Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRandell Parks Modified over 9 years ago
1
Milli-arcsecond Imaging of the Inner Regions of Protoplanetary Disks Stéphanie Renard In collaboration with F. Malbet, E. Thiébaut, J.-P. Berger & M. Benisty « Planet Formation and Evolution: The Solar System and Extrasolar Planets » Tübingen, 2 March 2009
2
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 2 Outline Astrophysical context: Protoplanetary disks around young stellar objects (YSOs) Optical/IR interferometry: Technique & Observables Image reconstruction Application on real data of YSOs: HD 45677 MWC 275 Conclusions & Perspectives
3
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 3 Astrophysical context: physical conditions in the close environment of young stellar objects Characteristics & Phenomena Stars from 4000 to 10000K Accretion disk (Keplerian or not): gas + dust Strong outflowing winds Companions Magnetospheric accretion Protoplanets Physical conditions of the dust inner disk: Radius from 0.1 to 10 AU Temperature from 150 to 4000K Velocity from 10 to a few 100 km/s Instrument requirements: 1 µm ≤ ≤ 10 µm Spatial resolution from 0.5 to 70 mas (at 150 pc ; Taurus system) Optical/IR Interferometry Dust Wind Accretion disk Magnetosphere Gas Planet
4
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 4 Optical/IR interferometry: observables Concept: Coherent recombination of the beams from several telescopes High angular resolution Observables: fringe pattern Squared visibilities V (size of the object) Loss of phase φ because of the atmospheric turbulence Closure phases (asymmetry of the object) Analysis of the data: Model fitting Image reconstruction Model independent VLTI, ESO Paranal, Chile I V φ ddm k i j φ ij φ jk φ ki CP ijk = φ ij + φ jk + φ ki
5
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 5 Optical/IR interferometry: image reconstruction Image formation Goal of image reconstruction: retrieve I true Ill-conditioned problem (infinity of solutions which fit the data in the error bars) additional constraints Method: Maximum a posteriori Use of MIRA algorithm of Eric Thiébaut (Thiébaut et al. 2008, Proc. SPIE 7013, 70131I) Likelihood term: compatibility of the solution with the data Prior penalty: Additional constraints Gaussian statistic: ² Weight factor Fourier transform Positivity of the solution Normalization Smoothness regularization
6
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 6 1 st YSO: HD 45677 – 1. Description Herbig Be type (?) Monnier et al. 2006 “First closure phase survey of Herbig Ae/Be stars” parametric imaging highly skewed dust ring (i.e. the brightest part of a disk in the NIR infrared) Data used for the image reconstruction: Monnier et al. 2006 IOTA interferometer H Band Monnier et al. 2006
7
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 7 1 st YSO: HD 45677 – 2. MIRA results Reconstructed image (reduced ²~2): central star + clumpy features on an ellipse (?!) Prior: smoothness (independent of the chosen prior)
8
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 8 1 st YSO: HD 45677 – 3. Analysis Method: Choose a model (e.g. star + Gaussian ring) Compute the Fourier Transform of the model and determine the squared visibilities & closure phases Take the observables exactly at the same u,v points than the real data Keep the same error bars than the real data Reconstruct a new image Try to find a model which gives a reconstructed image as close as possible to the one from the real data 1st model: star + Gaussian ring Problem: symmetric model closure phases = 0 !
9
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 9 1 st YSO: HD 45677 – 3. Analysis 2 nd model: star + skewed Gaussian ring Problem: features only on a side of the star 3rd model: star + off-centered Gaussian ring
10
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 10 1 st YSO: HD 45677 – 4. Conclusions Best model according to the image reconstruction: Star + off-centered Gaussian ring Physical interpretation: flared disk Radius9 ± 0.14 mas Inclination35 ± 2 ° Position angle78 ± 3.5 ° Shift x0.5 ± 0.2 mas Shift y-2 ± 0.1 mas Need data at longer baselines in order to distinguish between different models Image reconstruction: The features seem to be an intern problem: why and how avoid them ? (work in progress) New approach: determination of new models by the image reconstruction results Monnier et al. 2006
11
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 11 2 nd YSO: MWC 275 – 1. Description Herbig Ae star Data used for the image reconstruction: Benisty et al., in prep VLTI/AMBER interferometer spectral dispersion over H and K band Devine and Grady et al. 2000 “A Ly bright jet from a Herbig Ae Star”: Collimated bipolar outflow (HH409) perpendicular to the disk
12
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 12 2 nd YSO: MWC 275 – 2. MIRA results Consistent with previous work and jet direction K Band H Band
13
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 13 Conclusions & Perspectives First images on real interferometric data of complex YSOs New approach: determination of new models by the image reconstruction results Work on one of the issues of YSOs: the disk shape Image reconstruction in optical interferometry: a new technique in progress Difficulties (in contrast to image reconstruction in radio): Sparse (u,v) coverage Lack of phase information systematic tests on the MIRA algorithm Reconstructed images independent of the added constraints robust results First steps towards the 1mas-imaging with the new imager instruments at VLTI
14
Stéphanie Renard Tübingen Conference 2 March 2009 14 Thank you for your attention Another astrophysical object: The Mira Star T Lep Le Bouquin et al. 2009, A&A Letter “Pre-maximum spectro-imaging of the Mira star T Lep with AMBER/VLTI”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.