Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGwenda Curtis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Detecting Fraud Using Benford’s Law
2
BENFORD’S LAW 6 3 8 1 9 9 1 6 3 4 5 1 8 4 9 3 1 7 2 1 9 6 7 1 2 3 8 5 7 1 9 2 4 3 9 7 9 1 7 1 4 4 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 8 7 9 9 1 6 3 4 3 6 8 9 9 3 1 7 2 1 9 6 5 1 2 3 8 5 2 1 4 2 4 3 9 7 9 1 7 4 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 3 3 1 9 9 2 6 2 4 5 1 8 9 9 3 1 7 2 4 9 6 3 1 2 2 8 5 7 1 9 2 4 3 9 7 9 2 7 5 6 4 3 3 3 5 5 2 5 5 6 8 8 8 8 8
3
1 Simon Newcomb Benford’s Law 6 3 8 1 9 9 1 6 3 4 5 1 8 4 9 17 2 1 9 6 7 1 2 3 8 5 7 1 9 2 4 3 3
4
Number LogFormula 101.0000LOG(10) 111.0414LOG(11) 121.0792LOG(12) 131.1139LOG(13) 141.1461LOG(14) 151.1761LOG(15) 161.2041LOG(16) 171.2304LOG(17) 181.2553LOG(18) 191.2788LOG(19) 201.3010LOG(20)
5
Logarithm Example Multiply 320 by 417 (Answer 133,440) Log(320) = 2.50515 Log(417) = 2.620136 Log (320) + Log (417) = 5.125286 10^5.5125286 = 133,440
6
Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers Theory: “A multi-digit number is more likely to begin with ‘1’ than any other number.” In other words, these are probably the most faded numbers on our calculators.
7
Newcomb’s Shortcoming He failed to provide a reason why his theory and formula worked!!!!!
8
Frank Benford
9
Noted the same phenomena as Newcomb in the same exact manner in the late 1920’s, and theorized that unless his friends had a predilection for low digit numbers, there must be a reason to explain this phenomena.
10
Benford Tests Analyzed 20,229 sets of numbers, including, areas of rivers, baseball averages, numbers in magazine articles, atomic weights of atoms, electricity bills on the Solomon Islands, etc.
11
Benford’s Conclusion Multi digit numbers beginning with 1, 2 or 3 appear more frequently than multi digit numbers beginning with 4, 5, 6, etc. The frequency of which these digits appear in nature was published in “The Law of Anomalous Numbers”
12
PercentagesPercentages Percentages Digit - Position in Number 1 st 2 nd 3 rd 1.301.113.1013 2.176.108.1009 3.124.104.1005 4.096.100.1001 5.079.096.0997 6.066.093.0994
13
PercentagesPercentages First DigitFirst Digit First Digit 123123 Area Rivers3116.410.7 Populations33.920.414.2 Newpapers301812 Pressure29.618.312.8 Mol. Weight26.725.215.4 Atomic Weight47.218.75.5 X-Ray Volts27.917.514.4 Batting Averages32.717.612.6 Death Rate2718.615.7 Average30.618.512.4 Probable Error0.80.40.4
14
Conclusion Cont. The number 1 predominates every step of most progressions. Stock Market example: Assume 20% annual return on a $1,000 investment. It takes 4 years for the stock to go from $1,000 to $2,000, approximately 3 years to go from $2,000 to $3,000, approximately 2 years to go from $3,000 to $4,000. Before long you start over at 1 or $10,000.
15
Conclusion Cont. Months in which Investment ranged between: $1,000 and $1,9994129.50% $2,000 and $2,9992517.99% $3,000 and $3,9991712.23% $4,000 and $4,9991410.07% $5,000 and $5,999117.91% $6,000 and $6,99996.47% $7,000 and $7,99985.76% $8,000 and $8,99975.04% $9,000 and $9,99975.04%
16
Stock Market Example Sample of 12,00 stock market quotes from the Wall Street Journal.
17
Actual Expected Actual Expected FrequencyFrequencyFrequencyFrequency Difference Digit 13364361927.98%30.10%-2.12% Digit 21554211612.93%17.60%-4.67% Digit 3118215029.83%12.49%-2.66% Digit 41240116510.31%9.69%0.62% Digit 510269528.53%7.92%0.61% Digit 611038049.17%6.69%2.48% Digit 78976977.46%5.80%1.66% Digit 88206166.82%5.12%1.70% Digit 98365516.95%4.58%2.37% 12,022 Stock Market Example
18
Newcomb vs. Benford Benford also did not have an explanation for this phenomena, however, at least he had evidence that demonstrated the laws ubiquity. The theory remained unchallenged, but failed to generate any publicity.
19
19611961 Research conducted revealed that Benford’s probabilities are scale invariant, therefore, it doesn't’t matter if the numbers are denominated in dollars, yens, marks, pesos, rubbles, etc.
20
BettingBetting Other than proving the financial reasonableness of forecasts, the main use for Benford’s Law was used for making money by betting with unsuspecting friends.
21
Mark Nigrini In 1992, Nigrini published a thesis noting that Benford’s Law could be used to detect fraud.
