1. ETMSoE Off-campus Task Force Committee Report

2. The Charge What support does off-campus teaching require? How do we ensure faculty teaching off- campus are part of the Clemson community? How should off-campus and on-campus programs relate and coordinate? How do we ensure off-campus courses/programs are financially viable?

3. Survey Overview Open March 23-27, 2009 N = 43 (approximately 53%) Likert & Open-ended items Off-campus programming / UCG – Involvement/Experience – Delivery modes – Potential – Concerns

4. What are the present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Greatest potential: a.“Blended” on-site & online b.Traditional face-to-face, site-based c.Online professional development d.Videoconference-based, multi-site e.Online degrees

5. My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Greatest concerns: a.Administrative assistance and clerical support b.IT Support c.Professional networking d.Infrastructure for non-traditional graduate students e.Infrastructure for research grants

6. Guiding Questions How do we make off-campus programming more systemic and widespread? How do we build and maintain an appropriate culture while moving off-campus? What strategies should we use to move our off-campus agenda forward at Clemson?