro KOIKE
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.