22
How Does this help us? Because human choices are not random, invented numbers are unlikely to follow Benford’s Law, I.e., when people invent numbers, their digit patterns (which have been artificially added to a list of true numbers) will cause the data set to appear unnatural. Source: Mark Nigrini
23
Five Major Digit Tests. 1st digit test 2nd digit test First two digits First three digits Last two digits Source: Mark Nigrini
24
First Digit Test High Level Test Will only identify the blinding glimpse of the obvious Should not be used to select audit samples, as the sample size will be too large. Sourec: Mark Nigrini
25
Second Digit Test Also a high level test Used to identify conformity Should not be used to select audit samples Source: Mark Nigrini
26
First Two Digits Test More focused Identifies manifested deviations for further review Can be used to select audit targets for preliminary review Source: Mark Nigrini
27
First Three Digits Test Highly Focused Used to select audit samples Tends to identify number duplication Source: Mark Nigrini
28
Last Two Digits Test Used to identify Invented (overused) and rounded numbers Expected proportion of all possible last two digit combinations is.01 Source: Mark Nigrini
29
Not all Data Conforms!!!!!!!!! The data set should describe similar data (populations of towns) Artificial limits should not exist (no minimum sale amount) The data can’t consist or pre-arranged numbers (SSN, Tel Numbers) The data should consist of more small items than large items
30
Not all Data Conforms The data should not be a subset of a set Does not work if data has been aggregated, I.e. daily deposits are combined and recorded weekly Data should relate to s specific period The data population should be large enough so that the proportions can manifest themselves
31
Fraud Cases What will you generally see: Fraudster starts out small then increases the dollar amount. The amounts will be just below a limit that requires further review. The numbers will not follow a digital pattern. The amounts will not be rounded, and certain digit patterns will be repeated. Source: Mark Nigrini
32
ExampleExample Examined over 1,000 cash disbursements (entire population) during the year (amounts over $500 required 2 signatures and amounts over $5,000 required competitive bids). Sample is on next slide
33
ExampleExample AmountDescription Check. No. $225.95 SEIU - LU 82 ED ASSES FUND 6/98.4001 $1,212.97 SCHINDLER ELEV CORP JUN 98.4002 $4,999.50 YORK INT CORP - 7/98-9/98.4003 $339.13 US FOODSERVICE 10/29/98.4004 $473.98 VIRGINIA DEPT OF TAXATION JUNE '98 4005 $250.81 W W GRAINGER INC - SUPPLIES 4006 $504.00 LJC LIGHTING SUPPLY - LIGHT BULBS.4007 $171.70 CLERK, DC SUPERIOR COURT 12/25/98.4008 $225.15 SEIU - SEIU LU 82 ED ASSES FD 9/98.4009 $477.26 VIRGINIA DEPT OF TAXATION -1998.4010
34
Expected First Digit Frequency
35
Actual First Digit Frequency
36
Expected First and Second Digit Frequency
37
Actual First and Second Digit Frequency
38
13 30 47 - 50 77 93 87
39
Actual First and Second Digit Frequency 13 30 47 - 50 77 93 87 Regular payroll garnishment.. Monthly supply contract for $303. Maint. Contract. Kay Grogan Food/Bev. Company uses ARAMARK. Pest Control. Possible structuring to avoid authorization thresholds.
40
Applying Benford’s Law Income tax agencies. Audits of Accounts Payable (I/A, Ext. Auditors, Fraud Examiners, etc). Expenses reimbursements.
41
Who Uses This US West, Sprint, Colgate, P&G, Nortel, American Airlines, United Airlines, Ameritech, Lockheed Martin, KPMG, ARCO, State of Texas. Source: Mark Nigrini
42
Cost of Data Analysis Software $245 for 13 programs which run on Excel 97 or Excel 2000. $795 for all programs. Works with ACL and Idea. Source: Mark Nigrini
43
CautionCaution Does not work with Lottery May not work for certain types of expenses in which documentation is not required for expenses under a certain category. Authorization Levels.
44
CautionCaution It only works with natural numbers (those numbers that are not ordered in a particular numbering scheme, I.e., telephone numbers, social security numbers. CAUTION
45
CautionCaution The sample should be large enough so that the predicted proportions can assert themselves, and they should be free of artificial limits. I.E., don’t analyze the prices of 10 different types of beer, as the sample is small and the prices are forced by competition to stay within a narrow range. CAUTION
46
SummarySummary Benford’s Law provides a data analysis method that can help alert us to possible errors, biases, potential fraud, costly processing inefficiencies or other irregularities. STOP
47
ArticlesArticles Journal of Accountancy (5/99) New Scientist (7/99) Internal Auditor (2/99) Inside Fraud Bulletin (3/99) Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall of 1997) STOP
48
Articles Continued White Paper (4/94) White Paper (9/99) New York Times (8/4/98) Information Technology (9/97) STOP
49
Web Sites www.doc.ic.ac.uk www.maximag.co.uk/bull701.htm www.Nigrini.com/Benford’s_law STOP
50
Web Sites Benford’s Law Digital Analysis Fraud Detection Analytical Procedures STOP
51
BooksBooks Digital Analysis Using Benford’s Law (Mark Nigrini) STOP
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.