1. Open access and subscription journals: implications for low- and middle-income countries Moderated by Subhasree Raghavan Presented by Emma Veitch and Paul Volberding

2. Documenting our quest for knowledge Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society in 1665 Nature’s first edition in 1896 Einstein’s 1925 manuscript on relativity theory

3. Interacting with scientific publications

4. And along came the internet

5. Open access movement

6. New publishing models

7. Meet The Editors: Publishing HIV Research Access to Science a Right: Implications of Open Access for Low and Middle Income Countries Emma Veitch PLOS Medicine, PLOS ONE 7

8. Why Open Access? One point of view The internet makes low-cost redistribution possible: it can be done! “Serials Crisis”: Increasing costs of subscription journals  pressure on libraries all around the world It’s the principle – publicly funded research should be accessible by public, patients 8

9. 9 Why Open Access? Another point of view

10. Figure 2. The development of open access publishing 1993–2009. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, et al. (2011) The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE 6(6): e20961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020961 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

11. 11 “Widening access to the outputs of research….has the potential to contribute substantially to furthering the progress of scientific and other research…”

12. There’s a big difference between FREE and OPEN OPEN = “…free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.” Budapest definition of Open Access 12

13. What’s the problem with FREE? 13

15. What can Open Access offer for LAMIC? Reader Rights: Access, Reuse, Redistribution Author Benefits from increased reader access: possible citation advantage, potential for work to reach a far wider readership CC-BY license permits unrestricted translation into any language Compatible with institution archiving; visibility for local research output 15

16. Open Access enables reuse e.g. translation

17. What are the Challenges for Open Access in LAMIC Right Now? PLOS and other OA publishers have shown OA is a viable business model…. For many journals, OA model depends on publication fees We want to encourage LAMIC authors to have equity in publishing their work – but the publication fee model can create a problem! What PLOS does: waiver system, no questions asked International Advisory Group reviewing financial model and making recommendations for changes http://www.plos.org/about/people/international-advisory- group/ 17

18. More Challenges for OA in LAMIC 18 OA facilitates unlimited access and reuse But what is the reality? We collect (and publicly display) access data, social metricsfor all our articles Can analyse data on country of origin for accesses via IP address Anecdotal evidence from LAMIC librarians: well informed about OA principles; not aware of what’s available in PLOS journals OA material not well reflected in library catalogues and material available locally in LAMIC Bandwidth issues: OA publishers need to do m-web well & sites that deliver in lo-bandwidth settings

19. Even More Challenges for publishing in LAMIC 19 Submission + editorial process can be very daunting Need to do more to encourage publication Mentoring schemes for researchers – eg AuthorAID http://www.authoraid.i nfo/ Not just relevant for OA

20. Even more challenges for OA – all countries! Funders and govt’s are going the whole hog Is there going to be more ££ for OA mandates? Maybe not, in UK at least 20

21. In conclusion…. 21 OA has a lot to offer for authors and readers in LAMIC But there are hurdles we need to overcome Publication fee barriers Making the most of access and reuse rights that OA offers Encouraging submissions from LAMIC and building editorial capacity outside of hi-income countries

22. My Competing Interests 22 I’m a full time employee of PLOS My salary’s not linked to the number of articles I handle or publication fees that are paid by authors Other than PLOS salary I don’t have any other sources of income (unfortunately) I’ve had some reimbursement for local travel costs (and things like conference dinners) for involvement in publishing initiatives such as those of the EQUATOR group, which develops guidelines for how to better report scientific studies More details are at http://www.plosmedicine.org/static/editorsInterests.action#eveitch