1. What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett

2. PORTFOLIOS Portfolio assessment is a multi-faceted process characterized by the following recurrent qualities: It is continuous and ongoing, providing both formative (i.e., ongoing) and summative (i.e., culminating) opportunities for monitoring students' progress toward achieving essential outcomes. It is multidimensional, i.e., reflecting a wide variety of artifacts and processes reflecting various aspects of students' learning process(es). It provides for collaborative reflection, including ways for students to reflect about their own thinking processes and metacognitive introspection as they monitor their own comprehension, reflect upon their approaches to problem-solving and decision-making, and observe their emerging understanding of subjects and skills.

3. They clearly reflect stated learner outcomes identified in the core or essential curriculum that students are expected to study. They focus upon students' performance-based learning experiences as well as their acquisition of key knowledge, skills, and attitudes. They contain samples of work that stretch over an entire marking period, rather than single points in time. They contain works that represent a variety of different assessment tools. They contain a variety of work samples and evaluations of that work by the student, peers, and teachers, possible even parents' reactions.

4. What Are Some Different Types of Portfolios? There are many different types of portfolios, each of which can serve one or more specific purposes as part of an overall school or classroom assessment program. The following is a list of the types most often cited in the literature: Documentation Portfolio: This type is also know as the "working" portfolio. Specifically, this approach involves a collection of work over time showing growth and improvement reflecting students' learning of identified outcomes. The documentation portfolio can include everything from brainstorming activities to drafts to finished products. The collection becomes meaningful when specific items are selected out to focus on particular educational experiences or goals. It can include the bet and weakest of student work.

5. Process Portfolio: This approach documents all facets or phases of the learning process. They are particularly useful in documenting students' overall learning process. It can show how students integrate specific knowledge or skills and progress towards both basic and advanced mastery. Additionally, the process portfolio inevitably emphasizes students' reflection upon their learning process, including the use of reflective journals, think logs, and related forms of metacognitive processing.

6. Showcase Portfolio: This type of portfolio is best used for summative evaluation of students' mastery of key curriculum outcomes. It should include students' very best work, determined through a combination of student and teacher selection. Only completed work should be included. In addition, this type of portfolio is especially compatible with audio-visual artifact development, including photographs, videotapes, and electronic records of students' completed work. The showcase portfolio should also include written analysis and reflections by the student upon the decision-making process(es) used to determine which works are included.

7. Phase One: Planning and Organization This initial phase of portfolio development entails decision-making on the part of students and teachers. By exploring essential questions at the beginning of the process, students can fully understand the purpose of the portfolio and its status as a means of monitoring and evaluating their own progress. Key questions for the teacher and the student must include:

8. How do I select times, materials, etc. to reflect what I am learning in this class? How do I organize and present the items, materials, etc. that I have collected? How will portfolios be maintained and stored?

9. Phase Two: Collection This process involves the collection of meaningful artifacts and products reflecting students' educational experiences and goals. Decisions must be made at this phase about the context and contents of the portfolio based upon the intent and purposes identified for it. The selection and collection of artifacts and products should be based upon a variety of factors that can include:

10. Particular subject matter; A learning process; or Special projects, themes, and/or unites. All selections included in the collection should clearly reflect the criteria and standards identified for evaluation.

11. Phase Three: Reflection Wherever possible, there should be evidence of students' metacognitive reflections upon the learning process and their monitoring of their evolving comprehension of key knowledge and skills. These reflections can take the form of learning logs, reflective journals, and other forms of reflections upon their experiences, the thinking processes they have used, and the habits of mind they employed at given points in time and across time periods. In addition, teacher and/or parent reflections upon the products, processes, and thinking articulated in the portfolio should also be included wherever appropriate.

12. How Can You Get Started Using Portfolios? Questions to Consider 1. In what areas of our current approach to assessment and evaluation of student progress are we lacking essential information or instruments? How might a portfolio assessment process complement or address our current approach?

13. 2. What are the major behaviors, outcomes, or behavioral indicators that form the basis for the core curriculum during a specific period of time (e.g., a unit, quarter, semester, course, etc.)? Which of thee outcomes can be assess most effectively using a portfolio approach? 3. As students learn the essential knowledge and skills we have identified, what observable behaviors will give us evidence of their learning and their progress in achieving identified standards?

14. 4. What are the primary activities that can be designed to provide evidence of students' acquisition of essential skills and knowledge? Which of these activities might be especially appropriate for purposes of assessment and evaluation? 5. How can we grade or score both individual portfolio elements and the portfolio as a while? For example, do we have available to us rubrics, rules, scoring keys, and/or checklists that may guide and inform this process?

15. 6. How can we ensure that students understand the purpose and process involved in developing and maintaining a portfolio? 7. How can we involve parents/families in the portfolio assessment process, including providing up-front training as we begin to use this process? 8. How can we integrate oral communication skills (e.g., presentations, oral defenses, dialogues, and audio-visual demonstrations) into our portfolio assessment process?

16. How Can Portfolios Be Evaluated? According to Paulson, Paulson and Meyer, (1991, p. 63): "Portfolios offer a way of assessing student learning that is different than traditional methods. Portfolio assessment provides the teacher and students an opportunity to observe students in a broader context: taking risks, developing creative solutions, and learning to make judgments about their own performances."

17. In order for thoughtful evaluation to take place, teachers must have multiple scoring strategies to evaluate students' progress. Criteria for a finished portfolio might include several of the following: Thoughtfulness (including evidence of students' monitoring of their own comprehension, metacognitive reflection, and productive habits of mind). Growth and development in relationship to key curriculum expectancies and indicators.

18. Understanding and application of key processes. Completeness, correctness, and appropriateness of products and processes presented in the portfolio. Diversity of entries (e.g., use of multiple formats to demonstrate achievement of designated performance standards).

19. It is especially important for teachers and students to work together to prioritize those criteria that will be used as a basis for assessing and evaluating student progress, both formatively (i.e., throughout an instructional time period) and summartively (i.e., as part of a culminating project, activity, or related assessment to determine the extent to which identified curricular expectancies, indicators, and standards have been achieved).

20. As the school year progresses, students and teacher can work together to identify especially significant or important artifacts and processes to be captured in the portfolio. Additionally, they can work collaboratively to determine grades or scores to be assigned. Rubrics, rules, and scoring keys can be designed for a variety of portfolio components. In addition, letter grades might also be assigned, where appropriate. Finally, some for of oral discussion or investigation should be included as part of the summative evaluation process. This component should involve the student, teacher, and if possible, a panel of reviewers in a thoughtful exploration of the portfolio components, students' decision-making and evaluation processes related to artifact selection, and other relevant issues.