Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBuck Parks Modified over 9 years ago
1
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels ECBOL business model Leo Kriegsman (NCB Naturalis)
2
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels starting point physical infrastructure (labs) & digital infrastructure (data) globally networked through CBOL, data via BOLD iBOL launch Sept 2010, Guelph (ECBOL influential) European node (to be) networked through Eur. Consortium Barcoding of Life (ECBOL) NEtwork of Leading Labs (NELL) European Barcode of Life Database (QBOL: EU FP8 project on quarantine organisms) EDIT partners participate, but do not dominate/control strong involvement from outside EDIT/CETAF (Italy, Bavaria,..)
3
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels ECBOL2 meeting Portugal organised by CBS Utrecht, MNHN Paris, Smithsonian, Univ. of Minho 147 participants from 21 countries (27 from 12 EDIT inst.) 103 presentations (26 from 12 EDIT inst.), 46 oral conclusion: EDIT is one of many players (20%) action: apply for network funding from ESF needed: funding proposal for massive barcoding in Europe, incl. barcoding of collection specimens in NH museums
4
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels elements of business plan coordinator & secretariat & webmaster & deputies (all part-time) budget composed of fees and project funds highest fees => core group high level of independence & responsability progress reports to directors 20% to Network Office ?
5
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels elements of business plan coordinator & secretariat & webmaster & deputies (all part-time) budget composed of fees and project funds highest fees => core group high level of independence & responsability progress reports to directors 20% to Network Office ? 0.2 fte (costs in k€) managersecretariatwebsite & newsletter travelhosting, material, etc.total annual cost 2010 050
6
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels model 1 (2 institutions) 1% of 5-year national projects => 30 k€ hosts 2x 10 k€ this would raise 50 k€ for the operation extra contributions facilities (host) staff time (core group) meeting attendance (all) consequence: developments controlled by hosts & external partners core group
7
EDIT Review 27 & 28 May 2010, Brussels model 2 (22 institutions) 1% of 5-year national projects => 30 k€ hosts 2x 5 k€ largest institutions 5x 3 k€ other institutions 5x 1 k€ this would raise 50 k€ for the operation, plus 10 k€ (20%) for the NO extra contributions facilities (host) staff time (core group) meeting attendance (all) consequence: more control by directors over developments core group
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.