Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLiliana Byrd Modified over 9 years ago
1
HIV/STD Partner Services Recommendations Cindy Getty & Rheta Barnes Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention & STD Prevention National Centers for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention New and Improved
2
Overview Background on Partner Services Rationale and Process for Revising the Recommendations Emphasis of the New Recommendations Dissemination, Implementation and Next Steps
3
Background on Partner Services
4
What is Partner Services? A broad array of services that can be offered to persons with HIV and other STDs and their partners which includes: Working w/ infected patients/clients to identify partners Locating partners Notifying partners that they may have been exposed to STD/HIV Offering partners other prevention services
5
What is Purpose of Partner Services? PS is a prevention activity with the twin goals of: Interrupting disease transmission (infection control): public health and community benefit Providing services to partners so they can receive evaluation and treatment or entry to care: individual benefit
6
What is Purpose of Partner Services? Helping partners gain access to Medical evaluation Treatment or care Counseling Testing Other prevention services
7
Identify PS candidates (index patients) Contact index patients & interview about partners Notify partners of their exposure Provide counseling, testing, referral and/or treatment to partners PS Elements
8
PS – Functions Service Assists persons w/ HIV or STD with notifying partners & accessing medical care, prevention, & other services Assists partners with recognizing their risk, learning infection or disease status, and accessing medical, prevention, and other services Ethical Addresses partners’ “right to know” their risk Public Health Provides information that may be valuable for reducing transmission at the community level
9
Why Revise the Recommendations and How did CDC go About It?
10
Why Revise Recommendations? Poor coverage of reported HIV cases (index interviews, partner name elicitation, partner interviews) Separate HIV and STD Guidelines & two separate trainings related to PS: Integrate documents Reduce duplication, discrepancies, and confusion New information from literature & program experience
11
Why Revise Recommendations? Emerging issues HIV surveillance data not being shared with PS programs Need for ongoing partner services for person living with HIV Unanswered questions Use of Internet Emerging Technology
12
Who Assisted in the Development of Recommendations? Health Department employees (Directors, Program Managers and Disease Intervention Specialists) Community activists (CHAMP, NMAC) Professional organizations (NCSD, NASTAD, CSTE) Academia (Researchers, Ethicists) Lawyers (Lambda Legal) CDC staff from DHAP and DSTDP
13
How were the Recommendations Developed? Workgroups with members representing health departments, CPGs, academia and special populations Members served as subject matter experts Workgroups wrote sections of new Recommendations Recommendations collated into one document by DSTDP and DHAP cross divisional team
14
Emphasis of Partner Services Recommendations
15
Increased emphasis on Health Department involvement in partner services provision Increased emphasis on active identification of PS candidates (i.e., index patients and partners) All candidates should be offered assistance: level and nature may vary Increased emphasis on linkage to care Increased emphasis on quality assurance and evaluation standards
16
Emphasis of Partner Services Recommendations Increased emphasis on collaboration with internal and external partners involved with PS Increased emphasis on integration of PS into the spectrum of care Nature of integration varies by infection Stronger emphasis on innovative approaches to partner notification and subsequent case-finding Shared Terminology
17
Dissemination, Implementation and Next Steps
18
Dissemination Activities MMWR Publication Internet Posting Distribution of MMWR Distribution of Other Documents
19
Dissemination Communication Dear Colleague Letter Expectations for programs Resources for grantees FAQ for CDC Staff FAQ for External Partners
20
Implementation Input Partner Services Steering Committee Partner Services Lead Team Focus Groups for CDC Staff Focus Groups for Sr. Public Health Advisors Draft Recommendations Reviewer Comments
21
Implementation Input Topics Barriers for Organizations Barriers for Individuals Training & Technical Assistance Needs Potential Challenges Recommendations to CDC
22
Implementation Goal: Motivate and support substantial change in STD and HIV Programs with regard to partner services
23
Implementation Some examples: Increased number of candidates offered PS Increased collaboration between PS Programs and Surveillance Programs resulting in data sharing between programs—Program Integration Increased programmatic activities that reflect the HIV/STD Partner Services Recommendations
24
Implementation CDC’s Implementation Plan Implementation Team—15 members from DSTDP and DHAP 9-step framework based on Rogers Diffusion of Innovation work Focused on CDC activities to support uptake of HIV/STD PS Recommendations
25
Implementation Plan Strategic Vision and Planning Mission Implementation plan Marketing and Promotion Presentations at conferences Webinars Policy Issues Supports from CDC Local supports
26
Implementation Plan Complementary Resources Operational guide Tool kits Training Integrated curriculum design Training plan Technical Assistance Individual Agency or program-wide
27
Implementation Plan Program Development and Infrastructure Funding New program ideas Quality Assurance (of the plan) Quality standards Quality improvement Evaluation (of the plan) Standards Measurement
28
Moving Forward 1 st Draft by March 31 Meeting with DSTDP and DHAP Leadership Input from stakeholders Meetings Webinars Division of work between appropriate work units
29
Thank You!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.