Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)

2 PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Plaintiff- Dred Scott Defendant- Sandford

3 FACTS Controversy began in 1833. A surgeon purchased a slave and moved him to the Wisconsin Territory. Slavery was banned in this area due to the Missouri Compromise.

4 JURISDICTION The Supreme court had jurisdiction. African Americans could not sue in a federal court because they were not citizens of the United States.

5 APPEALED? This case appealed to the Supreme Court because Dred Scott could not sue in federal court because of his citizenship but he could in a Supreme Court.

6 RULING 7 votes for Sandford; in favor 2 votes for Dred Scott Dred Scott lost because he was not a US citizen so he couldn’t take his case to a federal court, so he remained a slave. Although Dred Scott became free once entering Illinois and Wisconsin, depriving someone without compensation for taking his property violated the 5 th amendment, which proves that Dred Scott is still a slave.

7 LANDMARK COURT CASE It was a landmark court case. The case couldn’t be viewed in the federal court. Dred Scott tried to get it appealed in the Supreme Court.

8 IMPACT This case drew a clear line of how the government stood on the issue of slavery, and further inflamed passions surrounding an already divisive topic with American Politics.

9 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Argument of the case: Dred Scott became free once entering Illinois and Wisconsin, depriving someone without compensation for taking his property violated the 5 th amendment, which proves that Dred Scott is still a slave. The Supreme Court, in an infamous opinion written by Chief Taney, ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to take Scott's case because Scott was, or at least had been, a slave.

10 OVERVIEW OF THE CASE Dred Scott was purchased by Sandford as a slave outside of the United States, making him not a US citizen. When he was brought into the Wisconsin Territory it was made clear that slavery was banned, so he tried to sue Sandford. Being that you can’t sue in a federal court system, his case was overlooked, giving Sandford the votes.


Download ppt "Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google