Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBeryl Bradford Modified over 9 years ago
1
MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux 2001-2004 Cloud Fraction Mean 1 0.5 0
2
Do they represent known physical phenomenon well? What is L3 saying? ₪ Some limitations of L3 SDSs ₪ How do we interpret the data effectively? decrease the limitations improve physical meaning and interpretation How do the MODIS L3 products look: Going from information to knowledge: Next steps:
3
DJF High Cloud DJF All Cloud HIRS Aqua Terra Aqua 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0
4
Dust or high aerosol events 200 400 600 800 1000 mb Cloud Top Pressure May 1 st, 2003 ₪ Events last several days ₪ Few if any visible clouds ₪ 750-900 mb ₪ For daily data this can be accounted for, but not weekly or monthly.
5
0 200 400 600 800 Aqua Terra Difference -800 -400 0 400 800 Cloud Ice Water Path December 2002 Major ice cloud events? g/m^2
6
0 150 300 Difference Cloud Liquid Water Path December 2002 Aqua Terra g/m^2 -150 0 150 Major liquid cloud events?
7
Possible Solutions: 0 15 30 Ocean Mass Concentration ₪ Conduct secondary data processing ₪ Remove questionable data ₪ Create uncertainty products 0 500 1000 Cloud Top Pressure 1x10^-6 g/m^2mb
8
0 15 30 45 60 µm 0 200 400 600 800 0 250 500 750 1000 g/m^2 mb Ice Particle Size and Tropical Deep Convection Evolution -Uniform re ice over cores -Isolated deep convection -Evident cirrus shields ₪ Ice particle size increase away from deep convection Ice Particle Radius Ice Water Path Cloud Top Pressure ₪ What would scatter plots show?
9
Mean SDS Comparisons ₪ Mean phase properties can’t be fully characterized
10
0 15 30 45 60 Ice Effective Radius (µm) Cloud Top Pressure (mb) Ice Effective Radius (µm) Water Path of Ice (g/m^2) 0 1000 2000 0 500 1000 IWP vs Re Ice CTP vs Re Ice ₪ cloud regimes ₪ cloud height or phase ₪ particle size or path Ambiguous Property comparison limitations: ₪ data subsets (large particle size, phase, etc) ₪ multiple data set comparison Possible solutions: ₪ new joint histogram (in collection 5) ₪ means of property subsets ₪ multi dimensional histograms Mean Ice Properties:
11
Summary and Conclusions: ₪ Implement a secondary processing between L2 and L3. ₪ Add additional SDSs 1) that can be used to further compare the microphysical properties of clouds and other atmospheric parameters 2) that allow for a further intuitive interpretations 3) near nadir.
12
Image courtesy of MODIS Rapid Response Project at NASA/GSFC
17
Nov 2001
18
October 2002
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.