1. “ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President Innovative Environmental Technologies, Inc. 6071 Easton Road Pipersville, PA 18947 www.iet-inc.net

2. IET In-Situ Delivery Process Step #1 – Pathway Development - Confirms “Soil Break” and open delivery process - Opens Preexisting Soil Fissures Compressed Gas Feed Step #2 – Sequenced Remedial Compound Injections - Prepares Subsurface for Remedial Process Liquid #1 Feed - Oxygen Scavengers under anaerobic processes - Dilute H2O2 under Aerobic processes - Colloidal ZVI under Fenton’s Process -pH adjusts – Calcite, Manganese Oxide, H2SO4 Step #3 – Remedial Compound(s) Injections Liquid #2 Feed - Viscous Liquids (lactates, butyrates, HRC) - Hydrogen Peroxide - Magnesium Peroxide; Calcium Peroxide -Colloidal Suspensions – KMnO4, Na MnO4 Step #4 – Final Step Compressed Gas Feed - Clears Lines - Drives materials into formation - Prevents surface escape and spills Completes Injection Event

3. Injection Equipment

5. Single injection event at a wood treating facility in Midwestern United States in July 2013 to remediate soils and groundwater impacted by the historical release of heavy ended petroleum compounds. Total treatment area of approximately 82,000 square feet, treating between 13 and 22 feet below ground surface. Provect-Ox™ Case Study 1  91 injection points  Spaced 34 ft apart  22,022 lbs of Provect-OX MW-16 MW-17 MW-7A MW-6

6. Case Study 1 - Groundwater SVOC Analytical Data

7. Single injection event implemented at a former gas station in Northern New Jersey in August 2013 to remediate soils and groundwater impacted by the historical release of BTEX compounds. Total treatment area of approximately 3,100 square feet, treating between 4 and 14 feet below ground surface. Provect-OX™ Case Study 2  26 injection points  Spaced 8-10 ft apart  4,392 lbs of Provect OX

8. Case Study 2 – Field Parameters & VOC Analytical Data MW-2 Sampling Date06/20/201310/02/201311/26/201302/28/201405/28/2014 Benzene (ppb)ND7.2043.4ND Toluene (ppb)ND2.330.38ND Ethylbenzene (ppb)ND4.08ND Total Xylenes (ppb)ND21.043.16ND MW-2 Sampling Date06/20/201310/02/201311/26/201302/28/201405/28/2014 pH7.276.886.896.867.43 ORP (mV)-14+220+86+55-40 D.O. (mg/L)2.170.760.900.850.83 Conductivity (mS/cm)0.973.441.522.381.55 Temperature ( o C)17.720.417.012.214.3 Groundwater Elevation (ft)94.0590.4388.8692.9393.70 Sulfate (mg/L)56.61,510266980332 Total Iron (mg/L)0.3772.010.1490.0890.160 Dissolved Iron (mg/L)0.2491.830.0097ND

9. Case Study 2 – Field Parameters & VOC Analytical Data MW-5 Sampling Date06/201310/201311/201302/2014 05/201409/201412/2014 pH 6.786.716.686.716.496.956.68 ORP (mV) -23+230+180+95-68-78+118 D.O. (mg/L) 0.321.080.564.320.990.963.13 Conductivity (mS/cm) 1.051.242.004.612.571.892.01 Temperature ( o C) 17.721.716.88.814.322.814.2 Groundwater Elevation (ft) 93.3590.4389.1492.5693.2091.2792.25 Sulfate (mg/L) 70.9123.0247.0339.0279.0343.0314 Total Iron (mg/L) 4.855.444.645.8414.35.162.04 Dissolved Iron (mg/L) 3.533.243.223.9112.04.260.35 MW-5 Sampling Date06/201310/201311/201302/2014 05/201409/201412/2014 Benzene (ppb) 3.381.910.52ND1.27ND Toluene (ppb) 1.710.21 J0.16ND0.57ND Ethylbenzene (ppb) 15.60.4 JND 14.2ND Total Xylenes (ppb) 25.941.98 J0.37ND7.85ND

10. Single injection event at a former gas station upstate New York to address soil and groundwater contamination due to the historical release of BTEX compounds. Total treatment area of 9,225 square foot area, treating between 9 and 15 feet below ground surface. Provect-OX™ Case Study 2  39 injection points  Spaced 12-20 ft apart  8,006 lbs of Provect OX

11. Case Study 3 – Geochemical and VOC Data Sulfate and Iron Utilized as Terminal Electron Acceptors to Sustain Bioremediation and Minimize Rebound

12. Provect-OX™ combines multiple ISCO and enhanced biological processes Safely catalyzed process without the Hazards of Extreme Activation No Heat Generated – minimizes gassing and surfacing issues Uses Fe 3+ as activator (no persulfate “Mandated Supplier”) Long-lived reactions – sustained treatment manages rebound Demonstrated effectiveness under field conditions Cost-effective – reduces need for multiple injection events CONCLUSIONS

13. “Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment” Questions