1. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research The Student Assessment and Classification Working Group Marie Stowell and Harvey Woolf

2. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research Context What we’ve done – SACWG’s research SACWG’s sustainability

3. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research Context Who we are Academics and administrators with professional and personal interest in assessment Chance beginning 1994 prompted by a conference paper on comparative student performance across subjects Targeted ‘membership’ Involvement in modular schemes with access to data

4. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG’s Research Subject and institutional marking practices Undergraduate degree classification Undergraduate and postgraduate regulatory frameworks

5. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research Subject and institutional marking practices Subject variations in mark distributions Use of percentage versus grading marking scales Grade inflation and assessment strategies Learning outcomes and assessment criteria Summative assessment methods

6. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research Undergraduate degree classification Inter-institutional variations in award algorithms and impact on degree class Subject and institutional variations in degree class awarded Impact of discounting some module marks in calculating degree class

7. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research Undergraduate and postgraduate regulatory frameworks Complexity, variety and inconsistency of classification assessment regulations Rules for dealing with ‘weak’ and ‘failed’ student performance Structure and differentiation in postgraduate awards

8. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG’s research themes Benchmarking assessment practices Mining datasets Problematising academic standards and ‘graduateness’ Variability versus equitability Our current work on assessment of Work-based Learning reflects these themes

9. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG’s research methodologies Comparative statistical analysis of institutional data-sets Analysis of institutional regulatory frameworks and assessment documents Small-scale surveys

10. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG is sustainable because we have… Continuity of membership BUT frequent renewal Members who can access institutional data A mix of skills, expertise, experience: administrators, academic managers, researchers, writers

11. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG is sustainable because we have… Remained informal – e.g., no constitution, standing orders, committee, decisions by consensus Low cost administration – sharing of tasks, e.g., note taking; accommodating personal assistants Some external income is available

12. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG is sustainable because we… Work across institutions Focus on issues - of continuing practical and academic interest for members and their institutions - of current concern Explore largely uncharted areas Have specific outcomes - publications - annual national workshops

13. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG is sustainable because… National workshops have confirmed that the work is of value to the sector have provided an external and public forum for SACWG’s work generate a small surplus

14. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research SACWG is sustainable because… Projects are -Circumscribed -Feasible -SMART -Of significance for institutions and the sector

15. June 2008 SACWG Self-help and Institutional Research David Turner’s summary S hared leadership A ctive participation C ommunality of interest W elcoming atmosphere G roup working