Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMeredith James Modified over 9 years ago
1
De Jonge v. Oregon John Salinkas
2
Case facts Case heard: December 9th,1936 Defendant: Dirk De Jonge Decided by Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes Respondent: Oregon
3
What Happened On July 27 of 1934, in Portland Oregon, the police raided a meeting held by the communist party. Dirk De Jonge was arrested and charged with the violation of the Criminal Syndicalism Law of Oregon.
4
Critical Question Were the charges pressed against Dirk De Jonge in violation of the Due Process Clause? Was this a violation of the First Amendment?
5
Ruling Conviction violated both First and 14 th Amendment. Evidence showed he took no active part in teaching of Criminal Syndicalism. The Conviction was reversed
6
Work cited www.Oyez.org www.Oyez.org www.Findlaw.com www.Findlaw.com www.Firstamendmentcenter.org www.Firstamendmentcenter.org
7
United States v. Stevens Argued October 6 th, 2009 Robert Stevens knowingly sold videos of illegal dog fights convicted under the Pennsylvania Federal District Court – Violation of 18 U.S.C section 48 Claimed it was a violation of his freedom of speech. Court agreed it was unconstitutional.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.