Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPeter Thornton Modified over 9 years ago
1
ANOVAs
2
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Difference in two or more average scores in different groups Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor); but can include multiple predictors
3
Differences between the groups are separated into two sources of variance ◦ Variance from within the group ◦ Variance from between the groups The variance between groups is typically of interest
4
Use when: ◦ you are examining differences between groups on one or more variables, ◦ the participants in the study were tested only once and ◦ you are comparing more than two groups
5
Factor: the variable that designates the groups to be compared Levels: the individual comparable parts of the factor Factorial designs have more than one variable as a predictor of an outcome
6
F is based on variance, not mean differences Partial out the between condition variance from the within condition variance
7
F = MS between MS within MS between = SS between /df between MS within = SS within / df within
8
Therapist wants to examine the effectiveness of 3 techniques for treating phobias. Subjects are randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Below are the rated fear of spiders after therapy. X 1 : 5 2 5 4 2 X 2 : 3 3 0 2 2 X 3 : 1 0 1 2 1
9
1. State hypotheses Null hypothesis: spider phobia does not differ among the three treatment groups ◦ μ Treatement1 = μ Treatment2 = μ Treatment3 Research hypothesis: spider phobia differs in at least one treatment group compared to others OR there is an effect of at least one treatment on spider phobia ◦ X Treatment1 ≠ X Treatment2 ◦ X Treatment1 ≠ X Treatment3 ◦ X Treatment2 ≠ X Treatment3 ◦ X Treatment1 ≠ X Treatment2 ≠ X Treatment3 (just write this one for ease, but all are made)
10
F = MS between MS within MS between = SS between /df between MS within = SS within / df within
11
SS between = Σ(ΣX) 2 /n – (ΣΣX) 2 /N ΣX = sum of scores in each group ΣΣX = sum of all the scores across groups n = number of participants in each group N = number of participants (total)
12
SS within = ΣΣ(X 2 ) – Σ(ΣX) 2 /n ΣΣ(X 2 ) = sum of all the sums of squared scores Σ(ΣX) 2 = sum of the sum of each group’s scores squared n = number of participants in each group
13
Ss total = ΣΣ(X 2 ) – (ΣΣX) 2 /N ΣΣ(X 2 ) = sum of all the sums of squared scores (ΣΣX) 2 = sum of all the scores across groups squared N = total number of participants (in all groups)
14
F = MS between MS within MS between = SS between /df between Df between = k-1 (k=# of groups)
15
6. Determine whether the statistic exceeds the critical value ◦ 6.01 > 3.89 ◦ So it does exceed the critical value 7. If over the critical value, reject the null & conclude that there is a significant difference in at least one of the groups
16
For an ANOVA, the test statistic only tells you that there is a difference It does not tell you which groups were different from other groups There are numerous post-hoc tests that you can use to tell the difference Here, we will use Bonferroni corrected post- hoc tests because they are already familiar (similar to t-tests, but with corrected critical value levels to reduce Type 1 error rates)
17
In results ◦ There was a significant effect of type of treatment on spider phobia, F(2, 12) = 6.01, p <.05. With post-hoc tests ◦ There was a significant effect of type of treatment on spider phobia, F(2, 12) = 6.01, p <.05. Participants who received treatment X 3 were less afraid of spiders (M = 1.00, SD = 0.71) than participants who received treatment X 1 (M = 3.60, SD = 1.52), t(8) = 3.47, p =.008, but did not differ from participants who received treatment X 2 (M = 2.00, SD = 1.22, t(8) = 1.58, n.s. Participants who received treatments X 1 and X 2 did not significantly differ, t(8) = 1.84, n.s. If it had not been significant: ◦ There was no significant effect of type of treatment on spider phobia, F(2, 12) = 2.22, n.s.
18
Source Type III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Corrected Model 17.200(a)28.6006.000.016 Intercept 72.6001 50.651.000 cond 17.20028.6006.000.016 Error 17.200121.433 Total 107.00015 Corrected Total 34.40014
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.