Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorena Morton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Successes of Energy Efficiency: The United States and California National Environmental Trust May 2, 2007 Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission (916) 654-4930 ARosenfe@Energy.State.CA.US http://www.energy.ca.gov/commission/commissioners/rosenfeld.html or just Google “Art Rosenfeld”
2
2 12% of GDP = $1.7 Trillion 7% of GDP = $1.0 Trillion
3
3
4
4 How Much of The Savings Come from Efficiency? uEasiest to tease out is cars –In the early 1970s, only 14 miles per gallons –Now about 21 miles per gallon –If still at 14 mpg, we’d consume 75 billion gallons more and pay $225 Billion more at 2006 prices –But we still pay $450 Billion per year –If California wins the “Schwarzenegger-Pavley” suit, and it is implemented nationwide, we’ll save another $150 Billion per year uCommercial Aviation improvements save another $50 Billion per year uAppliances and Buildings are more complex –We must sort out true efficiency gains vs. structural changes (from smokestack to service economy).
5
5 Comparison of Fuel Economy – Passenger Vehicles
6
6 How Much of The Savings Come from Efficiency (cont’d)? uSome examples of estimated savings in 2006 based on 1974 efficiencies minus 2006 efficiencies uBeginning in 2007 in California, reduction of “vampire” or stand-by losses –This will save $10 Billion when finally implemented, nation-wide uOut of a total $700 Billion, a crude summary is that 1/3 is structural, 1/3 is from transportation, and 1/3 from buildings and industry.
7
7 Carbon Dioxide Intensity and Per Capita CO2 Emissions -- 2001 (Fossil Fuel Combustion Only) 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 0.000.100.200.300.400.500.600.700.800.901.00 intensity (tons of CO2 per 2000 US Dollar) Tons of CO2 per person Canada Australia S. Korea California Mexico United States Austria Belgium Denmark France Germany Italy Netherlands New Zealand Switzerland Japan
8
8
9
9 2005 Differences = 5,300 kWh/yr = $165/capita
10
10 Source: David Goldstein
11
11
12
12
13
13 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 3 Gorges 三峡 Refrigerators 冰箱 Air Conditioners 空调 TWh 2000 Stds 2005 Stds If EnergyStar TWH/Year 1.5 4.5 6.0 3.0 7.5 Value (billion $/year) Comparison of 3 Gorges to Refrigerator and AC Efficiency Improvements Savings calculated 10 years after standard takes effect. Calculations provided by David Fridley, LBNL Value of TWh 3 Gorges 三峡 Refrigerators 冰箱 Air Conditioners 空调 Wholesale (3 Gorges) at 3.6 c/kWh Retail (AC + Ref) at 7.2 c/kWh 三峡电量与电冰箱、空调能效对比 标准生效后, 10 年节约电量
14
14
15
15 CO2 Emissions in California: Historical and Projected
16
16 Energy Efficiency, 17% Renewable Energy, 10% Cleaner Power Plants, 9% Clean Cars, 28% Renewable Fuels, 2% Smart Growth, 15% Water Efficiency, 1% Forestry, 20% Other Strategies, 4% Strategies for Meeting California’s CO2 Goals in 2020 Total Reductions = 174 Million metric Tons CO2 equivalent
17
17 Source: Stabilization Wedges: Pacala and Socolow, Science Vol 305, page 968 Growth = 1.5%/yr
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.