2.  SYSTEM - an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole  KPREP testing is one measure of our school system

3. Combination of parts  Board of Education  Departments – transportation, finance, food service, health services, human resources, facilities, special education, curriculum and instruction, technology, learning support, attendance, and public relations  Roles – teachers, counselors, family resource, therapists, coaches, monitors, secretaries, clerks, paraeducators, custodians, adminstration

4. Combination of parts  Academic Achievement  Growth  GAP measures  Graduation Rates  College and Career Readiness Measures  Kindergarten Readiness (reported only)  Teacher Evaluation Results (reported only)  Program Reviews (arts, global competency, primary program, practical living)

5.  21 st in the state out of 173 school districts based upon the 2014-15 state assessment results.  The district received a “Distinguished” ranking for the second year in a row and ranks 4 th in Northern Kentucky! Campbell County is the highest ranking county district in the region!  Campbell County High School ranked 32 nd out of 228 high schools in the state and was classified “ Distinguished/Progressing”. Named a “School of Distinction”- the highest recognition for any school!

6.  Donald Cline Elementary Grant’s Lick Elementary Reiley Elementary received a “ Distinguished” classification.  Crossroads Elementary received a “Proficient/Progressing” classification.  Campbell County Middle School received a “Proficient” classification.  Campbell Ridge Elementary is above the state average for Elementary Schools.

7.  97 th percentile in Kentucky (on 2013 baseline)  School presentations throughout the year will share progress and strategies for improvement.

8.  Challenge – 100% College and Career Readiness.  Rigorous Delivery Targets

9.  Proficiency in Reading and Math  Closing the Achievement Gap  College and Career Readiness  Graduation Rate  Program Review  Kindergarten Readiness  Based on 2009-10 Baseline Score. Calculation is the same across the state. EXAMPLE  Program Review – Target 89.7 State Target 69  Actual Score – 88.9 State Actual Score 78.8  CCS did not meet target. State met target.

12.  Elementary Reading 46.6 to 49.4  Middle School Reading 41.2 to 46.7  High School Reading 45.2 to 57.1  Elementary Math 40.2 to 46.1  Middle School Math 41.6 to 42.7  High School Math 35.4 to 37.7

15. 13-1414-15

16.  State Funded – 38.3  Child Care – 64.3  Home – 34.0  Other – 52.4  Unknown  Any – 48.9  The designation of "Ready" or "Not Ready" is generated from scores in the domains of Academic/Cognitive, Language Development, and Physical Development. Self-Help and Social-Emotional Scores are self reported by parents/guardians and are not calculated into the "Ready" or "Not Ready" designation

17. District Improvement Planning Kindergarten Readiness Initiative

18.  Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (PGES)  This year including Other Professionals (Media Specialists, Psychologists, Instructional Specialists, Counselors, Speech Pathologists)  Exploring District Others as this evolves Focus on consistency, high quality, student and educator growth.

19.  Succeed  Succeed at the HIGHEST LEVELS  FOCUS on Growth  Commit to Closing the Achievement Gap  Challenge Ourselves to Meet Rigorous Targets  Support and Expect Highest Quality Teaching and Learning A System Designed to Deliver 100% College, Career, and Life Readiness for our students!