Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDonna Thornton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)
2
PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT Plaintiff- Dred Scott Defendant- Sandford
3
FACTS Controversy began in 1833. A surgeon purchased a slave and moved him to the Wisconsin Territory. Slavery was banned in this area due to the Missouri Compromise.
4
JURISDICTION The Supreme court had jurisdiction. African Americans could not sue in a federal court because they were not citizens of the United States.
5
APPEALED? This case appealed to the Supreme Court because Dred Scott could not sue in federal court because of his citizenship but he could in a Supreme Court.
6
RULING 7 votes for Sandford; in favor 2 votes for Dred Scott Dred Scott lost because he was not a US citizen so he couldn’t take his case to a federal court, so he remained a slave. Although Dred Scott became free once entering Illinois and Wisconsin, depriving someone without compensation for taking his property violated the 5 th amendment, which proves that Dred Scott is still a slave.
7
LANDMARK COURT CASE It was a landmark court case. The case couldn’t be viewed in the federal court. Dred Scott tried to get it appealed in the Supreme Court.
8
IMPACT This case drew a clear line of how the government stood on the issue of slavery, and further inflamed passions surrounding an already divisive topic with American Politics.
9
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Argument of the case: Dred Scott became free once entering Illinois and Wisconsin, depriving someone without compensation for taking his property violated the 5 th amendment, which proves that Dred Scott is still a slave. The Supreme Court, in an infamous opinion written by Chief Taney, ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to take Scott's case because Scott was, or at least had been, a slave.
10
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE Dred Scott was purchased by Sandford as a slave outside of the United States, making him not a US citizen. When he was brought into the Wisconsin Territory it was made clear that slavery was banned, so he tried to sue Sandford. Being that you can’t sue in a federal court system, his case was overlooked, giving Sandford the votes.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.