1. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Proposed 2010-2015 Capital Program and the 2010 Capital Budget Presented to The Environment Committee August 11, 2009 Bryce Pickart Assistant General Manager A Clean Water Agency

2. Definitions Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 6-Year Plan 6-Year Plan Authorized Capital Program Authorized Capital Program Multi-Year Authorization Capital Budget Capital Budget Annual Appropriation

3. Proposed Schedule Capital Finance Plan Aug 25th Public Hearing and Adoption Nov, 2009 Aug 11th Capital Program and Budget Sep, 2009 Incorporate into the Unified Capital Improvement Program and Unified Capital Budget

4. Capital Improvement Program Expense History 1970 thru 2008 Average is $114 million 2009 Dollars

5. Capital Investment Drivers  Growth (defer as much as possible) -Development along Transportation Corridors -Rural Growth Centers  Rehabilitation -Infrastructure maintenance -Infiltration/Inflow reduction  Quality -Energy Reduction -Water Quality Improvements

7. Capital Project Identification Condition Assessment ProgramCondition Assessment Program Capacity/Growth AnalysisCapacity/Growth Analysis New Permits and RegulationsNew Permits and Regulations Infrastructure Projects (Roads, Transit, Utilities, Stadiums, et. al.)Infrastructure Projects (Roads, Transit, Utilities, Stadiums, et. al.) Regional Wastewater System PlanRegional Wastewater System Plan Local Comprehensive PlansLocal Comprehensive Plans

8. Capital Program Strategy 1. Meet our commitments 2. Take advantage of opportunities 3. Focus on rehabilitation (high risk of delay) 4. Defer growth projects

9. High Priority Projects  Commitments  Policy/System Statements/Comp Plans  Regulations/Permits  Safety and Security  Opportunities  Coordination with Infrastructure Projects  Energy Conservation/Recovery  Wastewater Re-use  High Risk Of Delay  Probability and Severity of Failure

10. Growth Projects Being Delayed  Plant projects deferred to 2014  Blue Lake Plant Expansion  Empire Plant Solids  Hastings Plant  Metro Plant Solids  Interceptor projects deferred several years  Northeast Area  Northwest Area  Southeast Anoka County  Projects being implemented 1-2 years later than planned  Victoria Area  Richfield Area  Chaska Lift Station  Golden Valley Interceptor  East Bethel Water Reclamation  New Germany WWTP

11. Capital Improvement Program Expenditures by Year ($ millions) 2010-2015 Total = $754 Million

12. Capital Improvement Program Cost Breakdown by Project Type Total Program 2010 - 2015 $754 million

13. Capital Improvement Program Comparison with previous years 2009 2008

14. Authorized Capital Program Requests  One New Project  Adjustments to Existing Projects  Deletion of Completed Projects

15. New Project  Metro Plant Nutrient Removal Request authorization for Preliminary Engineering Request $2,000,000 LakePepin TMDL Lake Pepin TMDL Public Hearing is Planned for Fall 2009

16.  Metro Plant Rehabilitation and Facilities Improvements Request $69,000,000 Request $69,000,000 Adjustments to Existing Projects

17. Blue Lake Plant Improvements Request ($34,000,000) Request ($34,000,000) Adjustments to Existing Projects

18. Maple Grove Brooklyn Park Adjustments to Existing Projects Elm Creek Interceptor Request $3,000,000 Request $3,000,000 Replenish Funds Used in Conjunction with the Trunk Highway 610 Extension Project

19. Adjustments to Existing Projects Golden Valley Area Improvements Request $1,000,000

20. Adjustments to Existing Projects Hopkins System Improvements Request $27,000,000

21.  Interceptor Rehabilitation - Trenchless Construction funding needed for Phase 3 Adjustments to Existing Projects Request $4,000,000 Request $4,000,000

22.  Lift Station Improvements Construction funding for 4 of the project’s lift stations Adjustments to Existing Projects Request $28,500,000 Request $28,500,000 L7 L30 L35 L66 Savage Mounds View Mahtomedi Crystal

23. Adjustments to Existing Projects Elko-New Market Interceptor Request ($7,000,000)

24. Summary of Adjustments $69,000,000-$34,000,000$3,000,000$1,000,000$27,000,000$4,000,000$28,500,000-$7,000,000 Metro Rehab. & Facilities Improvements Blue Lake Plant Improvements Elm Creek Interceptor Golden Valley Area Improvements Hopkins System Improvements Interceptor Rehabilitation – Trenchless Lift Station Improvements Elko-New Market Interceptor Existing Projects Adjustment $91,500,000 Subtotal Authorization Adjustments:

25. Deletion of Completed Projects 7 Projects $211,900,000 Projects will be completed in 2009 MWWTP Electrical Cable ReplacementMWWTP Electrical Cable Replacement MWWTP Solids – Odor Control, Centrifuge, Sludge StorageMWWTP Solids – Odor Control, Centrifuge, Sludge Storage Empire Plant Service Area CapacityEmpire Plant Service Area Capacity Dayton-Champlin InterceptorDayton-Champlin Interceptor Interceptor System Standby Power ImprovementsInterceptor System Standby Power Improvements Riverview Siphon (SP-230)Riverview Siphon (SP-230) Wastewater Facilities Security ImprovementsWastewater Facilities Security Improvements

26. Proposed Authorized Capital Program Summary 2009 Program New Project Adjustments$1,139,000,0002,000,00091,500,000 Completed Projects (211,900,000) (211,900,000) 2010 Program $1,020,600,000

27. Expenditures ($ millions) Proposed Authorized Capital Program 2010 Program $1,021 Pre-20092009Projected 2010 - 2015 $264$95$662

28. Proposed 2010 Capital Budget Projected 2009 Expenditures $100 Million 2010 Capital Budget $158 Million

29. Proposed Schedule Capital Finance Plan Aug 25th Public Hearing and Adoption Nov, 2009 Aug 11th Capital Program and Budget Sep, 2009 Incorporate into the Unified Capital Improvement Program and Unified Capital Budget