Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGeorge Stafford Modified over 9 years ago
1
Jens Jakob 1 ; Anna Simeonova 2 ; Bernd Kasper 3 ; Ulrich Ronellenfitsch 1 ; Frederik Wenz 2 ; Peter Hohenberger 1 1 Department of Surgery, 2 Department of Radiation Oncology, 3 Interdisciplinary Tumor Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany 1 Experience with combined radiation therapy and sunitinib for preoperative treatment of soft tissue sarcoma
2
no conflict of interest
3
Treatment strategy in locally advanced, non metastatic STS Standard therapy is surgery and irradiation Irradiation is most frequently applied preoperatively Systemic chemotherapy or ILP are administered in selected cases Aim of RT: improvement of margins by devitalizing tumor Up to 15% local recurrences Need to improve efficacy
4
Radiation therapy combined with anti-angiogenic treatment - rationale Addition of a tumoractive drug Transient ‘‘normalization’’ of abnormal tumor vasculature may lead to improved oxygen delivery and irradiation efficacy (Jain 2005) Experimental data demonstrate additive, possibly synergistic effects (Nieder 2006) Optimal therapy sequence unclear Radiation therapy
5
Sunitinib Oral multi receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti- angiogenic properties Approved by the FDA and EMA (e.g. advanced renal cell carcinoma, imatinib-resistant GIST) Single agent sunitinib demonstrated evidence of metabolic response in patients with non-GIST sarcoma (George 2009) Sunitinib improved the efficacy of irradiation in a STS mouse model (Yoon 2009)
6
Preoperative radiation therapy combined with sunitinib Primary end point: toxicity of combined treatment Secondary end points: postoperative morbidity, treatment response Recruitment Phase I completed, data not available yet (GISG 03, NCT 0148835) 16 patients treated off label but according to protocol Tumor resection after 5-8 weeks Radiotherapy 50,4 Gy Sunitinib p.o., max. 37.5mg Locally advanced non metastatic STS
7
Patients total number16 age (median, range)55 (18-79) years tumor site retroperitoneum lower extremity trunk/groin 10 5 1 tumor size (median, range)15.5 (6-33) cm tumor grade (FNLCC) low grade high grade 1 15 histological subtype DDLS myxoid liposarcoma NOS other 61456145
8
Toxicity of combined therapy according to CTCAE 4.0 grade 0Grade1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4 Hematologic1/161581 Skin4/169300 Gastrointestinal7/164500 Arterial hypertension12/160400 Hand-foot syndrome12/161210 Other8/164400
9
Dose adjustments week12345678 off 37.5mg sunitinib 01138999 on 37.5mg sunitinib 1615 138777 Reason for dose adjustments Hematologic toxicity Hand-foot syndrome Gastrointestinal toxicity
10
Postoperative morbidity, 14/16 patients Tumor localization Complications ≥ grade 3 Lower extremity/ trunk 2/5 seroma lymphatic fistula Retroperitoneal2/9 anastomotic leak septic bleeding 2/16 patients did not undergo surgery because of tumor progression or irresectability
11
Treatment response Response RECIST Pathologic response (% necrosis) PR100 PR100 PR>90 SD>90 SD51-90 SD51-90 SD51-90 SD<50 SD<50 SD<50 SDnot stated SDnot stated SDnot stated SDno resection PD100 PDno resection
12
Oncological Outcome median follow-up 38 (6-59) months 2/16 progressive disease (no tumor resection) 2/14 local recurrence (after tumor resection) 6/16 metastatic disease 1/16 died of disease
13
Summary Acceptable treatment toxicity of combined radiation therapy and sunitinib 50% of the patients require dose adjustments of sunitinib All patients received planned irradiation dose Protocol even feasible in retroperitoneal STS Postoperative morbidity not increased
14
Conclusion Combining irradiation and anti-angiogenic substances feasible Optimal treatment regimen still in the project phase Timing, cumulative dose and selection of anti-angiogenic drug Irradiation dose Phase II/III clearly justified
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.