Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKaren Shelton Modified over 9 years ago
1
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001 G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM 1 W single crystal advancement. 1) Manufacturing. 2) Images after EDM. 3) Images after grinding. 3) Images after electropolishing. 4) Conclusions.
2
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM2 Manufacturing of discs. W single crystal EDM: Electrical Discharge Machining = Electro-erosion EP: Electropolishing EDM cutting Grinding EP: -12.6µm EDM conditions are similar than for the CERN Workshop irises. They can be optimised for better finishing. Grinding was feasible: all three were accidentally banged only one broke. Only a first EP step. ?
3
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM3 As Electrical Discharge Machined. Severe surface cracking. Cracks follow well defined crystallographic directions. Flakes 35µm deep. 400µm 50x
4
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM4 As Electrical Discharge Machined. 20µm 100µm 1000x 200x
5
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM5 After grinding Cracks are no apparent. Similar to Plansee. 20µm 1000x
6
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM6 After Electropolishing Good smoothens Electrolyte agitation problem Traces of cracks 400µm 50x
7
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM7 Flueckiger Before Electropolishing (2/2) 20µm 100µm 1000x 200x
8
CLIC Meeting 21/08/2001G. Arnau Izquierdo EST/SM8 Conclusions. The effect of Electrical Discharge Machining is worst than for polycrystalline tungsten. Intense EP could be needed to get a smooth surface. EDM parameters can be further improved. Grinding is feasible. The feasibility of drilling the hole is to be checked. Good smoothness after EP of the ground surface. First test to be improved.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.